User talk:Xowets

Welcome!

Hello, Xowets, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Prince (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to StarCraft II. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. What you are adding amounts to original research that is not compliant with our neutral point of view policy, as no media sources are reporting the information you are adding as a "controversy". First-hand information from fans is not valid for any content on Wikipedia, let alone information such as this; nor is Wikipedia a valid source to use in its own articles. -- Sabre (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of best-selling video games. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 19:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Nukem Forever

Just following up on some of your statements on the talk page for DNF; I thought it was better to bring it up here than there.

You seem to have a personal investment in this game. Apart from your recent statement about Jon St. John somehow being different to other voice actors in the game industry, you've previously made statements about the game such as "Who cares about other companies and it's release date standards , this is DNF, respect or gtfo", "that's not valid source but still , DNF is uniqe" and "Who cares about what other companies standards are , Duke nukem defines the gaming." In short, you seem to feel that for some reason, the DNF wikipedia article shouldn't be held to the standards of other articles; why is this? Aawood (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not like any other game , which eventually got canceled because they aren't as special and as subjective as this game is , they don't say much , and because of a lawsuit they don't say nothing at all at this moment, only scott miller makes a short words from time to time, since the initial false announcements by media sites that 3DR "is" closed down , many people don't care anymore and some of the important stuff is not as popular as it might otherwise be , see this video where Jace Hall the guy that first ever made DNF gameplay discoverd , made an interview later , in which he explains how subjective the game is , and how important it is to them (link: , it will probably never be canceled , because if it is , than that means end of the career for those guys , retirement or some low job , and you don't want to end your life like that at 40yrs , if you

There is no other developer that would be doing what they are , I don't live for DNF , butb I think it just earns some respect as a project , as a blessing almost , it's not your normal game desinger , who makes games like conveyor belt everything pre-designed and turns out to be a piece of garbage, I realize i must not write subjective article , but i think some things need to be mentioned but they aren't just because they seem too subjective in real life , but then we know objective ways to express a mention , maybe add somthing like Rumor section or something , or Last Hopes , because we all know they confirmed it in December 2009 , it was a clear and official from scott miller , but the major public think 3DR is already done for and we don't need to rely on major public and those wired articles.

Why did I said that , because 1997 was long ago , and not a lot of people don't know what 3Drealms actually was , they made the gaming , and they actually were the first publisher to ID , the only 2 companies along with Westwood , the TRIO that actually CREATED the gaming market , everything else you see now are capitalized copycats with a few exceptions(ofcourse there are a lot of talented private developers as well) and because they are big companies they do things on their own "standards" to make more profit , and why all other companies follow suit for these "standards" because a lot of them is also business centered and it is perfectly logical that they will see the idea for more profit too and thus follow or did it similarly.

And this article is a about a very anticipated game , it's not some conspiracy goverment secret thing to be so strict about it. Xowets (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, have you gotten the DNF footage on youtube yet? or any other videosharing site? Please reply on my page. Thanks in advance. --Mutlee (talk) 14:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion _(talk) 17:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respawn Entertainment

This article was re-directed as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Respawn Entertainment.

If you wish to create a new article, please do so in user space at User:Xowets/Respawn Entertainment then ask the closing admin Black Kite to see if he is happy for you to move it. If you have any questions please ask me.Codf1977 (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Infinity Ward worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. --ANowlin: talk 20:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nano-thermite and 9/11

You are formally reminded of editing restrictions imposed as a result of ArbCom actions relating to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/September 11 conspiracy theories. Continued disruptive editing such as your recent edits at Talk:Nano-thermite will result in sanctions in accordance with these restrictions. Acroterion _(talk) 01:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DNF engine AGAIN

You have again entered the DNF engine information based on unreliable from sources without contributing to gaining a consensus on the talk page: HERE. Please do so, I will explain the problems with every source and I invite you to defend your contributions. Rehevkor ✉ 20:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide accurate matireal

Please on the DNF page we can't accept forum posts you know its written right in the guidelines so please no more fan made content okay?254Jackson (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Wii U rumors

Please don't present rumors as fact, as you did here. The source you provided clearly calls this a rumor, where as you put it in the technical section without clarification on that. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:IDepicness.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IDepicness.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IDepicness.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IDepicness.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IDepicness.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IDepicness.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. DMacks (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Reggie Fils-Aime. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Otterathome (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The information is WP:TRUE is it? Doesn't work here like that. Also, it seems to have been 3 years since your first warning, yet you are still violating the same policies.--Otterathome (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse it's 3 years old i didn't do anything in between because i don't want to waste my time. Wikipedia is losing factual relevancy real fast Xowets (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WiiU Console Controller Black.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WiiU Console Controller Black.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WiiU Console Controller Black White.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WiiU Console Controller Black White.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings

hi I saw your comment on Hasting and I agree. I don't know why I'm writing here. I don't even have a car and defiantly do not understand technical issues. but I did notice that wiki completely ignored the car explosion, so I added a part called death- explosion. At least people will see this on the Talk page, if they don't remove it. --Jane955 (talk) 12:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alex Wagner because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 00:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Gamaliel. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Media Matters for America, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Warren Buffett, you may be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I wish everything that wikipedia holds on controversial topics were true. Especially financial parasites which get all the bailout and taxpayer money while they can't run their own life. Xowets (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Coast to Coast AM, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Auric talk 21:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battlefield Hardline. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —LucasThoms 17:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xowets. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xowets. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]