User talk:Muzzleflash

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to China Tobacco has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: China Tobacco was changed by Muzzleflash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868022 on 2014-12-24T06:20:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muzzleflash, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Muzzleflash! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

China Tobacco article

You left a comment on my talk page regarding rolling back your edits to China Tobacco. Your comments to me appeared a bit snide. Your edits had been previously flagged by a bot as possible vandalism:

06:20, 24 December 2014‎ ClueBot NG (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (9,490 bytes) (-27)‎ . . (Reverting possible vandalism by Muzzleflash to version by Wikiklrsc. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (2072438) (Bot)) (undo)

Your only edits to the English Wikipedia are to China Tobacco and State Tobacco Monopoly Administration and you just started editing under this id "Muzzleflash" December 24, 2014. Fair enough. In your edits you moved material out to other places, revised content re: China Tobacco.
You've restored your edits after my rollback.
If I've made an error, which I likely have, I apologize. So apologies.
I've been editing Wikipedia without trouble since January 2005.
--- Wikiklrsc (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:China National Gold Group logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:China National Gold Group logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sinocare

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sinocare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sinocare. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

As I said in my edit summary, a medical journal article is not a good source for economic info. Additionally, you appear to be confused about how editing works here. WP:BRD is the applicable policy. If another editor removes something you added, the WP:BURDEN is on you to justify it on the talk page, not on them to justify its removal. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sinocare. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.
If you put it back again, you will be in violation of the WP:3RR rule. You can be blocked for that John from Idegon (talk) 08:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Deletion

There is a trinity at work here, so to explain why your article was axed you need to look at three points.

First, notability. Your article had notability, the company was considered worthy to have a wikipedia article and the subject was permitted under all relevant policy and guideline material for the site. Accordingly, then, on this ground the article earned a point for keep.

The second of the three points is significance. Here the article failed the retention criteria because significance is not the same thing as notability, notability means that the article covers a subject with notability that is measured to our standards laid out on the page WP:NOTABILITY. Significance, on the other hand, is not a subsection of notability, its an independent barometer to measure why an article should stay. What has it done? What does it show? In your article's case, the material failed the significance criteria. So an independent company in China makes pharmaceuticals. Why should we care? Did they have a Nobel prize for work in the field? Are they sole supplier to the army in times of war? Is the product patented? The absence of any information of this nature left the article loaded with simple statements and no real encyclopedic material. Which brings us to the last point:

Advertisement. Without the material to show significance the article had only a few lines that resulted in its being read not like an encyclopedia article but an ad in the paper, and ads are not permitted on Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a web host or an advertisement service. Having broke even over the first two points, this point sunk the article by bringing the tally against it 2-1 in favor of deletion.

Now, if you disagree with the reasons provided and would like the article restored, I can do that; however if it is restored it will be nominated for deletion, which will result in a minimum 7-day period of discussion about the article and its value to the site. If you would rather not have the article up at afd, I could restore it to user subpage so as to allow you to work on the article until such a time as it reaches a point that it can go into the article space without risk of deletion. I could also put the article over at the articles for creation section of Wikipedia, where a team of people can monitor the article's progress and offer feedback to help out with the article's development. Lastly, if you want to challenge the deletion directly, you can go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and file an appeal to the community to see if they agree with you. If they do, they will restore the article to the article space exactly as it was before it was deleted. Lastly, you have the unattractive but ever present option to do nothing with these venues and simply leave the situation as is. I await your response on the course of action you wish to take, should you decide to petition for your article back. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the article and moved it to the draft space, you can find it at Draft:Sinocare. Good luck on the reworking of the article, and I look forward to having it out and retained here soon. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinocare (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sinocare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sinocare

Hello, Muzzleflash. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sinocare".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitchell Dong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Dong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Dong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tempo Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fangshan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Textile industry in China

On 18 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Textile industry in China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that China is the world's largest textile exporter with an export value in 2013 nearly seven times greater than the next largest exporting country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Textile industry in China. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Textile industry in China), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hami Railway Station

added a link pointing to Hami

Muqam

added a link pointing to Hami

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Muzzleflash. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Polyphenylene sulfide page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Wangsu Science & Technology

Hi, I'm Triptothecottage. Muzzleflash, thanks for creating Wangsu Science & Technology!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey, I just think there's a couple of phrases like "the path of global expansion" which probably don't belong in an encyclopaedia article. Otherwise, well done!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Triptothecottage (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Yiwu International Trade City

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.yiwu-market-guide.com/yiwu-market-map.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qixing Group

The article Qixing Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORDEPTH. Notable for a one time event which was solved (relatively) easily. Serves more as an example of general levels of debt of corporations and lending practices in China. Lacking individual notability as company, though

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kaluga Queen

On 30 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kaluga Queen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kaluga Queen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kaluga Queen), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 05:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yanqi Hui Autonomous County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Muzzleflash. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Konomi Suzuki.
Message added 09:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Leaving this message as there seems to be a problem with pings at the moment. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Altan Xire

Hello! Your submission of Altan Xire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Xiangshawan

On 17 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xiangshawan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the desert area Xiangshawan (literally, "resonant sand gorge") in Inner Mongolia derives from the loud boom and whistling sound created when sliding down its sand dune? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xiangshawan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Xiangshawan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Altan Xire

On 26 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Altan Xire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Altan Xire, the main township of a rural county in Inner Mongolia, has an extensive urban skyline? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Altan Xire. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Altan Xire), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one! You might be interested in putting your articles up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure

Hello! Your submission of 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure

On 2 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a political scandal erupted in 2014 after operatives of the Liberian National Security Agency illegally seized US$247,500 from a group of South Korean businessmen in a hotel room in Monrovia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

from kowiki

Unfortunately, the only thing that I can found on the Internet was this blog article. Sorry about that.--Namoroka (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Muzzleflash. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo upload

May I ask where you got the photo you added here? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC) User:Anna Frodesiak[reply]

I took it and release it into the public domain. Muzzleflash (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's great news. Thanks! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Business process outsourcing in China

On 14 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Business process outsourcing in China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the outsourcing industry in China is rapidly growing on the back of "cloud computing, big data, Internet of things and mobile Internet"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Business process outsourcing in China. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Business process outsourcing in China), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AAAAA Tourist Attractions of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinshan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Business process outsourcing in China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

Kehinde Wiley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Coffee production in China

On 21 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coffee production in China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 98 percent of coffee grown in China comes from one province? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coffee production in China. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Coffee production in China), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I really enjoyed reading your article. Thanks for your contribution. Abductive (reasoning) 18:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you

The Did You Know? Barnstar of Excellence

Congratulations to you for getting your article mentioned in the DYK section of Wikipedia’s Main Page. I realize that you get a notification that your article has been selected, but the effort you put into the process is substantial. As you already know, the DYK section showcases new or expanded articles that are selected and are approved through a review process. By creating your featured content you have helped to highlight the variety of information on Wikipedia, thereby providing insight into the range of material that Wikipedia covers. I’ve gone through the process myself a number of times and sometimes it’s not as easy as it looks. You’ve put in the time and effort to improve content and you deserve recognition and appreciation.

The Very Best of Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 21:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive feedback User:Abductive, User:Barbara (WVS). Muzzleflash (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Longqing Gorge

On 14 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Longqing Gorge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Longqing Gorge is a scenic area in Beijing created after the flooding of the canyon by the construction of a nearby dam? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Longqing Gorge. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Longqing Gorge), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AAAAA Tourist Attractions of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhangjiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wang Family Compound

On 7 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wang Family Compound, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the rising prosperity of the Wang family of Lingshi County during the Qing dynasty financed the multi-generation construction of a grand residential complex of hundreds of courtyards with over 2,000 rooms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wang Family Compound. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wang Family Compound), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Wins Finance Holdings) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wins Finance Holdings, Muzzleflash!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Telling Telecom

The article Telling Telecom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]