User talk:Netha Hussain (WikiCred)

Welcome!

Hi Netha Hussain (WikiCred)! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 10:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clean up your edits to add chapter information, at the least

Hello, thanks for your edits, but Wikipedia much prefers speicific inline references to chapters/page numbers, where possible. Please see my edit summary here. Graham87 10:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Graham87! Thank you for the feedback. I am now adding chapter URLs instead of the book URL to my previous edits. I am also trying to add et. al to the author list like you did in your edit summary for the Joints page here, but when I try to do the same, I am getting a citebook error that says Explicit use of et al. in: |last1= . I can't seem to add et al. in the same way as you have done in your edit. Please see how reference [1] shows up in the list of references here. Do you know how to solve this? Netha Hussain (WikiCred) (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just got this. I didn't know this either but you can use display-authors=etal, like BattyBot did in its edit. Graham87 14:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:Graham87! Netha Hussain (WikiCred) (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Netha Hussain (WikiCred). Thank you for your work on Biaxial joint. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This might be more useful to create a biaxial joint stub article that can reference the different types. See Multiaxial joint as example.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: Thank you for the suggestion! I created the article, but it is now tagged as having doubtful notability. --Netha Hussain (WikiCred) (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It needs more sources to show notability. At least two that satisfy WP:GNG AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biaxial joint moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Biaxial joint, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sphilbrick:: The content is copied from Open Stax: Anatomy and Physiology textbook, that is available under CC-BY 4.0 license (ref), and hence compatible for use on Wikipedia. I had also added the reference link to the textbook and {{CC-notice}} within the reference statement, to indicate that parts of the text has been copied as is to the article. I hope the text can stay on Wikipedia. --Netha Hussain (WikiCred) (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you, I reverted S Philbrick (Talk) 15:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]