Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parid Bërdufi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parid Bërdufi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Given that we now need to focus on WP:GNG, I can't see a good reason for keeping this article. During my WP:BEFORE search, I noted that Google News and ProQuest had no hits at all and DDG only contains Wikipedia mirrors, which are useless. Google search yields database websites like Soccerway, Playmaker Stats and Football Database which are far from meeting the requirements of GNG and WP:NBASIC. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.