User talk:TakiLakjsdf

This is TakiLakjsdf's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kody Russey (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kody Russey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TakiLakjsdf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Pribula (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Pribula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2023 Conference USA Football Championship Game

added a link pointing to Aaron Taylor

2023 Mountain West Conference Football Championship Game

added a link pointing to Allison Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Arizona Wildcats football team

I'm not going to do anything because their season will be over in about 5 hours, I just want to make sure you under the rule when it comes to creating the page for the following season. With all sports, the long standing rule is waiting until the season is over, this includes creating the page the day the season will end hours before their final game.--Rockchalk7 17 00:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last year, and this year me and many other people have made wiki articles. Some examples include me making PSU's article, and also someone making Bama's article. But thanks for the info. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 04:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also all the current CFP teams have articles. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it's happening with articles and has happened in the past, doesn't necessarily make it right. Please remember that going forward. I'll be taking care of those other articles.--Rockchalk7 17 05:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Memphis Tigers football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Memphis Tigers football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an amount of sources I should get to, or around?

Thanks, TakiLakjsdf (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, many CFB season articles don't have many sources in the offseason, because no games have happened. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 01:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no particular "amount", but we look for significant coverage independent of the subject. A couple more of different sites (etc) would be good probably. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 02:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as refered to earlier, newer pages for seasons that haven't started don't have many sources, and the only sources would be a schedule, roster, coach bio, etc. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those would usually be from the school's website. TakiLakjsdf (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Memphis Tigers football team (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add secondary reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Memphis Tigers football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 23:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Pribula (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable sources for every stats and life details.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Pribula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bakersfield Blaze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Russell (baseball).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of your deletion

I reverted your deletion of the seeding information I entered on 2024 Atlantic Sun men's basketball tournament. The data were clearly marked as the seeding as of today. The information is useful to readers, since the teams have either one or two games remaining in the regular season. It is intended to be temporary. In addition, once the seeding becomes final, much of the information will already be there, making editing easier. Taxman1913 (talk) 02:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caelen Carson has been accepted

Caelen Carson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beau Pribula (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:PRIMARYSOURCES doesn't show notability, instead they are used to verify certain details of information which, may be taken by newspapers when reporting, e.t.c. We advise editors to cite WP:SECONDARYSOURCES (books, newspapers news, journals, magazines, e.t.c) as a means of establishing WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beau Pribula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]