User talk:Okadiputera

Okadiputera, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Okadiputera! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Ambarrukmo (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Ambarrukmo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Royal Ambarrukmo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Ambarrukmo has been accepted

Royal Ambarrukmo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of COMO Hotels and Resorts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article COMO Hotels and Resorts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COMO Hotels and Resorts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi. Please could you read MOS:OVERLINK, particularly, "Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked: ... The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar. This generally includes major examples of: countries (e.g., Japan/Japanese, Brazil/Brazilian) geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America) locations (e.g., New Delhi ... Southeast Asia) ... nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., British, Chinese, Turkish, African-American, Nigerian)". Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meticulo thanks for leaving the message. I completely understand, and will familiarise myself with MOS:OVERLINK. Sorry for the inconvenience. Okadiputera (talk) 11:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alila

Hi Okadiputera, your page move of Alila (film) and creation of Alila (disambiguation) has raised a few questions (in my mind anyway). I posted a question about it at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Alila and Alila (disambiguation). Leschnei (talk) 13:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello Okadiputera. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Okadiputera. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Okadiputera|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi user:Blablubbs, I am not a paid advocate and I am not employed, compensated or reimbursed (financially or otherwise) for the edits I have made. I have made those contributions solely because hotels, hospitality, and architecture are the topics I am most interested in. I have a passion for said topics, and made the contributions to improve coverage of the project particularly in relation to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hotels. Regards, Okadiputera (talk) 19:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COMO Hotels and Resorts moved to draftspace

This article seems to be promotional WP:PROMO and possible WP:COI. Besides that, the article is patrolled by an ID:GermanKity that has been recently "blocked indefinitely" for advertising and promotional edits which is a direct violation of Wikipedia editing policies. -Hatchens (talk) 14:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:COMO Hotels and Resorts logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:COMO Hotels and Resorts logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]