Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Rinderer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Rinderer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found for any notability, even in a Lichtensteiner newspaper she gets one passing mention only[1], other Google hits[2] are also statistics and passing mentions only. Fram (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Football, and Europe. Fram (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON (she is 16 years old) and while Tagblatt in Switzerland notes that she scored 2 goals for Triesen in the Women's 2nd League, and the GettyImages photo of her U-19 UEFA throw-in playing for the LI national team is ace, there isn't any coverage of her to date beyond passing mentions and stats to justify an article per WP:BASIC. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with User:Cielquiparle's assessment of it being WP:TOOSOON and the significant coverage just is not there. Her age and stats lead me to believe she is an up-and-comer, so her notability could change rather quickly. For this reason I am also open to moving to draft space as an WP:ATD, though the content and page history are so minimal, it may be better to start from scratch when/if she reaches the GNG threshold. Frank Anchor 18:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is little to no evidence of Wikipedia notability here. This is an easy delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.