Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 18

< July 17	July 19 >

July 18[edit]

File:Snakeplain SF1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible screenshot of freeware game by U.S. Army. Should be in Commons because it is in PD. Some software editors can modify due to free software Kungfu2187 (talk) 11:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as non-free. (I don't know that this is the right forum for discussing this since you're not really asking for the file to be deleted, but here goes anyway.) The source website - http://www.americasarmy.com/ - has a copyright notice. Works of the federal government are public domain, but if this game was the work of contractors or even of an LLC that is wholly owned by the government, it is copyrightable. Since the source website has a copyright notice and a link for licensing requests, I think we have to take that as prima facie evidence that it is copyrighted, barring something really really really solid to the contrary. --B (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is in fact non-free, if my reading is correct. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elias Rudolph Camerarius, Jr. (1673-1734).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source given is not the primary source, therefore there's no authorship information, and it was used in an article which was just deleted as a 100% copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eugenebruce.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. None of the book this is from, it's author, and the subject of the image have Wikipedia articles. Combining that with the image's poor quality, I see no encyclopedic use for this image. Additionally, copyright is iffy (was it created in 1919, or published in 1919? Certainly, the current GFDL tag can't be accurate). –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GO BIG RED.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image is clearly non-free (per the summary text) and in that case is not justified per the NFCC, it's superfluous. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Faithful reproductions of non-copyrightable material (In this case a 2D sign with a logo) cannot attain copyright. Other concepts that apply are de minimus. If there are stil people who disagree, crop the sign out of the photo and use only that portion.Buffs (talk) 05:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debivort dilliff stitching error temp.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary file from a very old FPC. Will never be used in an article. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, as the creator. kill it. de Bivort 21:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grampians Panorama from Pinnacle - Nov 2008 edit small.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary file from a very old FPC. Will never be used in an article. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1000px-Grampians Panorama from Pinnacle - Nov 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary file from a very old FPC. Will never be used in an article. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graph of Zapak Popularity.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free screenshot. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sample expression btbd12.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this is, it is only used in two sandboxes not edited since 2009, and the source information really isn't telling me anything. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mib19145i Btbd12 E14.5.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this is, it is only used in a sandboxe not edited since 2009, and the source of own work seems dubious. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mib 19415i Brain ventral Btbd12 Adult.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this is, it is only used in two sandboxes not edited since 2009, and the source of own work seems dubious. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Small-Red-Card.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Red card.svg, unused except for at a template itself at deletion as unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Small-Yellow-Card.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:Yellow card.svg, unused except for at a template itself at deletion as unused. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SpiritExpress.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Might be PD for lack of originality, but is certainly not GFDL, which it is marked as. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Labelled flaccid penis.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, per G7 ƒox 19:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's junk. We have enough of these. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this a long time back, but am not the owner of the item in question. There was a debate about why the infobox image in Penis at the time was in black and white (File:Labelled bw flaccid penis.jpg) and File:Labelled flaccid penis.png is a colour version of the same image. Since it is not being used in any articles, it can be deleted.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 04:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WAAY-AM 1550 logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete last two, No Consensus on the first two. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:35, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The rationales of these logos list the purpose as identification, but the article is identified by the current logo, which is used in the infobox; so the use fails WP:NFCC#3a. Also the use does not significantly increase reader understanding as required by WP:NFCC#8. —teb728 t c 23:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all as the images further reader understanding of the station's shifting branding and formats over the several decades covered in the article. Simple identification is not the only purpose of these images. - Dravecky (talk) 23:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all no discussion of logo change (and highly doubt that sources discussing this exist). format change can be understood through text just fine. currently the article is just a senseless mishmash of nonfree images. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I completely disagree that these are all non-free images (see below), though I concede they certainly are incorrectly labeled as non-free...this is likely due to problems in our upload process which do not provide all the necessary options to properly label an image like this from the get-go. Buffs (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep some The two oldest have clearly fallen into the public domain due to a lack of a displayed copyright (pre-1989). I'm hesitant to say that the last two meet the threshold of originality, but I'm not exactly sure. I'd like to hear the thoughts of others. Buffs (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pupopsbanner.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic use, image description page sends mixed messages about the license B (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:98px-Wappen Poschiavo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scaled down version of File:Poschiavo wappen.svg. (I have replaced all instances with the SVG) --B (talk) 23:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.