User talk:Ozzieboy
|
2019
[edit]Highest mountains in Scotland or similar name.
[edit]In this entry you have chart showing heights of peaks. You also have a column headed Relative Height. The words "Relative Height" link to a page that does not (so far as I can see) explain what Relative Height means and I with my small brain remain confused - Sorry for even asking! Iain Rae IainRae (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- I must admit I had no idea what you were talking about at first, but I tracked down the edit I did - it's from over a year ago! The original page was "List of mountains and hills of the United Kingdom". That has since been redirected to List of mountains of the British Isles by height.
- I see in the original article, the tables had a column titled "Relative height", but on the new page that has been replaced with "Prom." (for Prominence). When you click on "relative height" in the sentence before the table it takes you to Topographic prominence.
- I understand that relative height and prominence are the same thing. However, after reading through the Topographic prominence article, I don't think I can really explain it to you as I don't fully understand it myself. I only did that one edit on the article (because your question shouldn't have been in the article itself) and so I am not qualified to explain it to you.
- You might want to ask User talk:Britishfinance as he/she has done the most edits on List of mountains of the British Isles by height so I guess he/she has a better understanding of it.
- Sorry I wasn't much help.
- Ozzieboy (talk) 14:52, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of stage names have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. PATH SLOPU 06:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Stage names
[edit]Seems like the cuts might stick this time. Are you planning on continuing? If you do, I would suggest trimming even more from the few examples you leave behind. Maybe 3 at most per qualification. --Khajidha (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)+
- I will continue - I just haven't had the time lately. If you want to do some pruning, by all means go ahead. Ozzieboy (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]2020
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]2021
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]2022
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
2023
[edit]Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Ozzieboy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 15:50, Monday, August 14, 2023 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
2024
[edit]Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,