Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 May 26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 26[edit]
File:Wolfpack 014.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete for lack of indentification. The uploader was asked about this file, but failed to respond. I should note that the uploader has been active since notification of this file, as well as the question. — ξxplicit 06:37, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wolfpack 014.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jojhutton (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, may have EV, useful in illustrating camouflage and marine life. Captain Whitehall (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Any idea what type of species this is? — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Elakala Waterfalls Swirling Pool Mossy Rocks.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Elakala Waterfalls Swirling Pool Mossy Rocks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by The High Fin Sperm Whale (notify | contribs | uploads).
- I forgot that was not on Commons and added a Category. The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Italy 2007 039.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Italy 2007 039.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chiefmanzzz (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, foreseeable use in articles about Italian railway stations. Captain Whitehall (talk) 10:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Manhattan Cocktail.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Manhattan Cocktail.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hayford Peirce (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A (superior) derivative work of File:Manhattan Cocktail2.jpg. — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hartland vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hartland vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Guilford vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Guilford vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Vernon vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Vernon vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Shaftsbury vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shaftsbury vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Greensboro vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Greensboro vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Killington vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Killington vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Larger, higher quality image already in use. Captain Whitehall (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:TexasCapitolInterior.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TexasCapitolInterior.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, quite a useful picture of a specific location. Move to Commons, since it's orphaned here. Nyttend (talk) 05:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a much better image of the same subject exists and is already in Texas capitol.Captain Whitehall (talk) 10:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Surface marker buoy.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Surface marker buoy.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mark.murphy (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Target article is Surface marker buoy, forms part of a sequence, of the buoy stowed, furled and inflated. Transwiki to Commons Commons:Category:Surface marker buoys.KTo288 (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Inspiration top.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Inspiration top.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mark.murphy (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Waterbury vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waterbury vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Uss panay.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uss panay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Perl (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, very Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons reasonable alternate image of the ship. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USMC Force Recon emblem.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USMC Force Recon emblem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joseph Dwayne (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, very Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Mt.bromo-crater.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mt.bromo-crater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ravn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:JP Morgan Chase Tower Dalla.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JP Morgan Chase Tower Dalla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RadicalBender (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hyde park vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hyde park vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Michiganterritory1834.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Michiganterritory1834.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jengod (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Useful historical map; send this to Commons to be sure. Might be useful at Michigan Territory, among other places. Nyttend (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:FigueresTower.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FigueresTower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Copied to Commons. Photo shows church tower of Sant Pere de Figueres from different angle than other photos on Commons. Local en:W copy may be deleted as redundant. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Chi ling5.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chi ling5.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Patrick0Moran (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Trenchcoat.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Trenchcoat.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Neither of the photos in the Trenchcoat article are in color. PleaseStand (talk) 11:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:MeadChapel.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MeadChapel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Adamfranco (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:SLwhistlemap.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SLwhistlemap.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Uni redlands.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uni redlands.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mark in the wiki (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Gallium2 640x480.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gallium2 640x480.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Foobar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Keep if someone can de-orphan it. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Huh? What do you mean low quality??? 76.66.193.224 (talk) 07:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons qualifies. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 07:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons - clearly good enough to warrant move. Hekerui (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Glue4 800x600.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Glue4 800x600.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Foobar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Addison vt highlight sm.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Addison vt highlight sm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redjar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Peachblossom9202.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Peachblossom9202.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Umainelawn1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Umainelawn1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jalnet2 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Umaine1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Umaine1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jalnet2 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Hunan-map-en.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hunan-map-en.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Cncs wikipedia (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons license is compatible, and it uses a multicolored fill to illustrate the breakdown of Hunan, like many US maps do for the states. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Galvan.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Galvan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Xorx77 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Mancala generic.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mancala generic.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by PilotPrecise (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep'. Useful for Mancala. — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Star thistle4708.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Star thistle4708.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic/blurry, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Milkweed3660.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Milkweed3660.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic/cloudy, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Traffic300x200.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Traffic300x200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Akadruid (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo medecine bow mountains.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo medecine bow mountains.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:RotatedSpacetime curvature.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RotatedSpacetime curvature.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ancheta Wis (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fingerthimble.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fingerthimble.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JubeJube (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic/blurry, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Second Lieutenant insignia.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Second Lieutenant insignia.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RadicalBender (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, superseded by svg version. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:HiroshimaPrefecturalPromotionHall.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HiroshimaPrefecturalPromotionHall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Xamian (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Cardboard.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cardboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zachbe (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ricin process.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ricin process.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by The Epopt (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:RoyceFace.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RoyceFace.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chris Harris (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Alohatower-sm.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alohatower-sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by KeithH (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:NewZealandElectorates1996.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NewZealandElectorates1996.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Vardion (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Centuryegg1.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Centuryegg1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kowloonese (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Century egg, anyone? — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Centuryegg3.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Centuryegg3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kowloonese (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Century egg, anyone? — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo big sandy river wyoming.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo big sandy river wyoming.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo little colorado river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo little colorado river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo roaring fork river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo roaring fork river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo san rafael river utah.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo san rafael river utah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo uncompahgre river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo uncompahgre river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo white river utah.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo white river utah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Uterus and vagina with captions.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uterus and vagina with captions.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Fabiform (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Completely fine, and can be transwikied to commons really easily. Secretlondon (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:View from National Cycle Network route 47.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:View from National Cycle Network route 47.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Granw (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I( cannot see any reason to keep this. I have deleted the redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:View from National Cycle Network route 47 between Nelson and Hengoed in South Wales.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:View from National Cycle Network route 47 between Nelson and Hengoed in South Wales.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Granw (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:UNC-ThePit-1.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:UNC-ThePit-1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Seth Ilys (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo big hole river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo big hole river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo madison river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo madison river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo clarks fork of the yellowstone river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo clarks fork of the yellowstone river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:AuthorsCar.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AuthorsCar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RivGuySC (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lampropeltis getula californiae.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lampropeltis getula californiae.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by ArinArin (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:RiverThames.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RiverThames.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Secretlondon (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ancient photo taken when we didn't have better. Transwiki to commons? Secretlondon (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ntl undgrnd rr frdm ctr.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ntl undgrnd rr frdm ctr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rdikeman (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Logskidder7981.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Logskidder7981.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Venice Beach.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Venice Beach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Morn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:J. C. Watts.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:J. C. Watts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jiang (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, very Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete orphaned crop of File:Watts and Powell.jpeg. Hekerui (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo bad river south dakota.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo bad river south dakota.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo big sioux river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo big sioux river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo cache la poudre river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo cache la poudre river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo kansas river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo kansas river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo little missouri river north dakota.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo little missouri river north dakota.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo north platte river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo north platte river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo smoky hill river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo smoky hill river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo south platte river.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo south platte river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wpdms nasa topo white river south dakota.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wpdms nasa topo white river south dakota.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful for showing the topography of the areas through which the river flows. Move to Commons, since it's not being used here. Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Turkish-provinces.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Turkish-provinces.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by EnginGunduz (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:22GordianI.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:22GordianI.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Perl (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, very Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:BushLupin.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BushLupin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Seglea (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, nothing wrong with this image. Send it to Commons. Nyttend (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Redfacedmalkoha05.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Redfacedmalkoha05.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Airforce bowling chief martin.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Airforce bowling chief martin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zanimum (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality/blurry, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Airforce blur crosscountry.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Airforce blur crosscountry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zanimum (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USAF.insignia.o2.collar.wag.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USAF.insignia.o2.collar.wag.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wguynes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, superseded by svg version. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lake-geneva.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lake-geneva.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MichaelJanich (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Geneva1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Geneva1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MichaelJanich (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Geneva2.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Geneva2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MichaelJanich (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USAirF.insignia.e3.sra.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USAirF.insignia.e3.sra.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, very Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Edinburgh castle.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Edinburgh castle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Taras (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:USAr.insignia.e4spec.wag.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:USAr.insignia.e4spec.wag.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wguynes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, superseded by svg version. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sun-symbol.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sun-symbol.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Samuella (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 04:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Commons license is compatible, and this is an astronomical symbol. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Support denmarkSmalAnim.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Support denmarkSmalAnim.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by TruthCrusader (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Italy 2007 039.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Italy 2007 039.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chiefmanzzz (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Not required please delete Chiefmanzzz (talk) 12:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Game banner.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Game banner.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Oxguy3 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- This image has been created to cause people to 'lose the game' using the Wikipedia advert banner - {{Template:Wikipedia ads|1|213}}. This is not an appropriate use of the advert banner system, which is there to promote WikiProjects and the like. The Game article is already the target of enough idiotic vandalism without this banner directing more people to it (which is what happens when you click the banner). MickMacNee (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I didn't really think of this banner as obnoxious when I created it; I didn't think it would be taken seriously. Oxguy3[dubious – discuss] 05:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, obvious violation of the purpose of the advert system and has already been removed from ad rotation. --Zarel (talk⋅c) 23:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete rm non-educational nonsense. Hekerui (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because if it isn't okay for this image to be in the Wikipedia Ads template, I don't see any use for it. -- Oxguy3[dubious – discuss] 18:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The image has a compatible license and is being used on an active editor's User page. It doesn't appear to be violating any relevant policies or guidelines I'm aware of. The image itself doesn't appear to be disruptive or condone/incite vandalism on the related article. Whether or not this image should be used with Template:Wikipedia ads should be discussed on that page's talk page.--Rockfang (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Stop-supremes-1965.ogg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stop-supremes-1965.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by B Touch (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Adds nothing to reader's understanding. Tried to FFD on the 20th but Twinkle must have puked. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I think this sample does add to reader's understanding. Dawnseeker2000 00:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because this shows the user the sound of the chorus and other parts of the song more than the article text does. -- Oxguy3[dubious – discuss] 18:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of critical commentary, fails WP:NFCC#8. — ξxplicit 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:WikiComp.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WikiComp.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Number Googol (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unencyclopedic; no use. Number Googol (talk) (my edits) 19:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bustamantejoseluis.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bustamantejoseluis.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dynamax (notify | contribs | uploads).
- no evidence the photographer is dead for 70 years (José Bustamante y Rivero himself died 1989) Hekerui (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's unlikely that the photographer has been 70 years dead, because this was probably taken during Bustamante's term in office, which began less than 70 years ago. -- Oxguy3[dubious – discuss] 18:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Quintard mall.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Quintard mall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Queenfan13 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- No source or author credits. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – it does not appear to be the complete text-logo but rather a poor quality rendering of only the bottom portion. PleaseStand (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.