User talk:Malacify247

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Malacify247, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Requiem II (talk) 09:11, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camila Cabello[edit]

Hello! I was reading Camila Cabello’s biography page after noting a mistake in her description for her new album “Camila". She is described in both her biography and the album information as Cuban-American when in fact she is Cuban-Mexican, being born in Cojimar, Cuba, and her father’s ancestry being Mexican. Because the page is protected I can not access the page to edit the error like I did the album page. It’d be very helpful if you fixed the mistake. Thanks so much! GalaxyKittyBoi (talk) 09:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I need a reliable source to be sure that she is actually Cuban-Mexican, If you find one i will for sure add it in. Malacify247 (talk) 09:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Malacify247, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Jacob Sartorius have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Camila (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SummerPhDv2.0: I didn't know that 10.238.52.150 was a sockpuppet account, If i visited the user page i wouldn't of reverted the edit that was made by him/her. Malacify247 (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malacify247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why i've been blocked, What have i done! I wasn't intending on reverting 10.238.52.150 edit because i didn't know that he/she were a sockpuppet? I request to be unblocked because i am definitely not a sockpuppet of Littlemixfan!. Malacify247 (talk) 03:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: How can you prove that i am a sockpuppet? You can't just judge me just because i accidentley reverted an edit by 10.238.52.150 that i didn't even know! Malacify247 (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As above - checkusers have access to advanced technical information that has proven the link to you and your other account. SQL ^{Query me!} 23:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: So you are basically hacking my account and IP address. Malacify247 (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You leave a digital fingerprint everywhere you go. I linked you to the exact tool and information used to identify your other account. Nowhere on that page does it mention - or describe hacking. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]