User talk:Paniago

January 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Oscar Niemeyer. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --ELEKHH^T 02:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Elekhh,

you need to learn as a good student before to be a historian.

I made that photo. - I put Mr. Niemeyer in that place under my left arm. - I Got the exclusive angle competing with more than 20 lens. - After negotiated the position (place) with Mr. Niemeyer's staff (was hard to negotiate). The place is named Dercy Golçalves in the top of National Theater

Teatro Nacional de Brasília (Cláudio Santoro) projected by Oscar Niemeyer
This Building is the oposit side to Cathedral

It was a cerimony of signature of a Inttention to Build the Cultural Complex of the Republic the two last buildings needed to complete the Esplanade.

Resume: This Photo is a living history going.

Your Job here as editor is elastic. - The Niemeyer's best photo don't. - I'm the author and a representant of all lenses working in that special date. - When started the construction (legally) of Niemeyer's last monument in Brazil's Capital.

This photo represents the architects by a 94 years old professional in charge.

Your arguments are insane considering you don't know who is your's picture choice author.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paniago (talk • contribs) 13 January 2015‎

Paniago, you really need to learn more about Wikipedia. I invite you again to start at Wikipedia:Introduction. Also please be civil and avoid that abusive tone you're using above.

Regarding your picture, you indicated that you took it in 2005, and that Niemeyer was 94 years old. But Niemeyer was born 1907, so your story doesn't add up. The image is also very low resolution. Furthermore your claim of importance is just that, your opinion, and you need to argue on the article's talk page to achieve consensus to replace the lead image. Thanks. --ELEKHH^T 22:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is correct I bought my first digital camera in 2002 and this photo is in a negative film.

But, the only thing correct is his age, because I remember they talked about it I listened. He was 94.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Oscar Niemeyer. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Oscar Niemeyer. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 01:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]