User talk:Vishwanath2008

July 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Battle of Alaboi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sumanuil. 19:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Battle of Alaboi. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sumanuil. 06:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assamese cuisine

Please do not keep removing cited material. Beef as taboo is a recent phenomenon. Please look at https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26671533 for a general discussion of the topic. Others such as D N Jha and Wendy Doniger have also written about beef eating. So you cannot make general claims on beef-eating and Hinduism. Brahmins of Kerala do continue to eat beef. Specific to Assam, not all inhabitants of Assam are/were followers of Ekasarana and even among these there are many sects within it that followed non-orthodox rites. And there are many, like the Ahoms, that ate beef. Do not remove cited material, which is WP:DE. Chaipau (talk) 10:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodox or unorthodox, beef is a taboo. The islamic rulers like tipu sultan enforced the slaughter of many hindus and forced them to eat beef, which over the course became a illegitimate habit. I being a Ahom myself never ever saw any ahom consuming it, also in no text is written that consuming beef is ok, it's has direct association with the god. I may come to this later Vishwanath2008 (talk) 02:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use Guha in Assamese cuisine. Guha mentions that liquor, pork and beef became taboo. But we know that pork and liquor are widely used. So how can you use this source to claim that beef is taboo now? Obviously this is not a reliable source for this claim. Chaipau (talk) 04:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pork and alcohol are taboo or seen as degraded items in the Vaisnava tradition. However this taboo is not strictly adhered as the taboo of beef. Vishwanath2008 (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not mix up the current revivalism elements, with this. I may not say this is in wikipedia, but this is very offensive for me as an, and also it may also led to misundersation among the non-readers. Vishwanath2008 (talk) 14:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Burhagohain

Please do not project Sanskritised names/titles to times before they were regularly used. Chaipau (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but does it make any difference , as the sanskritised names are the more frequently used. Vishwanath2008 (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra Singha image

Please do not revert the Rudra Singha image. The current one is a better depiction of the king. It is in color and closer to the original. A historical picture cannot be used as a portrait, since it was not meant to be. There is no guarantee of likeness. Chaipau (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image that you have provided is of very poor quality, and the faces are not even clear. Also It is not relevant to show some other thing, in which is just ment for the picture of that person. Look at the other pages. Vishwanath2008 (talk) 04:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom kingdom

Please provide specifics of punishment, citing sources. Please do not use judgmental tones. It makes no sense to be judgmental of past practices since most punishments in the past were very harsh, irrespective of region. Chaipau (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Vishwanath2008 (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here I am going off from wikipedia, all the edits were made under good faith. If I find more objective to return to wikipedia then I will appeal properly}} below. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

@Chaipau

Mir Jumla casualties- 20k infantry, 8k cavalry. Source:A history of Mugha Northeast frontier policy .pg-355

Mir jumla original strenght- 12k cavalry, 30k infantry, 323 war boats -source:history of Mughal Northeast frontier policy .pg-323

Officers- source: history of Mughal Northeast frontier policy .pg-324 Vishwanath2008 (talk) 03:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Itakhuli

@Chaipau

history of Mughal Northeast frontier policy .pg-384

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambika (Bor Raja) (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LordVoldemort728 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Last sentence "Sarbeswari was earlier married to Borpatrogohain of Kalugoan. Ambika had a son through Siva Singha, who was made the Tipam Raja or usually the heir-apparent. Of her sons from her former husband, one was made the Borgohain and the other Sadiya-Khowa-Gohain." is fully unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ambika (Bor Raja) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 09:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vishwanath2008! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 09:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ambika (Bor Raja)

Hello, Vishwanath2008. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ambika (Bor Raja), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ambika (Bor Raja)

Hello, Vishwanath2008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ambika".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]