User talk:Nibi

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Michael Bay, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. faithless (^speak) 20:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carbomb_group1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carbomb_group1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Golden ratio, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C25XE

Please stop removing the uncategorised tag without putting the page in suitable categories. BlueValour (talk) 22:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ShaunVectra004.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ShaunVectra004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ctor-cavalierturbo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ctor-cavalierturbo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Vauxhall Astra GTE render.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Nibi!
We thank you for uploading Image:Vauxhall Astra GTE render.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DCP 0009.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Nibi!
We thank you for uploading ~~Image:DCP 0009.jpg~~ (File:Vauxhall DOHC 16V.jpg), but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Juice logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Juice logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:C20xesparkplugcovers.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:C20xesparkplugcovers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Paxse (talk) 15:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Werewolvesoflondon-title.png

Thanks for uploading File:Werewolvesoflondon-title.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Werewolvesoflondon-title.png

Thanks for uploading File:Werewolvesoflondon-title.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Benweinman.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Benweinman.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 17:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hfromstepsisdead.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hfromstepsisdead.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Istcol (talk) 03:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

The edits that you have made to Suicide Silence and No Time to Bleed have been identified as vandalism, general advertising is never tolerated. Further warning can lead you to being blocked from editing. -- GunMetal Angel 16:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note from me: Actually, adding a link to another site is NOT vandalism. Read the rules. Please blocked me if you have the power. And fuck you "fanboy".

Due to your personal attacks, it has to this warning. If you do that again, you will be blocked. - GunMetal Angel 19:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked? whatever shall I do ... - Nibi 19:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nibi, please stop attacking GMA. The edits in which you have done aren't considered constructive. Please read some of the rules for more info about what is typically allowed on articles. If you have any questions for me, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks TheWeakWilled (T * G) 00:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Markhennessy.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Markhennessy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Starionseinfeld.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Starionseinfeld.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:K16cylinderhead.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:K16cylinderhead.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I TOOK THE PHOTO, I CREATED THE IMAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?!? --Nibi (talk) 11:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ddayboxcover1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ddayboxcover1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Spybotmyway.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spybotmyway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Men of War: Red Tide

The article Men of War: Red Tide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Menofwarredtidescreenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Menofwarredtidescreenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Llandudnopanorama.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Llandudnopanorama.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo. I tried to add copyright information, as I do with all of my photos. However, I won't be reuploading this or anymore. Thanks. --Nibi (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image sourcing, copyrights and possible move to Commons

Hi Nibi,

I'm thinking of expanding a bit on the Rover K engines (through bolt engines, wet liners) and was interested in maybe using some of your images. File:KseriesK18.jpg was one, also File:K16cylinderhead.jpg

I see from the rash of templates that there has been some past issues over annotating these images after upload, to identify sourcing & copyright. Can I help in any way? It looks like you're uploading photos you took yourself, and you then want to release these with either CC or public domain licences. If that's the case, then pasting in a fragment like this should sort you out (I took the liberty of doing this for File:KseriesK18.jpg):

== {{int:filedesc}} ==
{{Information 

  |Description=   Description stuff

  |Source={{own}}
  |Author={{own}}

  |date=  Whenever
}}

== {{int:license}} ==
{{PD-self}}

{{CC-by-sa}} is another good choice of licence, if you don't want full PD.

I know the whole templated complaints thing is a pain, especially when you know that you took the photo yourself. However see it from WP's side - there's an awful lot of content, some of it's hooky, and the only way to manage copyright compliance (which matters, or else WP just gets sued into oblivion by some big studio) is by having a big, powerful steamroller that's not always too easy to steer. So if uploaders use the templates, auto-check people use the right autho-checking, we all get to have a quiet life and our pictures are on-line. Sorted.

Commons

Another way (which is what I generally do) is to send stuff to Wikimedia Commons instead. Bit of a nicer atmosphere for editors too, IMHO. Simple upload system that lets you pick licences (CC-by-sa is usually good) and better categorization trees for organising them.

It's also possible to auto-move images to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons

Anyway, hope this helps (and it's better than more templates). Shout if I can help at all. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really have any idea on copyrighting/tagging images, I think most of my images I've submitted are removed. You can use the images if you want to expand the KSeries section, I can't send them over or resubmit them with your copyright information! Thanks! --Nibi (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Menofwarredtideboxart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Menofwarredtideboxart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cattlepress

The article Cattlepress has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionably notable for general notability and or bands notability guidelines as my searches found nothing better at all aside from a few passing mentions. The only claim of significance to exempt this from A7 is the record label but there's nothing else to suggest notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Car Bomb (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nibi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neck (New York Band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neck (New York Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 20:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neck (New York Band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neck (New York Band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neck (New York Band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nibi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nibi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Celebritynetworth.com as a source

Hi Nibi . I noticed that you recently used celebritynetworth.com as a source for biographical information in Tom Morello. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#CelebrityNetWorth is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Stormbirds (video game)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stormbirds (video game). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#Stormbirds (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. IceWelder [✉] 20:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]