Jump to content

User talk:Naranirma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Naranirma! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anya Chalotra. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 01:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Colonization, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 01:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Look! I do not know whether you are right or wrong. But you need to start using the article talk page to explain what you want done, and why sources support it. The article talk page is Talk:Kalash people for the article on the Kalash people. There is no point in you repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]