User talk:Squidb4ll
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Squidb4ll! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 20:29, Saturday, November 11, 2023 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Squidb4ll! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 20:37, Saturday, November 11, 2023 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Squidb4ll! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 20:43, Saturday, November 11, 2023 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soundtracks for the Blind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paste. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Squidb4ll, and welcome to Women in Red. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: BitchSlut has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Waqar💬 20:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Squidb4ll. Thank you for your work on Sarah Gertrude Banks. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Very well constructed article - very high quality.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Aszx5000 (talk) 11:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 400 Degreez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ringer.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for creating Man vs. bear! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC) |
Nomination of Man or bear for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man or bear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
BLP
[edit]Please review the WP:BLP policy. This edit is problematic: [1] you've stated something about a living person that not only isn't stated by the source it's also an opinion piece. Opinion pieces should always be attributed and material from them should not be written in WP:Wikivoice. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the notice. I will make sure to read the policy and fix the issue with my writing to refrain from making further violations in the future. Squidb4ll (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Reagan (song) has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dan arndt (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scientists & Engineers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypebeast.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How Much a Dollar Cost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consequence.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Re: File:Man or bear.png
[edit]Hey, good work creating File:Man or bear.png. I don't know if you received any feedback on this, but a few things stuck out to me, and I was wondering if you were opposed to fixing them or considering some changes to improve the presentation of the image:
- Forest landscape. The placement of the woman, bear, and man are placed too far into the background. Moving them closer, into the foreground would achieve a more realistic look.
- Woman. This one is a bit more difficult. When we look at the original image, we can determine a few things. The average painting is hung at eye-level at approximately 1.5 meters from the floor, or approximately five feet. Knowing this we can determine the height of the woman and compare it to the height of the man. Given her heels, we can add that measurement as well.
- Bear. Personally, I think you got the size right on this, but that's just my uninformed impression.
- Man. I would probably have to do some high school trig to determine the height of the man here, which is doable based on the distance of the man to the fence and the angle, but just eyeballing it alone, this man looks tall, perhaps just under 1.9 meters. Given the above, I propose increasing his height in relation to the woman.
I suspect you know all of this already, but I'm interested in any opinion you might have. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks for the analysis and suggestions! I was not thinking that hard about proportion when I made the image and I'll take your word for it that you know what you're talking about, but I think I've already deleted the files on my computer I used to make the image at this point. But if I have the time soon I could double check my trash folder and redo anything if I didn't delete it Squidb4ll (talk) 00:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, no worries. The only reason I even bring this up is because last week I was taking photos in a coastal, California forest. So I immediately recalled it, having spent some time pouring over the photos. If you look at the original forest pic you used as a landscape template, you can see how placing the figures farther in the foreground solves most of the issues, other than the height of the man. Thanks for replying and enjoy your week. Viriditas (talk) 00:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you too Squidb4ll (talk) 00:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, no worries. The only reason I even bring this up is because last week I was taking photos in a coastal, California forest. So I immediately recalled it, having spent some time pouring over the photos. If you look at the original forest pic you used as a landscape template, you can see how placing the figures farther in the foreground solves most of the issues, other than the height of the man. Thanks for replying and enjoy your week. Viriditas (talk) 00:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging