Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Securityreligion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Securityreligion, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nav Yuvak Dal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nav Yuvak Dal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable political party. The most that can be verified about this party is that they exist. No indications that they have stood candidates in any elections.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Shukla (April 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dial911 (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Securityreligion! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dial911 (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soubhik Das for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soubhik Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soubhik Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soubhik Das for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soubhik Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soubhik Das (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm KingAndGod. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Soubhik Das— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KingAndGod 15:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Soubhik Das, you may be blocked from editing. You have twice moved this page from article space to draft space and then back to article space, apparently in order to stop deletion discussions. If it is moved a third time, a report will be made at WP:AN and a request will be made to salt the title against further moves. Let the deletion discussion run to completion without further disruption. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Soubhik Das. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Massive Networks

[edit]

Hello Securityreligion,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Massive Networks for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANi discussion notification

[edit]

I have raised your activity at ANi for Administrator attention. [1]You are welcome to comment there. Legacypac (talk) 04:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]