Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 22

< March 21	March 23 >

March 22

File:Photo 10.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Very Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fastily. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EftelingMermaid.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Improper ND license applied. MBisanz ^talk 03:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The non-derivative clause in its release makes it incompatible with free works, and not acceptable here. Not used in any articles. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Academy of science moldova.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no freedom of panorama http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#Former_Soviet_Union IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and File:Academy of Science Moldova.JPG (note capitalization difference). No FOP for this sort of work in Moldova. One could therefore claim fair use, but the depiction of the building in which this academy is housed is not crucial to the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ent Crewman 2nd class.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned, very low res, unencyclopedic because of that, copyrighted anyway (note the ST logo on the right). --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GNN Mosh bb2 00000002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A scene from a musicvideo of Eminem is not free enough, even though it was available for free over at the soure site. There's a difference in being free meaning you don't have to pay for it and free in the way the Wikimedia projects mean it, i.e. being reusable for everything. The Evil IP address (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's blatantly not free, and we could re-tag as non-free screenshot or something, but the image isn't mentioned in the article, which makes it fail WP:NFCC #8. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2009 fundraiser parody banner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pointless image, UE. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hilarious image, and Wikipedia needs to let some fun into their site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.227.92.23 (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wales Parody Donation Banner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointless, UE, orphaned. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hilarious image, and Wikipedia needs to let some fun into their site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.227.92.23 (talk) 20:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR, unencyclopedic.--Jimbo W junior (talk) 01:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BoxCutterBlade.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Cropped form File:BoxCutter.jpg. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary image. Orphaned. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fleischer Superman image.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a copyvio, but orphaned and low quality. Part of a discussion almost three years ago, and not needed. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Express Group logo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can be removed from National Express Group without affecting the article. Cloudbound (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The current logo of the company looks nothing like this, and is free. We don't need the non-free image, which isn't in use by the company, to make sure people understand they've reached the right article. Redundant, unneeded, fails WP:NFCC #8 and #3a. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.