User talk:Migitgem2009

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Brett_Kearney.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brett_Kearney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shane Towell

A tag has been placed on Shane Towell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chzz ► 13:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; it's just procedure to let you know that a page you made will be deleted. Cheers, Chzz ► 13:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

cheers ive been doing Bradford wikipedia page since 4 years now, im glad someone else is invloved, yeah im from Bradford - MadBullsFan

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm 31,how old are you? I copy contents boxes from other pages, and write in the details in need, cheating i guess, im not a season ticket holder, dont wanna go to Odsal

MadBullsFan (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I think I'll only go when they redevelop Odsal :) MadBullsFan (talk) 09:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hey, hows it going? its good that other people are updating the page, I couldnt be bothered updating it, after that loss.

MadBullsFan (talk) 16:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

that be cool, let us know when you want a break.

MadBullsFan (talk) 16:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

well done for updating the bulls 2011 page your doing a good job

MadBullsFan (talk) 08:28, 08 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vlad Man

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vlad Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Migitgem2009. You have new messages at Talk:Vlad Man.
Message added 11:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of England Cricket Batting Stats for deletion

The article England Cricket Batting Stats is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England Cricket Batting Stats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 10:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Dominic Dempsey

Please do not create attack pages as you did at Dominic Dempsey. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Borkificator (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, my friend accessed my computer when I was logged on and he must have done this. Again sorry Migitgem2009 (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why remove what I've worked so hard to do, just so that the Saint page can look as robotic and the same as every other page of it's ilk?

Ymron (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry pal I didn't realise you did it all. Migitgem2009 (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixtures

You'll have to stop adding (selectively, which is the especially annoying thing) Football League fixtures to articles. They are copyright of, well, the Football League. Thanks in advance. - Dudesleeper talk 23:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by selectivley? And oh sorry didn't realise it was copyrighting, would I be able to do any fixtures for any Prem - League 2 team? Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stats updates

Hi, thanks for updating footballers' stats. However, when you're updating the career statistics tables, could you remember to update the dates too? For example, at James Meredith (footballer), you only updated the stats, meaning the given date of "25 August 2012" is incorrect. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford City season 2010-11

Thanks for all the effort you've put in on this article. When you are linking players though can you check the link you are making. There are a number of players with the same name so putting Hanson for example just links to the disambiguation page listing all people called James Hanson. Instead you need to find the correct article, in this case James Hanson (footballer born 1987) The only other, minor, thing is that Wikipedia style doesn't use date ordinals in dates so today is written 31 August 2012 not 31st August 2012. Thanks. NtheP (talk) 13:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox International Origin series

Hi Migitgem2009. I notice that you recently created, but then blanked Template:Infobox International Origin series. Would you like it to be deleted? DH85868993 (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit the template so that it contains "{{db-author}}" (without the quotes). That will notify an administrator that you, as author of the template, are requesting that it be deleted. (Standard users like you and I aren't able to delete templates; only administrators can do that). Let me know if you need any assistance. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 14:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2013 Salford City Reds season

A tag has been placed on 2013 Salford City Reds season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not give any infomation

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 18:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013 London Broncos season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 London Broncos season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 London Broncos season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal is to move this article to your user space, like the one mentioned below, until such time as it has some content. Please do not create articles comprising empty tables in the main (encyclopedia) space; keep them in your sandbox or another user page until they are ready. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Salford City Reds season

I have userfied the article to User:Migitgem2009/2013 Salford City Reds season. It definitely ins't ready for the mainspace yet. What information is in there can go into the team's article right now and then when they actually start playing the 2013 season the article can be populated and moved back into the mainspace. GB fan 23:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curtis Naughton

The article Curtis Naughton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played at a professional level.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Ward, or Donald Ward?

Hi Migitgem2009, quite a bit before your (and even my) time, but would you know whether Bradford Northern's Edward Ward should actually be named Donald Ward. I've put a description of the conundrum on Talk:Edward Ward (rugby league). Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket

Please don't update the scores every 5 minutes. We aint doing live coverage here... Qantasplanes (talk) 12:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fair enough :) Just trying to be helpful :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding, we can do it after every session (eg. Lunch, Tea, Stumps) or an innings break. Enjoy your editing! Qantasplanes (talk) 22:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) And I will make sure that I only update at those breaks :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And nice work updating the India/England series article! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) If I am at home I will try to do the ODI series and any future England series pages too, I enjoy doing them :D Migitgem2009 (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Always good to find an editor who enjoys a topic AND likes to edit them too! I try and chip in with any international cricket tours that I can get round to editing. Have a great Christmas! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yup :) Well I will continue to edit as long as I have my laptop haha and Merry Christmas to you too :D Migitgem2009 (talk) 11:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket

	Cricket Award
	For your excellent work on Sri Lankan cricket team in Australia in 2012–13 and English cricket team in India in 2012–13. Keep it up! PS Sorry for the poorly done award! Qantasplanes (talk) 03:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) It's not a poorly done one mate it's great ;) Again thank you and I will continue to update cricket tour articles :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 03:54, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And also remember that you can put it on your user page. Qantasplanes (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, how do I do that :/ Migitgem2009 (talk) 04:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can copy and paste it or ~~type the award in~~. Qantasplanes (talk) 08:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 09:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niall Evalds

Hello, Migitgem2009. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Niall Evalds, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Niall Evalds to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Theo Fages

Hello, Migitgem2009. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Theo Fages, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Theo Fages to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marc Sneyd

Hello, Migitgem2009. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Marc Sneyd, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Marc Sneyd to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

Why do you keep taking away the italics? The innings is not over, so someone may yet overtake Joe Root as England's top scorer in the innings, hence the italics. – Pee Jay 17:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took the italics away because he is out, the innings score is in italics as that is still ongoing, the bowler is in italics as they are still on the field bowling, Root is not in italics because his innings has finished. Hope this clears it up pal. Migitgem2009 (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that doesn't explain it at all. The batsman's score should remain in italics as it can still be overtaken. Italics indicate that the stat is not yet confirmed. Just because a batsman is out does not mean that his total cannot be bettered by a team-mate. Hope that clears things up for you, "pal". – Pee Jay 22:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you seriously have an attitude problem, I can't even explain my changes without getting a sarcastic response. A simple "Oh well we don't use italics on batsmen on the cricket scorecards" would have been more than sufficient enough. My understanding was that the team score and the bowler are still being added too, hence the italics whereas Root wasn't in italics. However ignoring your attitude and lack of manners I will take this into consideration next time I make a change to a cricket match article. Migitgem2009 (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but when you come along to the cricket tour articles and make changes without edit summaries (which are recommended, btw), it gives off an air of superiority and arrogance (which I assume was not your intention). I realise that I was mistaken to respond in kind. But yes, those are the reasons why all three stats should remain italicised. Thanks for your understanding, and apologies again. – Pee Jay 23:38, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) I do apologise for not having an edit summary, I will ensure that I put one in from now on. I have done cricket tour edits for a year now and haven't put edit summaries in before :/ but I do understand how it could be frustrating to somebody such as yourself. Again I apologise too. Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford City

Hi there - well done to Bradford City on winning the play-offs. But does coming 7th and winning the play-offs constitute an "honour" for club and player articles? Incidentally, I see that you have edited some player articles (e.g. Jon McLaughlin, Nahki Wells) to suggest that Bradford won the title! -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry haha, after looking back I noticed my mistake. I have put the honour as winning the league rather than the play-off final. Winning the play-offs is an honour as theyy are being promoted however I put it down as they had won the league :/ Again my apologise. Migitgem2009 (talk) 08:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed those two pages to show that we won the Playoffs, not the League itself. Giant Snowman 08:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you very much :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 Bradford City A.F.C. season

To answer your questions one by one: 1) I removed the flags from the infobox simply because, according to MOS:ICON, they're not supposed to be there. 2) I removed the bolding from the scores because there is no need for them to be in bold and the Manual of Style indicates that bolding is only to be used in specific circumstances. 3) I changed the names of the rounds to their correct names. The FA Cup and League Cup do not have quarter-finals, they have a Sixth Round and Fifth Round respectively, and in the FL Trophy, quarter-final and semi-final should be hyphenated. – Pee Jay 22:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Points 2 and 3 are fair enough but as for the flag icon - it appears on the previous season pages and it hasn't been removed and according to the Manual of Style appropriate use is "Repeated use of an icon in a table or infobox. This should only be done if the icon has been used previously with an explanation of its purpose". In this case it is to distinguish the nationality of the top scorer. But I do appreciate you cleaning up the page. To be honest I had no idea there was a Fifth Round in the League Cup, I thought it was the Quarter Final :/ Migitgem2009 (talk) 22:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, not many people are aware that the League Cup uses "Fifth Round" instead of "Quarter-final", but to be honest, they are pretty interchangeable; I just prefer to use the official title. As for the flags, I see you are a Manchester United fan, so I assume you have seen the 2012–13 Manchester United F.C. season article; as you will notice, the flags are not included there either. The reason, I imagine, is that there is no logical reason to emphasise the nationality of any particular individual. I mean, does the fact that Nahki Wells comes from Bermuda have anything to do with him scoring the most goals this season? – Pee Jay 22:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I was one of those that had no idea :) Yeah I have seen it but to be honest I haven't really noticed the flags (or lack of) before. I just had to check the page to make sure. I suppose the reason why I put the flags up is because previous seasons have them and also it identifies the top scorer a bit more. Personally I'd prefer to have them in. Migitgem2009 (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair enough, but to avoid accusations of ownership of articles, I suggest asking at WT:FOOTY for a ruling on the matter. – Pee Jay 23:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your advice and help :) I shall look into that. I also look forward to our inevitable editing of the England vs New Zeland match tomorrow :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Root

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Joe Root. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 17:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts are controversial? And it's all referenced from ESPN Cricinfo which is a reliable source? Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics

Come on, man, if those statistics were that important, you could mention them in a short match report under the summary of each Test. As it is, they're just a few bits of trivia sitting there almost totally out of context. If Shane Watson's 3000th run or Graeme Swann's 250th wicket was a world record or even a national record, it might be worth mentioning, but these things belong on the biography articles of the individuals in question, not in an article about the Ashes series. And before you say, I feel this way about similar sections in other articles, so don't feel I'm targeting this one for any other reason than it's the one that's in progress right now. – Pee Jay 22:38, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay :) I only put them in because I thought the milestones would interest the reader. Just to be clear only important records can go on right? So if for example Alastair Cook passed 8,900 runs that would be okay to put in as it would be a national record? It's just a little confusing to me that's all like what should go on the article and what shouldn't. I do apologise for putting the stats in again. I just thought somebody took them out accidentally when adding in the series scorers at the bottom. Although that isn't really necessary as the are recorded in the infobox anyway, it just adds some nice reading for the reader :) Thanks though for letting me know before I added more tonight :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:39, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think when you have to make a decision about what should go in the article, you should bear in mind that Wikipedia is supposed to be predominantly prose. Match reports are eminently preferable to lists of stats, and there is even a page here that says Wikipedia is not a stats almanac. I know what you added doesn't exactly constitute a "long and sprawling list", but all info should be put into the context of the entire event. I recognise that this is a problem we have with a lot of other sports articles on Wikipedia, but I hope that we can rectify the problem in the present and then go back and fix the past when we have an opportunity. As for the Alastair Cook record, I think that would be fine to put in, but only as a sentence or two in a prose account of the match when he breaks the record, not in a standalone section at the bottom of the page with boilerplate text reading "Alastair Cook became England's highest Test run scorer when he scored XXX runs in the Xth Test at Foo". It has to be more than that, or else what are we giving the reader that they can't read elsewhere? – Pee Jay 14:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay pal I will bear that in mind in the future :) So on future articles you would advise against doing the stats section? Thanks again for your help. Even after 4 years I am still learning the tricks of the trade of wiki editing. Migitgem2009 (talk) 18:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to revert you as it wouldn't be constructive to do so, but for future reference, we really shouldn't update cricket articles at a drinks break. Lunch, tea, stumps and innings breaks are the only times to update, at least in my experience. Otherwise where do you draw the line? Every over? Every ball? People would be updating like nobody's business. – Pee Jay 03:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay pal thanks for the heads up :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 04:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to West Indian cricket team in New Zealand in 2013–14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| wickets-team1-inns1 = ''[[Sunil Narine]] 2/43]] (22 overs)''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Brook

The article Adam Brook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not yet played a game in a fully professional league per WP:RLN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 23:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Brook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Brook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Brook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 17:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jamie Foster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Huddersfield Giants]]) then in Round 24 ([[Hull FC]]). His final game for Bradford was in Round 27 ([[London Broncos]]. Jamie featured in Round 4 ([[Oldham Roughyeds]]) to Round 5 ([[Catalan Dragons]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at 2014–15 Bradford City A.F.C. season, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per WP:MOSFLAG. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have been doing the Bradford City season pages for a number of years now and I have not had one complaint, you come on here and start changing things. Just leave it and stick to the pages you edited before? Thanks for your consideration Migitgem2009 (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you refer to WP:OWN. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had a feeling you would refer to that. I do not believe I own the page but I do believe that I have followed the structure of previous Bradford City season pages (have a look). Also other pages such as Aston Villa's season page (lots more too just too long of a list to type) only have the surname of their top scorer. Others do have the full name (Man Utd) but I chose to do the surname because previous Bradford City pages do it so I am keeping it consistent. I do appreciate that someone else has an interest in this page though. Migitgem2009 (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wakefield roster

It appears that you put the Catalans Dragons current roster on the 2015 Wakefield Trinity Wildcats season article. -Niceguyedc ^{Go Huskies!} 11:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied and pasted the template from the Catalan page but didn't have time to change it, funnily enough I was just about to alter it once I had the correct webpages up when your message appeared! Good timing haha! But thanks anyway. Always nice to see someone paying attention to these pages! Migitgem2009 (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Widdop

Hi there, which part(s) of my edits did you disagree with? A total revert seems a bit of a blunt instrument for an edit which contained lots of smaller changes, lots of which are pretty uncontroversial. Mattlore (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, genuinely did not mean to revert everything you did. Only ones I disagreed with was taking stats out of the info box (he's played 26 games for St George rather than the 25 that was there under your edit), merging the clubs under his career (I believe it should be seperated to define what he has achieved with both clubs/or lack of in his case haha) and the taking out of the St George stats. Quite a few players have this on there page (I understand some don't, not every page is the same!). It is really good to see people taking an interest in editing the rugby league pages though! I didn't think there was many of us! Migitgem2009 (talk) 04:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, all the new editors always seem to come out of the woodwork during the start of a new season. They're always good intentioned but they need to be kept informed of policies!

Personally, I don't particularly like the three tiered heading system of "playing career"->"club"->"year" as I think its a bit of overkill. But I don't have a preference of which "club" or "year" should be there. Not sure what you meant by 26 or 25 games, I didn't change those stats? Mattlore (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest that was what I originally thought about you haha (I mean new editor) until I actually looked at your profile. Yeah I understand what you mean, it drives me insane especially when people like yourself and I have been editing them for a number of years. I do understand where you are coming from about the three tiered system but other pages do have it, some don't, some do. I'm just following what has been done previously. Plus you can't really let personal preferences affect the edit otherwise it delves into the ownership of the page policy (which is a drag) haha. I mean't the stats in the info box (where it states their club, appearances, tries, goals, points etc). I thought that it was part of your edit. Well hopefully we can work together in the future on rugby league as it is genuinely nice to other people take an interest in the sport! Migitgem2009 (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five-wicket hauls by ground

Hello Migitgem2009! Thanks for your contributions..plse help us in completing england section of following template

..Thanks GreenCricket^TALK 15:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karl Davies (rugby league)

The article Karl Davies (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby league player who fails WP:RLN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Ulugia

The article Chris Ulugia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby league player who fails WP:RLN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samir Tahraoui

The article Samir Tahraoui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rugby league player who fails WP:RLN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Ulugia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Ulugia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ulugia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Migitgem2009. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ethan Ryan

The article Ethan Ryan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:RLN as has not played in the Super League. Only a single source offered so does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Joshua vs. Wladimir Klitschko has been accepted

Anthony Joshua vs. Wladimir Klitschko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Piped links…

Hi Migitgem2009, I've responded to your message… here. Best regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brandan Wilkinson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brandan Wilkinson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mattlore (talk) 01:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in European current templates

Hello there, I have been asked by another member of WPRL to widen the conversation on "Flags in European current templates", in the hope to gain a wider consensus. I imagine that this message may well never be read, dismissed, see me lose support, potentially gain some or take the discussion forwards. Please do take the time to read the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_league#Flags_in_squad_templates if you can, but the crux of my position is that the flags are prevalent elsewhere, are consistent with usage by the MOS, and their implementation for their rugby league national squad/team or representative nationality, is in line with their intended purpose. The crux of the remove side would be an IP editor may interpret a flag as indication of birth, give too much credence to the nation, and the decision was made previously. To remove them from all rugby league templates when there is a limited conversation would seem more than a little unfair I would say, hence the attempt to reach out. I'm quite happy to voted down, but would appreciate a few more voices to the discussion, else it would seem quite wrong to move from the majority into the minority.Fleets (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Migitgem2009. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, sorry about that! I must have skimmed past it and just updated the stats. I'll keep it in mind for next time. Thank you for pointing it out to me :) Kind regards, Migitgem2009 (talk) 02:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Template:Bradford City A.F.C. squad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thank you for letting me know. Would the BBC Match Report count as a reliable source as that had Warnock down as number 15? Migitgem2009 (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Table dates

Hi, please remember to update the dates above career stats tables when updating the figures. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate. Must have forgotton. Thank you for the correction. Kind regards, Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Migitgem2009. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Johnson (rugby league born 1985)

Hi Migitgem2009, Would you know what happened to Richard Johnson (rugby league born 1985) and his brothers? Best regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't mate. I only know he was part of the 2008 squad. I assume his brothers were released our left the academy around the same time as Richard left the club. Sorry I couldn't be of more help! Migitgem2009 (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international cricket centuries at Sophia Gardens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket centuries at Sophia Gardens, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

v t e International cricket five-wicket hauls by ground
Australia	Adelaide Oval The Gabba MCG SCG WACA
Bangladesh	Sher-e-Bangla
England	Edgbaston Headingley Lord's Old Trafford Riverside The Oval Trent Bridge
India	Arun Jaitley Brabourne Eden Gardens Ekana Chidambaram Wankhede
New Zealand	Basin Reserve Eden Park Lancaster Park McLean Park
Pakistan	Gaddafi National
South Africa	Kingsmead Newlands Old Wanderers St George's Park Wanderers
Sri Lanka	Saravanamuttu Sinhalese Sports Club
West Indies	Bourda Kensington Oval Queens Park Oval Sabina Park
Zimbabwe	Harare Sports Club Queens Sports Club