Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted West

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn based on fulfillment of WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) InvadingInvader (talk) 03:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ted West

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely relies on a source, notability not adequately demonstrated. Unable to find SIGCOV from RS's. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and England. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources already in article which show notability. Professional football with over 200 appearances. Did the nominator even read he article before nominating?! GiantSnowman 18:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Did the nominator even read [t]he article before nominating?! – Most of the sources were added after the AFD started. See what it looked like when first nominated. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  OK, let me re-phrase - did the nominator even try and find sources before nominating?! Giant Snowman 20:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - non-trivial sourced info added about subject's early life, playing style, post-playing career which constitutes significant coverage from more than one source Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per everything above. Clearly was significant figure in English Lowe league football, with over 100 fully pro appearances. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes GNG after recent expansion.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.