User talk:TrippingHippy

TrippingHippy, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi TrippingHippy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your edits

Could you discuss your reversions of Hamish Miller (dowser) and The Sun and the Serpent on the appropriate Talk pages? Your inclusion of text in articles such as "a life of greedy capitalism", "groovy" and "funky dude" could be construed as disruptive to the encyclopedia. Your edits are also being discussed at Fringe Theories Noticeboard here. Thanks - 14:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hey man, I think you need to take a chill pill and mellow out a bit. Some of us think greedy capitalism is bogus and being groovy, funky dudes is right on. What's to discuss? I ain't gonna disrupt nothing, and bum out your religion. That's called religious hatred man, which is really not-cool and the reason the world's such a mess right now. Peace out. :) TrippingHippy (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (Thread is located here)- LuckyLouie (talk) 17:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

• My articles on Hamish Miller (dowser) and the St. Michael and Mary ley lines are gone and when I go to edit them it says that I have been blocked for being abusive. I have not been abusive and have no intention of being. Please can someone do the groovy thing and lift these restrictions and/or restore my articles. I spent all of the last weekend working hard on this project and was hoping to continue doing so. ۞TrippingHippy۞^talk 14:49, 16:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TrippingHippy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

Your request does not address the reason for the block: someone with Checkuser authority determined after a review of technical and behavioral evidence that you were likely a sock of a previously blocked or banned user. Without knowing which one, I can't determine if you were a sock of them or not. Maybe you can tell me who they think you might be a sock of? — Daniel Case (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, I am writing to request the unblocking of my user account which became inactiveyesterday. Over the weekend, I wrote two articles on Hamish Miller (dowser) and the St. Michael and Mary ley lines , which are also are gone and when I go to edit them it says that I have been blocked for being abusive. I have not been abusive and have no intention of being.Please can you let me know how to lift this block and/or restore my articles. I spent all of the last weekend working hard on this project and would like to continue doing so. I feel that I could help with the project constructively, as I hope my articles will show, on a subject lacking coverage. Also, is there any way to retrieve the articles? ۞TrippingHippy۞^talk 14:49, 16:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TrippingHippy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know man, I am not a sock of a previously blocked or banned user. I don't know who I am suspected of being. Perhaps they just suspect me of being a hippy? My real name is STRIKE. My e-mail is [email protected]. I have been trying to sort this out all day an have e-mailed a nice lady called Emma Dean at your head office who advised me to do this or go through the "Unblock Ticket Request System". Do I need to do that? Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to resolve this. Thanks buddy. ۞TrippingHippy۞^talk 14:49, 19:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per confirmation of soc puppetry by Checkuser. If you wish to further contest this block, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. --auburnpilot talk 05:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have stricken the user's name and email, so that spam bots don't pick it up, and to avoid any issues of the user unintentionally outing themselves Gaijin42 (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom unblock appeal

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock.

For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 18:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)