Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Terry Carrick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to William Lawson (co-operator and agriculturalist) (1836–1916), of Brayton Aspatria, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. TheMikeWassup doc? 13:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be sensible to remove the page entirely, so have requested its deletion. Readers are much more likely to find the new page than this one. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terry. I have had a quick look at the William Lawson article, and can see most of the issues. The first was the title. No-one is going to link to your article if is has a name like William Lawson (co-operator and agriculturalist) (1836-1916) of Brayton Aspatria, because all of that text needs to go into their link, whereas someone can more easily link to William Lawson (businessman). We like snappy titles on Wikipedia. Also, to get to the article if you are not jumping from a link, requires you to type all of that in.

The manual of style WP:MOS suggests you need a lead section, which has a brief summary of the content of the article. This should include the subject in bold, so would be something like

William Lawson was an agriculturalist blah blah...

The lead should reflect the length of the article, but I usually put in a short one while I am building the article, and expand it once the content is organised. You then need to split the subject matter into suitable sections. Each section has a title, like this ==Achievements==, which will appear like this:

Achievements

[edit]

and will get built into a table of contents just below your lead section. If you need to sub-divide a section, you can use three equals (===Subsection===). I don't do much on people, but take a look at William Jessop to give you an idea of what a Wikipedia article looks like. I'll be happy to pop round and talk this over with you soon. Keep up the good work.

P.S. It would be good to edit your user page, just to say something like: Hi, I'm Terry. I'm interested in ... It took me a while to find you with no user page set up. Bob1960evens (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Terry Carrick. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 15:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Leaving messages on talk pages

[edit]

Hi Terry, I have just followed the link to Mike Lynch's talk page above, and noticed you left a message there. If you sign such messages with 4 tildes (~~~~), then it puts in a link back to your user page, which makes it easier for everyone. Like this one here --> Bob1960evens (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving William Lawson

[edit]

Hi Terry, I have moved the article to William Lawson (co-operator) for you, and fixed the disambiguation page. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bob I have made the changes to the document that we discussed. I would welcome any other comments. Terry Terry Carrick (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terry, the article is looking a lot better. However, it is still quite light on references. The financial failures section, for instance, has lots of numbers in it, but no ref at all. Where could I check, for instance, that the manure works made £235, and not £2.25M? I think it needs to be read critically for grammer. So, in early life, it says: he received his education at home, where he later declared: "He learned as little as possible." Either he declared "I learned as little as possible" or he declared that he learned as little as possible. Only schizophrenics speak of themselves in the third person. Then we have: His parents, he declared, "Were more anxious...". The "were" is in the middle of a sentence, and so should not be capitalised. Then we have: Later recalling, "I found himself in my 25th year..." There is a mix of first and third person, and it is a sub-clause, not a sentence. Since it is not obviously connected to the previous sentence, it could be: Later he recalled ... Sometimes it is easier to print it out and mark it up with a highlighter.
The wikilink Town Gas needs to be sorted, ie [[Town Gas|town gas]], so that it looks right in the middle of a senctence. I think 'rural rides' needs explaining or rewording. I think I would say, read it ruthlessly. Then the lead paragraph is far too small for the size of article. It needs to summarise the contents, rather than draw conclusions. I think the conclusions would probably count as original research, ie, they are your conclusions, rather than being based on a published summary of the guy's life. Wikipedia frowns on this sort of original research, so you need to ensure that his main achievements are clearly described in the text, and if there is no published summary, then readers should be able to draw their own conclusions as to what he did. It is always a bit more difficult when the main source is a primary one, rather than a secondary one, that is, it is written by the guy who the article is about.
I hope this is constructive. It is worth browsing round Wikipedia to look at the style guide, and read some of the good articles and featured articles. Generally, if the article is written as part of a project, then the Discussion page will have an information box about the project, and ratings. They are not always as up-to-date as the article, but anything rated 'GA' or 'FA' has been peer reviewed, and articles rated 'B' will have been assessed by others within that particular project. For GA and FA articles, there is usually a summary of what needed fixing for it to pass the review, which can be quite instructive. Happy editing! Bob1960evens (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PS I'm not sure the post office is still open for business. Have a look here. [1] Bob1960evens (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions on William Lawson

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia,

Some other editors have made good suggestions, and I wanted to offer more. The main shortcoming that I see with the article is that it appears largely to be your own original research although I could be wrong. You make many statements that seem to be historical judgments, without referencing reliable sources. You should also be careful to write from the neutral point of view. Any superlatives or unusually colorful language should be in the form of brief quotes from reliable sources, rather than your own words. In other words, this man is significant because of what the reliable sources say, rather than what you conclude yourself. Always remember that Wikipedia editors are not considered reliable sources, even those with PhDs, unless their work has been published elsewhere. You should also make an effort to Wikify your article, adding links to other Wikipedia articles that explain terms that readers may wish to understand better. Put yourself in the place of a reader in the USA or India or Jamaica who may not know the people and places you mention. Link to them. I hope my suggestions prove useful. Feel free to ask questions. Cullen328 (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well summed up Jim! TheMikeWassup doc? 12:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sir Wilfrid Wybergh Lawson, 1st Baronet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kamkek (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terry, I see you've changed Thomas Holliday's nickname from "Toff" to "Tosh". MacRusgail added the nickname "Toff", and referenced 'Godwin, Terry Complete Who's Who of International Rugby (Cassell, 1987, ISBN 0713718382)'. Also, ESPNscrum also has the nickname "Toff", being an Aspatrian you're probably right, but have you got a reference stating "Tosh". Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can only speak for the people of Aspatria. I knew Tosh well and often bought items from his shop. He was a mild mannered humble sort of person not a Toff at all. Up hear in the far north people called Thomas or Thompson are often given the nickname Tosh.

As for references I will have. I have newspaper reports of most of Apatria games from 1878 to about 1990. I have published a book relating to the history of the club. Unfortunately I will not be available after tomorrow for a few weeks but upon my return I will add all references to the Rugby articles I have added.Terry Carrick (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checked my records

Holliday was known at the time as T.E. Holiday, Tom, Holliday and Tosh no mention anywhere in the local papers of Toff. I guess this was a southerner who failed to understand the strong Cumberland accent. On another matter Cumberland won the cup in 1924 not Cumberland and Westmorland.

Cumbria (Cumberland, Westmorland and parts of North Lancs) won it in the 90's against Cornwall

Regards

terryTerry Carrick (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the lead on your new article, Aspatria Agricultural Cooperative Society is very confusing and gives the reader little or no context of where the company was formed, who formed it, etc. I suggest that you read WP:Lead and see what kinds of information should be included therein. I for one, have no clue where Aspartia district is or what it means. You should explain these things, because Wikipedia articles are written for a global audience. If you need any help, or want more feedback, feel free to ask, Sadads (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terry, I have created a talk page behind the Jenny Cowern article, and left a number of suggestions as to what the tags mean, and how the issues can be addressed. Feel free to challenge any or all of them, or drop me a note if you need any help. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sheila Fell article

[edit]

I have been browsing around and noticed that this article is linked to Auerbach, but that is a disambiguation page, and there are 22 people called Auerbach on it. I could not guess which one it should be linked to. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox1

[edit]

Hi, Terry. FYI, I have "commented out" the categories in User:Terry Carrick/Sandbox1 to prevent the page appearing in the mainspace categories while you're still working on it. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can you help how do I change this.Terry Carrick (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To restore the categories you need to remove the "<!--" before the categories and the "-->" after the categories. I see that you did one half and User:PKT did the other half. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aspatria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Carlisle, Allhallows, Bromfield, Ellenborough and Westnewton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aspatria Agricultural College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bill, Directors, English, French, Resolution, Bond, Carlisle, Grant, Certificates, Berwick, Prospectus, Athletic, Qualifications, Spion Kop, First Class, Tamworth and Liquidator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Cadwaladr Bryner Jones, Terry Carrick!

Wikipedia editor FoCuSandLeArN just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good article! cheers FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on FoCuSandLeArN's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cadwaladr Bryner Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, of Brayton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Radical, Zululand, Colonial Secretary, Little England and European

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Kingdom Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, of Isell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isel Hall, Cumberland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curtains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dr William Perry Briggs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hospitalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Kentigern's Church, Aspatria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlisle, William Nicholson and Pinnacles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harriston, Cumbria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew Spark DCM, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlisle and World War 11. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Matthew Spark DCM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 09:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help please. I really don't know what the problem is. How do you define notability. Matthew was not just a soldier, there are millions of those. He was awarded the DCM, which I believe is the next honour down for a non commissioned officer after the VC. He his the Highest decorated soldier in the district to which he lived. I find it hard to understand when I see pages upon pages of articles about minor and in some case insignificant people, who happened to play a game or play an instrument. I suppose if one had an MBE it would be OK. Sorry for going onTerry Carrick (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reflected on the article in question and I have come to the conclusion that the best thing to do all round is to deleted the article on the premise that the subject is not notable. I have not changed my mind relating to the unworthiness of many of the obscure pop stars, sportsmen and so called celebrities that occasionally appear unscathed or beyond criticism. Can someone help to remove the article, as I am not to sure what the procedure is.Terry Carrick (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to be making sudden major additions to more Cumbria village articles being worked on as part of an educational assignment?

[edit]

Yesterday (26/1/2015), you added a lot of material to the Bromfield, Cumbria page. As its Talk page recorded, this was just starting to be worked on by a student on this course that I run: Education Program:University of Portsmouth/Applied Human Geography (Spring 2015)

We check very carefully not just that articles are stubs but also that they have not been edited for at least twelve months, other than by bots or very minor tidying up. We also work with Wikimedia UK, and make full use of their facilities for running courses which includes marking up the articles we are working on. We even got an award for the course at Wikimania last year.

In this case we have had to assign the student a new article to work on. If you start work on another article marked as being used by a course, could you first contact the course via its Talk page? The Wikipedia guidelines for courses like ours say "Established editors should welcome student editors, and students should learn to communicate via the normal Wikipedia channels, such as on article talk pages and user talk pages" -- so could you use the talk page to communicate with us? Bromfield is now water under the bridge, but are you preparing similar big additions for other village articles?

Thanks

Humphrey Southall (Professor of Historical Geography, University of Portsmouth) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humphrey.Southall (talkcontribs) 14:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC) I must apologise for any inconvenience caused. I was not aware that someone else was working on the Bromfield article. I do intend to do some work on the Hayton, Allerdale site also on Hayton Castle and also on a number of the members of the Musgrave family associated with the area. If these have been assigned to others can you please let me knowTerry Carrick (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Terry. Those particular pages sound like they are not on our list for this year. We only assign articles about places which are civil parishes, not people or buildings. They must be marked as stub articles and be very short, so Hayton, Allerdale is already much too long. The course page (Spring 2015 link provided above) does have all the articles currently assigned to students listed on it, and all the talk pages for individual articles have been tagged as being part of an educational course to make it easy for other editors to identify them. The students only started the course on the 20th January and the second editing class was a week later (the 27th), hence they had not got far with their editing when you made your additions to Bromfield. The assignments are due on the 27th April. We try to encourage the students to interact with other Wikipedians through their article talk pages, so you are welcome to make suggestions to them on how they might improve their articles if they are working on one you are interested in. Paula (assisting with teaching this course) Paula vob 18:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Musgrave MP
added links pointing to Carlisle, Estate, Berwick and Scots

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Matthew Spark, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matthew Spark

[edit]

Hello, Terry Carrick. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Matthew Spark".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Patrick Ferguson Millard) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Patrick Ferguson Millard, Terry Carrick!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good new article, any photos that you know of that are in the public domain?

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Terry Carrick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raymond Higgs (artist) (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Terry Carrick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Raymond Higgs (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raymond Higgs (artist)

[edit]

Hello, Terry Carrick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raymond Higgs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]