User talk:Rhododendrites/2022a
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rhododendrites, for the period January 2022 - March 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Keechant Sewell on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grand Prospect Hall
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand Prospect Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grand Prospect Hall
The article Grand Prospect Hall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grand Prospect Hall for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grand Prospect Hall
The article Grand Prospect Hall you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Grand Prospect Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation about the purpose of the page. But what kind of edits are permitted to be made to the essay? To the Talk page? What is considered acceptable and what is not? Is it anything goes because it's "humor"? I stumbled on this (wish I hadn't) very indirectly and am now trying to, uh, educate myself.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I don't think there are clear rules, but I'm no expert on humor-related pages. I do get the sense that most of them are edited pretty freely. Personally, I tend to regard edits to projectspace pages not in terms of how serious they are but how often they're cited. BEANS may be humor, but it's cited pretty regularly in "serious" discussions. Any of them should be editable, but the most cited ones are probably more likely to get reverted pending discussion. Meh. Nonzero effort is typically more effort than I'm interested to spend on humor pages. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- You sure you're not thinking about WP:BEANS?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am, and see the subpage as part of that page (it was created not long after WP:BEANS was). I say do whatever editing you want to it and see what happens. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- I saw the odd relationship, but they are two separate essays. BEANS has a real purpose and is cited often (e.g., by me at SPI), but the other is at best garbage (IMO). I don't know what page you mean me to edit to see what happens, so I can't try what you suggest.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am, and see the subpage as part of that page (it was created not long after WP:BEANS was). I say do whatever editing you want to it and see what happens. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- You sure you're not thinking about WP:BEANS?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Border patrol
I don't know what to do about this - currently the alien vs. migrant dispute. The posters, like Trump who they admire, are not interested in facts. Any suggestion? deisenbe (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for following up. I responded on the talk page. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2021
| ||||||
Category:Pizza of New York City has been nominated for renaming
Category:Pizza of New York City has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2021
| ||||||
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace
The article All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 15:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Seeking help with edit request for Manhattan West
Hi Rhododendrites. I am Marlee, and I found your name listed as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City. Therefore, I thought you might be interested in an edit request I recently posted for the "Site and structures" section of Talk:Manhattan West. I am asking for your help to implement the edit request, which adds information and improves the overall content of that section. Whether you implement all or part of the request, I will be grateful. Thanks so much. Marlee Neff for Brookfield Properties (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gallican on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bengal tiger on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 48
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Saturday Feb 5: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon (and monthlong campaign)
| February 5, 12-2pm: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a virtual Metropolitan Museum of Art edit-a-thon Saturday afternoon (12-2pm) with partners AfroCROWD and Black Lunch Table. To join the livestream from your computer or smartphone, just watch at this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. Our focus will be on the exhibition Before Yesterday We Could Fly inspired by Seneca Village, and featured art, artists, history and culture of the African diaspora. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! We are also running a Met Afrofuturist chat channel on our Wikimedia NYC Discord server for the whole monthlong campaign.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 05:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dream (American group) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhode Island county labeled map
Template:Rhode Island county labeled map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Winter Olympics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community
| Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community | |
|---|---|
|
Hi Wiki-Yorkers, We are reaching out as part of our community-building efforts at Wikimedia NYC. Our regional group is engaged in a strategic planning process to sharpen our strategy for the next three years, and we would like your input. Given your connection to us and your experience with Wikimedia NYC, I would be grateful if you would be willing to share some of your perspectives and insights as we think about our next chapter. Attached is an anonymous survey, which will remain active until February 28. Responses will go directly to Barretto Consulting and the Wikimedia NYC board will receive responses in aggregate and to identify cross-cutting themes. Please take some time to answer it and share your thoughts with us.
Thank you so much. We appreciate all your ideas and community spirit. | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2022
| ||||||
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing wiki-essay and cases
Hi, I wasn't randomly select you for the input on wiki-policy/guideline, that would defeat the purpose, I am going to ask the same all the major contributors to wiki-essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, and since you are the second largest contributor of the text there, I was wondering if you are still interested in matters covered in the essay, and if you are, would you be interested in looking at one interesting case - if you would, I would then present you with the specifics.--౪ Santa ౪99° 19:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Santasa99: Thanks for the message. I am not a big contributor to that page. It may appear that way, but it's just because of this edit reverting vandalism. :) Are you just looking for input about whether a particular edit/editor has issues with close paraphrasing? If so, you may want to leave a message at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Great idea, thanks, it didn't occur to me to look up for Wikipedia:Copyright problems. I will certainly try there. (Yeah, I used page stats tool, and looked for the largest byte value.) Thanks for the speedy reply and the suggestion.--౪ Santa ౪99° 19:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Confederate States of America on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Piano Quintet (Schumann) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
MetAfrofuturist interim results and Sunday Black Lunch Table office hours
Wanted to share our MetAfrofuturist report of new and improved articles related to the exhibition, and invite you to share at the Black Lunch Table office hours at 12pm Eastern on Sunday!
For a preview, the new articles so far are: Before Yesterday We Could Fly, Yinka Ilori, Zizipho Poswa, Thomas Commeraw, Flying Africans, Period room, and Letter 47 (Seneca).
We'd also invite you to join the Discord channel for the rest of February, if you haven't already.--Pharos (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
As far as I'm concerned
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Rhod, you're one of the good eggs around here. So, here's something entirely unoriginal but truly sincere. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC) |
DYK nomination of 2020-22 book banning in the United States
Hello! Your submission of 2020-22 book banning in the United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
- I will allow another editor to review the article. I did enjoy the subject. Bruxton (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I went back to the DYK nomination and gave the article a tick. I think it is an important subject: thank you for writing the article. Also sorry for the delay. Bruxton (talk) 14:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Foreign Secretary on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Feb 23: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| February 23, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 19:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Variable standards on businesses
Hi, thank you for your perfectly reasonable request for a link. My AfD for a New York icecream shop is Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mikey_Likes_It_Ice_Cream. I might be completely wrong about this one; there are three shops in existence now, I believe, so it might qualify as a notable chain. I didn't like the standard of references; some are in what I would consider good sources, but they turn out to be interviews, or filler-stuff, the sort of human-interest that gets stuck in a vacant place on a low-news day, or they're more about some celebrity who's decided to visit the ice-cream shop than the shop (raising the question of whether this makes the shop notable because a celebrity likes it, or whether that's a bit too close to inherited notability). I would really like to see one or two good references that are not interviews, that are in-depth, independent and that don't look as though they were generated by Microsoft's PR department (there seems to have been a mutually-beneficial arrangement between Microsoft and Mikey's ice-cream, but whether it's notable I'm not sure; Microsoft do a lot of advertising, as you'd expect from any such company). I am giving you the link here because I don't want to encourage spurious other-stuff-exists arguments in the petzone AfD. But I do feel that we tend to be more sympathetic to businesses in the US or UK than businesses in the middle east. On a related note, we accept an article on a place in the US provided there is some evidence that someone once lived there, even if it's a mere address in an ancient newspaper - but we reject articles on complete new housing estates in other parts of the world because we're suspicious that they sound as though they're advertising the developer - even though they are tangibly places where thousands of people live. It's a difficult one to get right. I also don't want to solicit people to visit Mikey's AfD with any particular viewpoint; it's just a discussion, anyone's welcome, and I'm happy to be proven wrong. Elemimele (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Elemimele: Thanks for the message. Mikey Likes It looks like a tough call. I'd have to dig in a bit more, but what you're talking about seems like one element of Wikipedia's systemic bias. I don't think it's that people aren't sympathetic or that they don't want more articles about topics from outside North America/Europe, but (a) not everywhere has the publishing customs and infrastructure to generate many of what Wikipedia considers "reliable sources", and (b) even when they do, there aren't enough people here who know the language and are familiar with the sources. We might be able to determine what the one or two best sources are for a region, but have a hard time differentiating the rest of the spectrum from good to terrible. Mikey Likes It is in one of the largest media markets in the world, with dozens of papers/sites we consider reliable for food and business reporting. Most of the bigger publications in NYC also follow some strict journalistic standards when it comes to promotional content (certainly not all, though). That doesn't mean I think it's notable (I don't know). The last thing is: business articles are a category of article at AfD that does depend on who shows up to the discussion, because several people at AfD are very sensitive to what they perceive as promotion, and paint "promotional content" with a broad brush. Most of the time I appreciate this, but it's frustrating sometimes. It typically requires detailed source evaluation to push back in those cases when someone wants to push back. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: I think you've hit the nail on the head. It's not deliberate, but it's very hard for us in New York or London (I'm not quite in London, but I can see through London eyes fairly easily) to look at something like the Mikey Likes it ice-cream thing and say "that's not promotional, I know what promotional looks like in London, and that one isn't, it's just that it's in a place that is home to a lot of important people and a lot of big news businesses, so people will have heard of it, and it's made a genuine splash" - But I can't look through Kuwaiti eyes and recognise whether a newspaper there, writing about an ice-cream chain there, is merely promotional fluff or a genuine indication of notability. And as you say, many in WP err on the side of caution when it comes to businesses. I've been quite frustrated by a few AfDs that have ended up deleting major housing projects in the middle east, which amount to complete new city suburbs housing tens of thousands of people, because most of the sources are accounts of the funding being granted to produce the things, the builders being proud to have delivered only 3 years late, or minor news articles about crimes that have been committed by the residents. This contrasts oddly with all the AfDs for a railway siding in Iowa, which end with "keep" because someone's tracked down a local newspaper from 100 years ago that says someone ran over a chicken that belonged to Mrs Smith of that address (and therefore it's an inhabited place, and thus notable, even if nothing happened there beyond one squashed chicken). It's not a deliberate bias, but it's hard to know what to do about it! I'm not going to argue the Mikey one as I don't care much either way; it's not my expertise and if New Yorkers say it's notable, then
so be it. AfD is for discussion, and if we can't discuss and accept the conclusion, what's the point? Elemimele (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brian Rose (podcaster) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility
The article Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Sunday Feb 27: MetAfrofuturist End-of-Month Zoom Meetup
Join our MetAfrofuturist End-of-Month Zoom Meetup - more details forthcoming at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/MetAfrofuturist#Sunday Feb_27: End-of-Month Zoom Meetup.
Time: Feb 27, 2022 02:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
- Join Zoom Meeting
- https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88668086189?pwd=Zy83MjZCK0djeTZkdFVqZkpjUlZSQT09
- Meeting ID: 886 6808 6189
- Passcode: AfroFuture
You are also welcome to join our Discord channel for this campaign:
--Pharos (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sports teams) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:US Census population on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Interesting that there is actually a note already at the bottom of that section saying it's good practice to leave a note at the discussion. I've proposed strengthening the statement. valereee (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Going to leave a comment there. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes
Nicely done
I wanted to complement this edit [1]. It's a great (and sadly too uncommon) example of respecting the logic of a person even while disagreeing with the outcome. We would probably have far fewer embittered disagreements if more people followed that lead. Springee (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.- Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
- AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
- Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
- GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
- Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
- SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
- Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
A nod of appreciation
.png)
|
Connoisseur of Fine Imagery |
| I just submitted my first featured picture candidate and noticed you nominated one of my photos in the past, Thank you for doing that. I really appreciate the recognition, even if it didn't get the votes. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC) |
- @Needsmoreritalin: No problem. I should say there are two Featured Picture processes. One is here on Wikipedia; the other is over on Wikimedia Commons. It's a sister site to Wikipedia -- it's where all the images are hosted and also serves as the world's largest free media resource. The Commons FP process gets a lot more participation, and involves more photographers. I used to participate in both, but found the chronic lack of participation at the process here too frustrating (and the idiosyncratic opinions about the relationship between images and articles). Commons just focuses on the photo, typically. Not to dissuade you from nominating here -- you should -- but you may also want to nominate there. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: Thanks for the advice. I may try that. To be honest, I was in a photo contest one time, and I didn't like what it turned me into. I came in second, and I decided I can't be competitive with my photos, so I post some on Wikipedia, and I sell some for charity, and its made it fun and not stressful. I saw some of your images too, and they are wonderful. Needsmoreritalin talk \\ 01:54 4 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for 2020–22 book banning in the United States
On 7 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020–22 book banning in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a spokesperson for the American Library Association told ABC News in late 2021 that she had "never seen such a widespread effort to remove books on racial and gender diversity"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020-22 book banning in the United States. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020–22 book banning in the United States), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 12,559 views (1046.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bauhaus (band) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility
On 11 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility in Brooklyn is the largest commingled recycling facility in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sunset Park Material Recovery Facility), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2022
| ||||||
DYK for Urinal target
On 14 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Urinal target, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to a Schiphol Airport official, installing pictures of flies in urinals reduced "spillage" by 80 per cent? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Urinal target. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Urinal target), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- The trouble with this sort of topic at DYK is that it tends to get hidden at the bottom, in the quirky slot, even when you have some good pictures. That's what happened to my recent tinkle and now Dumelow's Sons of Neptune are being flushed away too. Still, I did manage to get top billing once... Andrew🐉(talk) 12:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,144 views (595 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that was good as mine only got 4,397 and Dumelow's 5,602. You win the contest! Andrew🐉(talk) 15:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't know there was a "quirky slot", but this does seem like it qualifies. I cropped the image, but could've probably cropped it more to just be a picture of the fly. Meh. I don't always know what criteria the set-makers go by. I mentioned in the DYK nom that I was weakly tempted to add an alternative hook based on the Apis joke in the article, but it felt a little too crass. Would've gotten more clicks, I bet, though. :) 16:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that was good as mine only got 4,397 and Dumelow's 5,602. You win the contest! Andrew🐉(talk) 15:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in New South Wales on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
March songs
 |
Thank you for support in the RfC for DYK - music with a chance to listen, - the piece by Anna Korsun begins after about one hour, and the voices afterwards call "Freiheit!" instead of "Freude". Music every day, pictured in songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link, Gerda. Always nice to see a saw :) but very unsettling to my ears. Almost like some of the post-rock I listened to years ago (sans guitars). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- agree about unsettling sirens --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- The Prayer is on the Main page, finally + new flowers --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Mar 27: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn
| March 27, 11am-2pm: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering between the local Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation at Sahadi's tent in Brooklyn's Industry City. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dorothy Hewett on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
| Online and in-person events | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join us for:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 13:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Rhododendrites,
This is to let you know that File:Palace of Fine Arts (16794p).jpg, a featured picture you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 26, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-03-26. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
|
|
The Palace of Fine Arts is a monumental structure in the Marina District of San Francisco, California. It was originally constructed for the 1915 Panama–Pacific International Exposition to exhibit works of art. Completely rebuilt from 1964 to 1974, it is the only structure from the exposition that survives on site. The most prominent building of the complex, a 162-foot-high (49-meter) open rotunda, is enclosed by a lagoon on one side, and adjoins a large, curved exhibition center on the other side, separated from the lagoon by colonnades. Photograph credit: Rhododendrites
Recently featured:
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 49
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
- New library collections
- Blog post published detailing technical improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
very cool pics, thx! :)
Fbrh47 (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
A few items, re NYC meetup events
hi there. it was good to see you on the last Zoom call. just want to thank you, for being so helpful, and for providing some helpful data and information on the articles that I presented during the call.
- Just wanted to ask one question, or make a suggestion, re the meetup today at Industry City today, in Brooklyn. do you think you could please take just a few photographs, and post them on the page for the NYC meetup? i think that would be very helpful, if you want. is that ok? thanks.
- Also, here is another idea. I'm thinking that sometime in the future, maybe we could actually organize a zoom call which would be speifically for multiple local Wikipedia meetups. it could either be simply for various local meetups groups from around the USA, or maybe it could even be centered upon or based upon one or more specific topical areas. for me, obviously if I organize it, then probably I would choose to focus it around areas related to history. right now, it is just an idea, but I just wanted to mention that. Feel free to express any comments on this, if you want.
I really appreciate your help. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Sm8900 - Unfortunately I did not take any photos at the event yesterday. I think a couple people did. Jim.henderson had his camera.
- Regarding a call for multiple groups, have you seen WP:WALRUS? It's basically representatives from various US-based groups. I don't know if there have been meetups for topic-based groups. I suspect a lot of people (including me :) ) are rather over-Zoomed, but I'd be curious to hear how it goes. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- hi. thanks for that link! Actually, I was not aware of that. It's good to hear that. Thanks for that info! I think I might have a few ideas on how perhaps we might help to build up that resource, and nurture and promote some possible ways to increase participation. I'd like to think this over for a little bit. but yes, perhaps we could revisit this topic again, and look at some ways to work to develop this particular idea. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taw on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Your thoughts on a page
Very nice to see you at the Wiki NYC meetup last week.
I was hoping to ask your advice once again regarding the Village Preservation page Talk:Greenwich_Village_Society_for_Historic_Preservation. I agree with your comments on the editorial changes and the POV framing that's taking place on the page. So what are the next steps that can be taken here to repair the page and make it more accurate/neutral? It seems as if the initial editor who introduced the changes in the page won't accept anything, and I'm probably not the right person to make any changes with my COI.
Any guidance here would be appreciated! DVillageP11 (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- For any page watchers, the context here is DVillageP11 joined a Wikimedia New York City event, which is open to all, asking for advice along the lines as on that page. They got a mix of advice, and I largely said there what I had already said on the talk page. DVillageP11, the reason I'm giving this context is because off-wiki canvassing/coordination is a big concern for Wikipedians and I want to be clear that I was already involved on the talk page, didn't say anything in that meeting that I didn't say on the talk page, and am not continuing to participate because of any sort of off-wiki arrangement. Like I said, conflict of interest is messy business here. :)
- I think you're doing fine. It'll be slow. I'm concerned about some of Snooganssnoogans' edits alignment with core content policies, but if I just went in and undid them right away I would risk compounding rather than fixing the problem. I'd give it a few more days. It would be ideal if other voices got involved, but the next step to do that would probably be an WP:RFC, and it would be better for one of us without a COI to start that process if it comes to it. In the meantime, you could open a new section with another proposed change (ideally with citations to support it). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)