User talk:T.J.Hebert

T.J.Hebert, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Come to Buffalo Wild Wings. Eleanor W Smith (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Eleanor W SmithEleanor W Smith (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite :( Bmogro1 (talk) 22:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)bmogro1

Hi T.J.Hebert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Online ambassador welcome

Hello T.J.,

let me introduce myself, Graeme Bartlett as an on-line ambassador to your Wikipedia work. I am here to help you with the Wikipedia technical and social world. You can ask me questions or chat to me on my talk page at User talk:Graeme Bartlett, or you can email me by using this page: Special:EmailUser/Graeme Bartlett. I will be looking at your work on Wikipedia to see what I can suggest to you. Once your page goes live I will see if I can nominate it for the WP:Did you know to get it listed on the front page. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

User:T.J.Hebert/sandbox

Hi, it is good to see you get started on your sandbox work. Did you learn how to link to other pages? like this: [[volcanic eruption]] which results in this: volcanic eruption. To do references there is a special <ref></ref> set of tags, in which the footnote for the reference is placed. Normally authors and writings would not get a wikilink themselves, unless they were notable enough to get an article in Wikipedia. Also remember Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and your page is not a paper appearing in a journal, so a different more explanatory style should be used. Assume our audience has only a secondary school education! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Don's Edits

Overview

• lacking a nice big 'bold' title to tell me that I have found the article I want, is this article about the beds or the eruption?
• "according to [3]" is confusing, its better to just say Haynes et al

The overview has great information, lots of info about age et cetera. But at the end of the overview, I dont really know what you are talking about. Is this a bed that is buried? how deep is it? how thick is it? Can i see this on the surface?

Deicke K-Bentonite Layer

• gets a bit redundant in the middle, you mention its meter-thickness 3 times
• do the different kinds of bentonite mean different things?

Current Research Efforts

Brief but good. Presents material well

Review

You have a lot of information on your page, but it is somewhat scattered. I am still not sure if the page is about the eruption or the belt. Obviously, they are very closely tied, and writing an article about one will include the other, but you need to have a core to the article, something that the whole thing centers around. I like the figure, simple, but tells me a great deal. There are a number of spelling issues as well, but that is easy to fix

Drhood2938 (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

T.J.Hebert

Hey it is T.J.Hebert, thank you for restoring my sandbox it was an accident. However, I am trying to make a new sandbox and I am unsure on how to that. Thank you for restoring my page. T.J.Hebert — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.J.Hebert (talk • contribs) 21:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello T.J,

I expected that something went a tad awry there, since it is not often an article writer would intentionally remove an article that is obviously of good quality! What i think you are running into here is that your original sandbox became a redirect to the article you wrote once you moved it to the article space. This is an automatic consequence of page moves - the old title is automatically set up to point to the new article.

Often this is practical, but in this case i think you simply want your sandbox back. Just follow the below steps:

1. Move to your sandbox which can be found at User:T.J.Hebert/sandbox
2. You will be redirected to the article you wrote. However, you will notice that right under the title there will be a small-print text that states "Redirected from User:T.J.Hebert/sandbox"
3. Click the "User:T.J.Hebert/sandbox" link in the "Redirected from User:T.J.Hebert/sandbox". Now you will be taken to the sandbox page which will state that it is a redirect.
4. Simply edit your sandbox page and clear the page. And presto; you have a new empty sandbox all ready for usage without being forwarded to the article space once you try to access it.

One very different matter that caught my eye: Did you perchance format part of the references inside the Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers by hand? If you happen to have the DOI for your reference at hand you may find this website to be exceptionally practical. Just enter the DOI on it, and it will fill create an entire filled-out Wikipedia cite template without having to enter any other data. Also, if you plan to use a fairly large amount of references or wish to reuse them across the page, you may want to have a look at ProveIt, as it can really make life easier when working with references.

Hope this helps, and kind regards. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey thank you I was trying to clear my sandbox. Could you please check to make sure I did it correctly. Also yes I did do the references by hand. Would I add the DOI to the reference? T.J.Hebert (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The sandbox itself look a-ok right now. As for the DOI: just navigate to the link provided, and paste the DOI itself in the textbox and press "Load". It will then display a new text area that contains the formatted reference which can be pasted straight into the Wikipedia page.

For example: If we paste the DOI for your reference "DID A VOLCANIC MEGA-ERUPTION CAUSE GLOBAL COOLING DURING THE LATE ORDOVICIAN?" ("10.2110/palo.2010.p10-069r") in and press load, it will create this citation:

<ref name="HerrmannMacleod2010">{{cite journal|last1=Herrmann|first1=A. D.|last2=Macleod|first2=K. G.|last3=Leslie|first3=S. A.|title=DID A VOLCANIC MEGA-ERUPTION CAUSE GLOBAL COOLING DURING THE LATE ORDOVICIAN?|journal=PALAIOS|volume=25|issue=12|year=2010|pages=831–836|issn=0883-1351|doi=10.2110/palo.2010.p10-069r}}</ref>

If you would paste this in the article it would show up in the reference list like below. All the known information for the DOI you entered (Author, journal title, release year, page title) are automatically filled in without having to type anything manually. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Introducing myself

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

GEOL4131 Woodlark Basin Review

Tyler, you have put up some nice maps. I suggest you label the satellite image so that its easier to pick the boundaries of the basin as well as see neighbouring locations. Also, in the tectonic map of the world, you can add a box around your basin so that it stands out. Since you haven't been able to find out data on sedimentary fill, I suggest you add information about the igneous and metamorphic rocks in the basin. This paper might be of use to you: Zirakparvar, N.A, Baldwin S.L., Vervoort J.D., April 2013, The origin and geochemical evolution of the Woordlark rift of Papua New Guinea. You can find it through LSU libraries.

There's a minor spelling error in Papua New Guinea in a couple of places. Also, capitalize proper nouns like Pacific.

Good Luck!

Samiha.naseem (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Woodlark Basin Satellite Image close up.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Woodlark Basin Satellite Image close up.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Basic Fault map of the woodlark basin.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Basic Fault map of the woodlark basin.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Woodlark Basin Faults.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Woodlark Basin Faults.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:A close up image of the Woodlark Basin.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:A close up image of the Woodlark Basin.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Basic Fault map of the woodlark basin revision.jpg

✗plicit 14:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)