Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 11

< February 10	February 12 >

February 11[edit]

RremundOCUTOUT.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RremundOCUTOUT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RremundO (notify | contribs).

orpahned image, unencyclopedic personal drawing Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portrait.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Colprep (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo, likely used on a deleted article Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Osamaelkadi2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osamaelkadi2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Elkadio (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader. A reference to the subject was added by the uploader to Lists of Egyptians under the businessmen section but is currently a red-link -- unsure if an article was written and deleted or never written. There is also a potential of a WP:COI issue given the uploader's name and the subject's name. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Prem.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prem6630 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kharma45reading20074.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kharma45reading20074.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bartholomew14 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uplaoder, likely used on a deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kharma45colourreading2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kharma45colourreading2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bartholomew14 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uplaoder, likely used on a deleted article on the band Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PHreciente.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PHreciente.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chokolate (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, redunant to File:PHrecientebiggerf.JPG which appears to be the pre-cropped version which is in use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

12_19_2005.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:12_19_2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greendaypunk74 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic photo of a store front Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Raymond_Chow.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raymond_Chow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greendaypunk74 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedice prsonal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tony_The_Boy_2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tony_The_Boy_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grimesceneuk (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole remaining edit by user, was likely used in speedy deleted article, Tony The Boy Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bone Thugs-n-Harmony Uni-5.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bone Thugs-n-Harmony Uni-5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by K starks (notify | contribs).

replaceable fair-use image of a band - (fails NFCC#1). As far as I can see they are still together after a reunion and so a free image could be created Peripitus (Talk) 02:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LGO.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OmegaWikipedia (notify | contribs).

UK CD 2 cover that is just a crop of the UK CD cover 1 image already used in the article. Can be replaced by a short piece of (free) descriptive text telling the reader's about the differences and so fails WP:NFCC#1. As basically identical to one of the existing images in the article with no significant justification it is also excessive use (fails WP:NFCC#3a). The rationale is incorrect boilerplate that falsly claims t is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article and as having an incorrect rationale it also fails WP:NFCC#10a Peripitus (Talk) 03:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

JoJo - Leave (Get Out) - German CD maxi single.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoJo - Leave (Get Out) - German CD maxi single.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).

European CD single and CD maxi single cover cover that is just a basically recolouring of the UK CD cover 1 image already used in the article. Can be replaced by a short piece of (free) descriptive text telling the reader's about the differences and so fails WP:NFCC#1. As basically identical to one of the existing images in the article with no significant justification it is also excessive use (fails WP:NFCC#3a). The rationale is incorrect boilerplate that falsly claims t is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article and as having an incorrect rationale it also fails WP:NFCC#10a Peripitus (Talk) 03:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HSMCD2-Disc.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HSMCD2-Disc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QuasyBoy (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover that is basically, except for the background, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dblorig.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dblorig.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fantailfan (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover that is basically, except for a colour change and the text, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Saboteurs-BrokenBoySoldiers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saboteurs-BrokenBoySoldiers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kyleglanville (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover that is basically, except for the title text, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

AnghellicReparations.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnghellicReparations.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kevin82485 (notify | contribs).

re-release cover that is basically identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The Rod Stewart Album (US).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Rod Stewart Album (US).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sampm (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover that is so simple it can be described with a short piece of (free) text and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

From Janet to Damita Jo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:From Janet to Damita Jo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover that is basically, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

If I Had One Chance SE cover.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:If I Had One Chance SE cover.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jesussaves (notify | contribs).

Special edition cover that is basically, except for the faded look, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dididog2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dididog2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keiron22 (notify | contribs).

Special edition cover that is basically, except for the background colour and some text, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Digieur.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digieur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Keiron22 (notify | contribs).

Special edition cover that is basically, except for the background colour and some text, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hoobastank-everymanLE.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hoobastank-everymanLE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JBZA2003 (notify | contribs).

Limited edition cover that is basically, except for the colour, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Janet Jackson - 20 YO album cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet Jackson - 20 YO album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).

Deluxe edition cover that is basically, except for the colour, identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. Can be replaced with a small piece of (free) text describing the simple differences and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 03:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ann Wagner US Ambassador Luxembourg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann Wagner US Ambassador Luxembourg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ross UK (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by commons:File:Ann Wagner.jpg Jay32183 (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2796737374 013abd339a b.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2796737374 013abd339a b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shinewood (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, bad file name, replaced by File:Overall Beijing Finance Street.jpg. JaGa^talk 08:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison setup 18-55.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Still orphaned. -Nv8200p talk 02:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison setup 18-55.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilder Kaiser (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. This was uploaded just over one month ago and looks like it is going to be part of an article on photography of some sort, similar to the uploader's image used in Chromatic aberration. Disk is cheap, so I don't see any harm in leaving this alone for the time being. Crypticfirefly (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison setup 16-85.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Still orphaned. -Nv8200p talk 02:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison setup 16-85.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilder Kaiser (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. This was uploaded just over one month ago and looks like it is going to be part of an article on photography of some sort, similar to the uploader's image used in Chromatic aberration. Disk is cheap, so I don't see any harm in leaving this alone for the time being. Crypticfirefly (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison close-up 16-85.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Still orphaned. -Nv8200p talk 02:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison close-up 16-85.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilder Kaiser (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. This was uploaded just over one month ago and looks like it is going to be part of an article on photography of some sort, similar to the uploader's image used in Chromatic aberration. Disk is cheap, so I don't see any harm in leaving this alone for the time being. Crypticfirefly (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison close-up 18-55.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Still orphaned. -Nv8200p talk 02:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikkor 18-55 16-85 comparison close-up 18-55.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilder Kaiser (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 08:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. This was uploaded just over one month ago and looks like it is going to be part of an article on photography of some sort, similar to the uploader's image used in Chromatic aberration. Disk is cheap, so I don't see any harm in leaving this alone for the time being. Crypticfirefly (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Heat pump COP.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heat pump COP.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaboldy (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 08:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Decorator_Pattern_ZP.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 02:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decorator_Pattern_ZP.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by XcepticZP (notify | contribs).

Picture is wrong. (see [[1]] Phresnel (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure exactly what is wrong about the picture. Are the labels just wrong? Could it simply be fixed? Since this is an SVG, anyone can modify it. Perhaps you should, instead of requesting deletion of this file, go to Wikipedia:Graphic Lab post this image and say "Label X needs to be changed to Label Y" and list all the things you want done to the image, and someone there can help fix the image. Or am I mistaken and this image is not fixable?-Andrew c ^[talk] 01:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tigerspirit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tigerspirit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Liamdunaway (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, little encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wipikedia.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wipikedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aeleweijn (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, non-notable band, no encyclopedic value. And what's up with the file name? JaGa^talk 09:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Larrytessari.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larrytessari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Baddawgg (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Amino acid.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amino acid.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wolfmankurd (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 09:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Amino acid1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amino acid1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wolfmankurd (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 09:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Foxes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foxes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vervester (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. Found at Orphaned images in Category:Self-published work. JaGa^talk 09:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Darkprincedanmain1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darkprincedanmain1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Screamteam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Redclownmain.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redclownmain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Screamteam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value - but User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me might like it. JaGa^talk 09:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Aa2k6ue 4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aa2k6ue 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alienrace (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Loveletter for Korean Dears CoverArt.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loveletter for Korean Dears CoverArt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oncamera (notify | contribs).

Additional non free image used to illustrate a korean release in an article with an almost identical non-free already used The small differences (colour only) can easily be described with (free) text and as such this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mike Oldfield Shade cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Oldfield Shade cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TubularWorld (notify | contribs).

Additional non free image used to illustrate an article with an almost identical non-free already used The small differences (colour) can easily be described with (free) text and as such this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the image may be similar, but it is not just different in colour, the photo contained within is different. TubularWorld (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Though very very similar. All he's doing is looking a couple of degrees closer to camera - Peripitus (Talk) 11:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fall heads roll u.s..jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fall heads roll u.s..jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HMSOleano (notify | contribs).

Additional non free image used to illustrate the American issue in an article with an almost identical non-free already used The small differences (text moved around a bit) can easily be described with (free) text and as such this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Their Law (Limited Edition) Cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Their Law (Limited Edition) Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by T4nn3r (notify | contribs).

Additional non free image used to illustrate a limited edition cover in an article with an almost identical non-free already used The small differences (leather texture added to background and badge colour changed) can easily be described with (free) text and as such this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 09:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Records chartsuk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Records chartsuk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The reverend (notify | contribs).

Additional non free image used to illustrate a UK release in an article with an almost identical non-free already used The small differences (text moved slightly and background colour changed) can easily be described with (free) text and as such this image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 09:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WP Kinsella photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WP Kinsella photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ed Fitzgerald (notify | contribs).

Very nice non-free image of a still living subject. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 and the notes on unacceptable use in WP:NFC as a free alternate could be taken Peripitus (Talk) 11:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vernettalopez.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The image is clearly replaceable, as a person could take a picture of Ms. Lopez and release it under a free license. Marcuslim's arguments show a misunderstanding of the non-free content policy, in that the only encyclopedic purpose served by the photograph is identifying the article subject, which a free photograph would do just as well. There is no provision stating that a non-free photograph can be used until a free one is found or created, and indeed were there such a revision, the non-free content policy may as well be torn up. Stifle (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vernettalopez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marcuslim (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of a living person. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as a free alternate could be taken Peripitus (Talk) 11:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All alternative selections of images of the person, search-able on Google or any other search engine, are subjected to similar copyrights that is invested on the current image. So between the choices, current choice of image found on article Vernetta Lopez presents the person in discussion, in a neutral, non-suggestive light and suitable for the overall article presentation. -- Marcuslim (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the section NFC - unacceptable use point 12. It is possible to take a free image or contact her/publicity agent to get one. The intent here is that hosting a copyright image discourages people from getting a free one...and getting a free one is possible if difficult - Peripitus (Talk) 02:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While i agree a free image is indeed possible from sources suggested by Peripitus, any images available on the internet and in this case, taken from a newspaper source, and attached with relevant copyright information, provides sufficient coverage to serve the current purpose for the article. NFC - unacceptable use point 12's clause that states that provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. As such I certainly welcome obtaining a free image by Peripitus' efforts, either through some other sources or that from Vernetta's agent. Until one such image is available, the current image should be retained for use. -- Marcuslim (talk) 04:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Giotto.mourning.750pix.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giotto.mourning.750pix.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arpingstone (notify | contribs).

Deprecated. Replaced by high-res version at Commons Papa November (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

AnthonyWayne.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnthonyWayne.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs).

No information given about authorship or first publication date Papa November (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Palaisint2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palaisint2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DavidLevinson (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, source link dead, too small to be of much use on Commons Papa November (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

StateQuarterNH.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:StateQuarterNH.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Minesweeper (notify | contribs).

Low resolution, orphaned, bad PNG transparency artefacts. Replaceable by File:New Hampshire quarter, reverse side, 2000.jpg at Commons Papa November (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Steven Chu ChangeGov Press.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steven Chu ChangeGov Press.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hekerui (notify | contribs).

Orphan, superseded by better picture Hekerui (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Flag of Ireland rugby.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Ireland rugby.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cvene64 (notify | contribs).

As per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(icons)#Inventing_new_icons and WP:OR and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Wider_opinion_needed. This is an invention which wiki does not allow Gnevin (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.