User talk:Uglytriangle999

Welcome!

Hi Uglytriangle999! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 10:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical accuracy

The New Age movement started in 1970. Neither Besant nor Blavatsky are considered New Age. Please do not introduce historical inaccuracies into our navigation templates. Also, before adding a new section on a nav template, you should discuss it and get consensus on the talk page first. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to articles

Please note that all additions to articles require citations to reliable sources. Please also note that all additions of categories must be supported by cited text in the article. You cannot just add categories based on your own beliefs and perceptions. You must prove via citation that the category is supported by scholarship. Skyerise (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing templates

Please do not change templates without first proposing changes on the talk page and getting consensus on the talk page. This is a collaborative project: you cannot just make whatever changes you want: if an editor objects (I have done so), then you must show there is a consensus for your changes on the talk page. Skyerise (talk) 23:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For further information, see our bold, revert, discuss cycle. You were bold: you were reverted - after that you have to propose your change on the talk page and gain consensus from the majority of editors responding that your changes are desired. Skyerise (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Savitri Devi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nordic race

A tag has been placed on Category:Nordic race indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mediterranean race

A tag has been placed on Category:Mediterranean race indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alpine race

A tag has been placed on Category:Alpine race indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jewish conservatives

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish conservatives indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish libertarians has been nominated for deletion

Category:Jewish libertarians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish classical liberals has been nominated for deletion

Category:Jewish classical liberals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Constitutionalism has been nominated for merging

Category:Constitutionalism has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Critics of socialism has been nominated for merging

Category:Critics of socialism has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Slavs by political orientation has been nominated for deletion

Category:Slavs by political orientation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:English people by political orientation, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispanic and Latino American socialists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Hispanic and Latino American socialists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 20:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hispanic and Latino American people by political orientation

A tag has been placed on Category:Hispanic and Latino American people by political orientation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop adding unsourced material, including categories, etc about Libertarianism to articles with no reliable sources mentioning Libertarianism

@Skyerise: I hope you are still watching this editor. Doug Weller talk 12:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry, just sort of thought it would be related. Uglytriangle999 (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article text must mention the categorization with citation before templates or categories can be added. Skyerise (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constitutionalism in England

Template:Constitutionalism in England has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Historical race concepts sidebar

Template:Historical race concepts sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rsk6400 (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm BlueboyLINY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tab Hunter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jacqueline Gold, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 02:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The west has fallen, billions must die

Hello, Uglytriangle999

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The west has fallen, billions must die, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § The west has fallen, billions must die.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ^SMason_Garrison 03:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. Uglytriangle999 (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish radicals has been nominated for deletion

Category:Scottish radicals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English radicals has been nominated for merging

Category:English radicals has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't recreate deleted categories like Category:Classical liberals ^SMason_Garrison 03:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Places formerly in Essex

A tag has been placed on Category:Places formerly in Essex indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 03:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Critics of capitalism

A tag has been placed on Category:Critics of capitalism indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 03:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Places formerly in Ross-shire

A tag has been placed on Category:Places formerly in Ross-shire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 03:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]