Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Rul Joules

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
205 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nothing by mouth (talk) Add sources
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Yellow grease (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Marjorie Flack (talk) Add sources
65 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Weston Woods Studios (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dorothy P. Lathrop (talk) Add sources
192 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C The Thief of Always (talk) Add sources
650 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Jell-O (talk) Cleanup
119 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Natural skin care (talk) Cleanup
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jeff Gottesfeld (talk) Cleanup
50 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Iodine in biology (talk) Expand
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Holt McDougal (talk) Expand
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mehdi Azar Yazdi (talk) Expand
61 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kiwiana (talk) Unencyclopaedic
83 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Book scanning (talk) Unencyclopaedic
69 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Fictional book (talk) Unencyclopaedic
66 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ecological farming (talk) Merge
242 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Food irradiation (talk) Merge
176 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Information and media literacy (talk) Merge
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Karen Dawn (talk) Wikify
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Feed manufacturing (talk) Wikify
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Electracy (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase family (talk) Orphan
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kompetitive allele specific PCR (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Andreas Stefik (talk) Orphan
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Permanent crop (talk) Stub
222 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Karen M. McManus (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Plant Cell (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start The Cat Who Came for Christmas (talk) Stub
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Anijsmelk (talk) Stub
99 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mare milk (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Rul Joules, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Lolkikmoddi-h3t3 :D (talk) 21:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One Cool Friend moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, One Cool Friend, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Duke Ellington: The Piano Prince and His Orchestra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Martin's Big Words: the Life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rul Joules! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bad Guys: Episode 1 (November 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timmy Failure (Book Series) (November 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The City Beautiful (novel) has been accepted

[edit]
The City Beautiful (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Grandits has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Grandits. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Three Little Gators (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Here Comes the Cat (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Here Comes the Cat (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Fletcher and the Falling Leaves. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mean One has been accepted

[edit]
The Mean One, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thatguy1987 (talk) 14:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Compusolus (talk) 07:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Leo: A Ghost Story

[edit]

Hello, Rul Joules,

Thank you for creating Leo: A Ghost Story.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article relies only on one source. If possible, try to cite more reliable sources such as this New York Times review. Do also note that per MOS:QUOTE: brief quotations are fine, but lengthy and/or excessive quotes are "incompatible with an encyclopedic writing style and may be a copyright infringement."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bennv123}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bennv123 (talk) 14:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Editage (November 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tidying up the article I published today

[edit]

Just wanted to say thanks for the numerous small fixes you made to Me and My Dysphoria Monster, as well as adding the photo and linking it to a couple of portals. It's only been a few hours since it's been live, but now it already looks complete! (At least for the moment.) Neuroxic (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rul Joules, you have uploaded this book cover and 26 other children's book covers to Wikimedia Commons, claiming that these images are freely licensed under CC-BY SA 4.0. These book covers are copyrighted and the only people who can freely license these images are the copyright holders themselves. Please go to Commons and have these copyrighted book covers deleted. No copyright protected content is allowed on Wikimedia Commons.
Study the Non-free image policy. You can upload any book cover that complies with that policy here on English Wikipedia instead. Cullen328 (talk) 01:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weapons (Ava Max song) (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Power point (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weapons (Ava Max song) (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Power point (disambiguation)

[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Power point (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laughing Elephant Books (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Allegation of paid editing (and looking at the page history, probably), as well as generally not being notable, means it probably doesn't have a rightful place here.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 children's books indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Grandits has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Grandits. Thanks! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tiana (TV series) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tiana (TV series). Thanks! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choristers Guild (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiana (TV series) (January 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VickKiang was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
VickKiang (talk) 02:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Grandits (January 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pepot Atienza (February 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Modussiccandi (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mush-Mush & the Mushables (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 18:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:One Cool Friend

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rul Joules. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Cool Friend, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Rul Joules. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Duke Ellington: The Piano Prince and His Orchestra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Rul Joules. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin's Big Words: the Life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:One Cool Friend

[edit]

Hello, Rul Joules. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One Cool Friend".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rul Joules. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Duke Ellington: The Piano Prince and His Orchestra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Here Comes the Cat

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rul Joules. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Here Comes the Cat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Rul Joules. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fletcher and the Falling Leaves, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Here Comes the Cat

[edit]

Hello, Rul Joules. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Here Comes the Cat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Calkins (May 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reassessed this as C class. A class requires two impartial reviews. Schierbecker (talk) 07:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]