User talk:Youngjtdyt

Welcome!

Hi Youngjtdyt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome! I will be sure to visit those links.

Youngjtdyt (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gary Harris, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, links are generally not repeated per MOS:REPEATLINK. —Bagumba (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bagumba, Thank you for bringing that to my attention. I will do my best to ensure that I don’t repeat that mistake!

Youngjtdyt (talk) 03:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Dave Simmons (basketball, born 1963). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You unnecessarily repeated a team link again. —Bagumba (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of going through and fixing the unnecessary hyperlinks. I would appreciate patience from you, Sabbatino and whomever else I have frustrated. Didn’t mean to be disruptive. Thank you, see you around.

Youngjtdyt (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freddie McSwain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Freddie McSwain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 23:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I went to write it and it became an article right away so I was a little confused. First time taking a crack at it so I appreciate the help!

Youngjtdyt (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie McSwain Jr. (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

1st paragraph needs inline citations per WP:BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 08:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Youngjtdyt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eyebeller 08:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie McSwain Jr. (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 13:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie McSwain Jr. (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Freddie McSwain Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 16:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball articles

I just saw you helped with a lot of articles in the basketball world the past week, including a few that I worked on as well. Keep up the good work, and thanks! Ausbasketvic (talk) 04:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking forward to you covering Australian basketball a bit more! We have plenty of young players making a name for themselves in the NBL and Big V. Ausbasketvic (talk) 04:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ausbasketvic: Thank you, it’s not a particular focus of mine at the moment but I will contribute where I can. Welcome to Wikipedia Youngjtdyt (talk) 04:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NWHL and hockey notability guidelines

Saw your comment at Draft:Jordan Brickner about raising a discussion about expending notability guidelines for WikiProject Ice Hockey. While you’re more than welcome to do so, the Women's Ice Hockey task force raised the same discussion fairly recently and were met by pretty fierce opposition from a small but quite vocal group of WP:NHL members. For our part, WP:WHOCKEY opted to distance ourselves from the hockey notability guidelines and have adopted WP:GNG as our principal guidance. None of which is to say that you ought not raise the issue again, only to forewarn that it is a bit of a landmine. Best wishes however you choose to go forward and please feel welcome to connect with the Women's Ice Hockey task force if you are interested in pursuing further contributions to women's hockey coverage on Wikipedia! – Spitzmauskc (talk) 08:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spitzmauskc: I appreciate you informing me of the previous attempts and also including me in potential plans for the future. I’ll definitely go check that out! All the best Youngjtdyt (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for beating me to the punch Spitzmauskc! Yeah, Youngjtdyt, you'd be fighting an uphill battle with trying to change the notability guidelines. What I have tried to do on some of NHCLS other drafts is to try to apply the guidelines for college atheletes, or playing for the national team in the IIHF world championships. I personally held off on accepting the Brickner article because I didn't see her meeting those two guidelines. I think Spitzmauskc makes a good point about GNG, but sometimes that can be harder to find and reviewers still may look toward the HOCKEY guidelines. Best of luck in reviewing! We need all the help we can get! Bkissin (talk) 16:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bkissin: Haha well it is good you are also being so vigilant, can’t have too many helpful eyes. I’ll consider what you’ve shared and see if I can find a way to help. Thanks for getting in touch, good luck to you too! Youngjtdyt (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Freddie McSwain Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freddie McSwain Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddie McSwain Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Inspiralens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Youngjtdyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet. I have been around far longer than the account associated with this investigation and never had any such issue. I was not paid for editing, nor have I ever been. The pages I have authored or contributed to significantly Transfer portal Freddie McSwain Jr. Trace Cureton Stefan Iulius Gavril get a lot of my focus and I try and stay active with them, but that doesn’t mean I was paid to do so. I have written to the best of my ability, and honestly. If cleanup for any of my work is requested, I am happy to comply. Please review my contribution history and see that this block is unwarranted, as I do not damage or disrupt the encyclopedia. Thank you. Youngjtdyt (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. Also funny you mention about (not) being paid, yet you are blocked for sockpuppetry. MER-C 15:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Transfer Portal, Freddie McSwain Jr., Trace Cureton, Stefan Iulius Gavril. Wanted to fix the error from above. Thanks Youngjtdyt (talk) 07:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your relationship to Youngjtdyt2020 (talk · contribs)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I do not have a relationship. Youngjtdyt (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, come on. Do you seriously expect us to believe that? MER-C 15:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply to|MER-C}} I do expect that, and to be treated in good faith. Being blocked for sockpuppetry doesn’t mean I am a sockpuppet. What would it take to clear my name? Checkuser? Not editing the pages I have significantly contributed to (listed above) without informing you? Youngjtdyt (talk) 01:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: Apologies for the template issue, please let me know. Youngjtdyt (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did it not occur to you that the person who blocked you, who is the same person who asked that question, is a checkuser who almost certainly performed a check before blocking you? MER-C 12:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: Your attempt at condescension isn’t appreciated. I am trying to resolve this and have offered solutions to do so. It did occur to me, and I’m positive there wasn’t a Checkuser connect to any other account or IP address. Because I’m not a sockpuppet. He blocked me because he suspected me of being one. Youngjtdyt (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trace Cureton (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bagumba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, not enough significant coverage from independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trace Cureton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trace Cureton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Bagumba (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

FYI, please see the edit summary here. [1] --2603:7000:2143:8500:746F:5787:2314:6A0D (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]