User talk:V8rik

24.215.95.182 (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 2005: Archive 2005
Archive 2006: Archive 2006
Archive 2007: Archive 2007
Archive 2008: Archive 2008
Archive 2009: Archive 2009
Archive 2010: Archive 2010
Archive 2011: Archive 2011
Archive 2012: Archive 2012
Archive 2014: Archive 2014

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allyl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grignard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kinugasa reaction.png missing atom in reactant

The terminal alkyne in the first structure ends with just an explicit "C". Should it should have an explicit H (as a neutral organic reactant prior to reaction with CuI), or else a Cu bonded to it (the 3+2 reaction is of the copper acetylide)? DMacks (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a change. Does not look pretty but it is effective. The peer-review time for images apparently is 9 years but I do not carry around the raw files for that length of time V8rik (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good enough, thanks. I rarely save mine either. DMacks (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Organozinc compound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reaction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phagraphene, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kcal and Mol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NiOOH

This note is about a set of articles that you created. They are being reorganized because I am fairly sure that all oxidized nickel oxides are really NiOOH, including nickel peroxide. I am not 100% certain, but the inorganic aspects are very specialized. The important thing which we need to flesh out is that somehow these things are related to batteries. In any case content was not lost. I hope you are going to continue to edit around here, BTW. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smokefoot, your edits make sense to me, keep up the good work! V8rik (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pyramidal carbocation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MILS series

Please look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Ions in Life Sciences and comment if you wish. Petergans (talk) 20:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uvitic acid

Hi there!

I have noticed your interest in the chemistry-related articles. I have recently created Uvitic acid, and need both professional and peer reviews as I am not than proficient with the subject of chemistry.

Cheerz! Lamro (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, V8rik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correlation diagram listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Correlation diagram. Since you had some involvement with the Correlation diagram redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DMacks (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ann. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ann.. Since you had some involvement with the Ann. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 02:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 31 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Pentazole page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced reference in Perovkite solar cells

Hi. I have replaced the Collavini reference for a more recent, interesting and accurate secondary source reference from Kamat.

I have seen that you included Collavini reference for first time and I would like to know that my change is ok for you.

ps: It was my first edition in Wikipedia. I will continue reviewing this entry about Perovskite solar cells. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perovskitor (talk • contribs) 08:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Perovskitor, I would see no reason to remove the first citation and replace it with another. Add all the citations you think are relevant but add them to the existing ones V8rik (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi V8rik,

I roughly estimate around 200 reviews in perovskite solar cell topic published currently in traditional scientific journals. Some of them dealing with more specific issues, another ones (majority) covering general aspects. I was wondering why specifically such 2-pages review was opening the wikipedia article on perovskite solar cells. It is not wrong of course, but it is lightly outdated and cover a very specific issue on perovskite solar cells as the (no) excitonic nature of this light harvester. In my opinion, there is 199 better review references to introduce perovskite solar cells to general audience or scientists looking for information about it. I personally have chosen the Kamat's review because probably it was the last one that I read and summarizes well the current trends of the topic in 56 pages.

However, you are right. Who am I to remove references here? I decided to put back the reference in a more useful place related to the specific issue that they are covering in the review. Perovskitor (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your consideration! V8rik (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in this

[1] Notifying you, since you've made a lot of edits to the article. Banedon (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hydrophosphination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsaturated. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical diagram mistake

On File:Fenestranes.png, the middle diagram is missing a second H on each corner. DMacks (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

grrrrr, a replacement is in the making... V8rik (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed V8rik (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (belatedly...forgot to watchlist this)! DMacks (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help Requests

@V8rik: Hi!
Attention is drawn to bond-dissociation_energy as once you had posted there. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist|4

Hi. Just letting you know that reflist|2/3/4 are all deprecated per Template:Reflist#Columns. If you don't know the best ways to format these are:

reflist|35em for 2 columns
reflist|30em for 3 columns
reflist|40em for 4 columns

Most of the time, 4 columns don't really need to be used unless an article has well over 200 or so refs. thanks --Jennica✿ / ^talk 10:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

got it! V8rik (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-Quinuclidinone hydrochloride.svg

Hi... I think you originally uploaded the File:3-Quinuclidinone hydrochloride.svg. In the synthesis, there is a formula for what I think is meant to be potassium ethoxide, and if it is, it is missing a hydrogen atom (ie. KOCH
₂CH
₂ instead of KOCH
₂CH
₃). Are you willing and able to upload a corrected version? Thanks. EdChem (talk) 08:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done! V8rik (talk) 10:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

propene - HBr reaction not balanced

In the reaction shown in MarkovnikovRulePropeneHBr.svg, there should be 2 propene and 2 HBr molecules to balance the equation.

Good catch! A replacement is underway. V8rik (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the Saponification diagram

Hi there. I saw the "Saponification" diagram svg file that you did, and I was wondering if it is possible for a remake of this diagram by replacing the English word "Heat" with the more universal symbol for it, Δ...it would save a lot on translation compatibility for other language Wikis that might use this diagram.

Sincerely,

Anumengelamun (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just made the change that you suggested. I hope it's ok for V8rik. --Hbf878 (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi, thanks for making the change! V8rik (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Chemistry Star
		Thank you for all the high quality contributions that you have made to Wikipedia's chemistry articles! ChemNerd (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! Means a lot to me. Have a great weekend! V8rik (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, V8rik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fullerenes in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fullerenes in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fullerenes in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 00:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Molecular spacer

The article Molecular spacer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find evidence that this is a real term of significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^{T go beyond} 14:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CramruleOfAsymmetricInduction.png

@V8rik: Hi!
I just wanted to point out that on the Asymmetric Induction scheme, the Fischer projections 2a and 2b show the wrong enantiomers. Please flip the positions of "H" and "Ph" in all streogenic centers. Thanks!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, V8rik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PentaceneSynthesis.png

You are invited to join the discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PentaceneSynthesis.png. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Iron, pentacarbonyl-" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iron, pentacarbonyl-. Since you had some involvement with the Iron, pentacarbonyl- redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vitamin B12 total synthesis: MAJOR revision

Dear v8rik,

at long last I was able to finish my revision of your Vitamin B12 article - I just uploaded it. The long delay is due to the fact that I found it necessary to re-read most publications (and a lot of ETH theses) in order to provide precise citations for verification.

Given the length and complexity of this article, my "unusual" application of Show/Hide, and the number of sources and citations, I deemed it essential to comment on this in the talk page.

Best regards, Bert Easyloc (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bert,

Extensive amount of work done! Congratulations! I am going to review the new work, I will leave comments not here but on the vitamin talkpage => Talk

Rik

Image discussion

commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:TwistedAcene.png is one of your images. DMacks (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Fractional charge" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fractional charge. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 3#Fractional charge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ComplexRational (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chemical chirality in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chemical chirality in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical chirality in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Molecular ion" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Molecular ion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 22#Molecular ion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EliminationReactionGlycerol2Acrolein2.svg

What does it mean in the image: "OS I:15"? Д.Ильин

ITN recognition for Robert H. Grubbs

On 21 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Robert H. Grubbs, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Neopentyl" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Neopentyl and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27#Neopentyl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Aprotic solvent" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aprotic solvent and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6#Aprotic solvent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CrafterNova (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Monomer(s)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monomer(s) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Monomer(s) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Silane, (4-aminobutyl)diethoxymethyl-" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Silane, (4-aminobutyl)diethoxymethyl- and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 27 § Silane, (4-aminobutyl)diethoxymethyl- until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dichloromethylphenylsilane" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dichloromethylphenylsilane and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 27 § Dichloromethylphenylsilane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Deoxofluorinating agent" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Deoxofluorinating agent has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26 § Deoxofluorinating agent until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski and McCombie method" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski and McCombie method has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26 § Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski and McCombie method until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyanimide

The article Cyanimide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find a consistent attestation to this term, which seems to vary in meaning across the literature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyanimide for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyanimide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyanimide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Clinistrip" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Clinistrip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Clinistrip until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chirotechnology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chirotechnology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirotechnology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Methanol economy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Methanol economy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methanol economy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Tri-tert-butoxyaluminum hydride" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tri-tert-butoxyaluminum hydride has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 17 § Tri-tert-butoxyaluminum hydride until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]