User talk:Neateditor123
January 2018
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to God's Not Dead (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 01:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 01:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome Neateditor123!
I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Death of a Nation: Can We Save America a Second Time?, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You need to obtain consensus on the talk page before removing content. If you continue to engage in this behavior, you may be reported for violations of the three-revert rule and edit warring. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
[edit]Per WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD, once an edit is contested, please avoid restoring your changes without a clear consensus at the article's talk page. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 00:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Important message about articles pertaining to pseudoscience
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
—PaleoNeonate – 00:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Please note that the above message is for every editor participating in the topic area and can be renewed every 12 months. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 00:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Unbroken: Path to Redemption. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sakaimover (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit]Hello again, Neateditor123. Please make sure to only mark as minor edits that do not change at all the article's contents (WP:MINOR has more information). this for instance removes material and is not a minor edit. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 07:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Unbroken: Path to Redemption
[edit]Although your complaint seems legitimate, it has to be removed from Talk:Unbroken: Path to Redemption because article talk pages are reserved for discussing ways to improve the article. When you have a message to a specific user, it is best practice to either go directly to their talk page or notify them using a template like {{u}} or {{ping}}, as I'm about to do right now: @Sakaimover: Your revert was indeed strange. Would you mind explaining it to Neateditor123? Nardog (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- OK, the next time something like that happens, I will go to the user's talk page instead of the article under which I got that statement. I'm sorry for not noticing that I could do that beforehand.
--Neateditor123 (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
- It was unsourced and it looked like number change vandalism. Sakaimover (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- OK, that's bullshit and you know it. First of all, it was sourced perfectly well (I don't even know how anyone could POSSIBLY not see that), and second of all, it was NOT number change vandalism. All I was doing is updating the Rotten Tomatoes score, which changes all the time. Other than to be a total jerk, I don't see how you could POSSIBLY make that argument, MUCH less use it as a reason to threaten to possibly BAN somebody from Wikipedia. If the RT score is wrong, instead of lashing out at the last person who edited it, maybe you could stand to just update it yourself for once. --Neateditor123 (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
Distorted film poster
[edit]I noticed that you added the film poster after uploading it to Commons. Good work, but Commons can't be used to host non-free files. You'll need to use the WP:File Upload Wizard to upload the file here. Check the "fair use" option and follow the instructions, and everything should be fine. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- OK then, I'll use that next time. Thanks for the helpful information!--Neateditor123 (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
September 2018
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry I did that. It's just that the section about that topic that I created under the Talk Page got way off-topic, and no one was responding to my questions about this particular topic, so I mistakenly assumed that the issue was resolved.--Neateditor123 (talk) 18:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Technical limitations on replies
[edit]Hi. Wikipedia talk pages are a bit unusual, and I just wanted to offer you some helpful info. Ten days ago you posted a reply to me but due to technical limitations the system didn't notify me about it. Take a look at this diff of your edit. To trigger a comment-notification to someone, an edit needs to satisfy the following criteria:
The edit must contain a link to their user: page, their user_talk: page, or {{replyto}} which will provide that link.
The edit must be ~~~~ signed. (It doesn't work if you add the signature in a second edit.)- (?) I'm not sure if this was changed, but there is (or was) a restriction that the edit must diff as pure added text. The diff of your edit shows minus content on the left, which might or might-not work.
- I believe the edit must be limited to affecting only one =section= of the page.
- To avoid abuse/spam/unintentional-mass-messages, a single edit can attempt notify at most 50 people. If an edit would notify 51 people then none of them are notified.
If you forget to include the username, or typo the username, or forget to sign or whatever, don't try to repair it. Either revert the mistake and try again, or follow it with a new signed edit to mention the person to trigger a notification. Alsee (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips, Neateditor123!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new article on the album "Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips". However, there is a reason other editors redirected the album to the band's article. For an article about the album to survive, you will have to provide evidence that is notable as an entity in its own right. See WP:NALBUMS.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
The Passion of the Christ
[edit]I gave a reason in my edit summary. Your source might not be considered reliable, so take it the talk page and let's see what others' think. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Neateditor123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kombucha. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit] Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
@SNUGGUMS: Which of my edits are you referring to here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neateditor123 (talk • contribs)
- This one where you added an unsupported summarization of reviews. Nowhere else in the article text is there any cited assessment of how it was received. What we would need is to include a reference discussing whether its critical reception was overall favorable/mixed/unfavorable. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS: To be honest, I would understand your argument better if you actually removed the "original research" statement ("Some critics praised the track's production while others felt that its lyrics contained "clichés".") rather than just move it to the top of the page. By your logic, that should be deleted, so that's what I shall do.--Neateditor123 (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Neateditor123
- I was referring more to how favorable you ranked its reception. Talking about what they liked/didn't like is a separate matter when comments are included within the "critical reception" section to back up such detail for the lead. In general, that section could probably be expanded. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Red links
[edit]Please read WP:REDLINK. Red links are not "dead links", which refers to reference URLs that no longer work. They are indications that the topic may warrant an article. Sometimes they are left after an article is deleted, but more commonly they are left as an indication to future editors. Brandon Tyler Russell has had a long career as a child actor and is listed in numerous articles on films; he bears consideration for a future article. (He in fact had one but it was deleted as copyvio, which says nothing about notability.) Please don't delete red links unless they appear to be mistaken; if they can be turned blue by fixing a misspelling or creating a redirect, that's also better than removing the red link. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for pages related to Abortion
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:14, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
We do not delete discussions on archives
[edit]See WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Unplanned, you may be blocked from editing. Please bear WP:NPOV in mind and the fact that the topic-area is under discretionary sanctions that you have been previously informed about by User:Doug Weller. Before re-introducing language such as in these edits discuss the issue on the article talkpage and gain consensus. Abecedare (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Re: Unplanned
[edit]IP editor 184.89.186.111 keeps changing "anti-abortion" to "pro-life" in the article. FYI I have started a discussion on the Talk page. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Doctorx0079: Cool. See ya there.Neateditor123 (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Neateditor123
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus Strikes Back: Judgment Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New World Order (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JSB violence.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:JSB violence.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JSB violence.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JSB violence.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your work, especially for copyediting, removal of trivial text and general improvements on Unplanned. Keep it up! Robincantin (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC) |
Important Notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 16:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Minor edits redux
[edit]i don't know if you have this set as a default or if you do this by hand, but I see that you've been told about your misuse of the tag twice. I think you need to avoid its use entirely. As they say in baseball, three strikes and you're out. But as all you have to do to avoid being blocked is to make sure that your edits aren't marked minor, you should have no problems. Doug Weller talk 20:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kidz Bop 4 Album Cover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Kidz Bop 4 Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Armond White.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Armond White.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Cupper52 (talk) 09:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Jesus Strikes Back.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Strikes Back.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Parental Advisory
[edit]Parental Advisory has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Neateditor123, please remove "due to personal biases" from your comment unless there is evidence for this, in which case that should be included. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- I removed the "personal biases" line, but to be sure, would these comments be good-enough evidence?
- The citation of this review is deceptive right-wing conspiracy theorists have nothing to do with child sex trafficking is it the position that liberals do not care about child sex trafficking (From that article's edit history)
- "Let's assume that, like me, you’re not a right-wing fundamentalist conspiracy theorist looking for a dark, faith-based suspense film"
- What is the point of this sentence? What does this have to do with the review of the film ? This is unnecessary political bias and slander that is not informative or apropos. (From that article's Talk Page)
- This seems to count as "personal biases" to me, but if it's insufficient proof, that's totally fine.--Neateditor123 (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hm, tough. Thanks for removing it; I'd say it wouldn't be a helpful addition even if true. I see your point, especially in the over-generalizing reference to "liberals" in the quote above. But in the end, it's a discussion about content, and concerns about user conduct are best voiced on user talk pages (or WP:ANI). Let's keep the article talk page discussion about the article content to improve the chances of finding a consensus. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree that's a reasonable way to reach some kind of consensus here. Thanks for the response! --Neateditor123 (talk) 18:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hm, tough. Thanks for removing it; I'd say it wouldn't be a helpful addition even if true. I see your point, especially in the over-generalizing reference to "liberals" in the quote above. But in the end, it's a discussion about content, and concerns about user conduct are best voiced on user talk pages (or WP:ANI). Let's keep the article talk page discussion about the article content to improve the chances of finding a consensus. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Roger Waters Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking Censored Cover.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roger Waters Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking Censored Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
When updating film reviews summaries ...
[edit]Hello @Neateditor123. I am @Archer1234. I noticed in this edit that you updated the Rotten Tomatoes reviews summary for Cabrini (film). Thank you for doing that.
However, you should always update the |access-date= parameter of the corresponding citation used to verify the new information. I have made that update for you, but please remember to do so when you make updates in the future. If you have any questions for me, ask them here or on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)