Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 6

< July 5	July 7 >

July 6

File:Maidenhead bridgecropforDYK.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Apparently was intended for DYK use, but it isn't even linked to from any of the DYK prep pages, much less transcluded. Redundant to the uncropped File:Maidenhead bridge.jpg. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GWATM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scan of an ATM card from Great Western Bank. I don't see how this ATM card adds to the user's understanding of the article - it's not even mentioned in the text. B (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We already have a logo for the bank. If this is supposed to be here to give a better idea of the bank's branding and self-presentation, in my view it adds very little; not enough to justify a second non-free image. Jheald (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SPBATM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to the above, ATM card used under a claim of fair use in Security Pacific Bank. I don't see how it adds to the user's understanding of the topic. B (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above. We have to draw a line, otherwise articles would end up looking like a christmas tree of non-free images. It's not that the image is so objectionable, nor that in itself it is such a great copyright taking; but it really adds very little. Jheald (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thandie.jpg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded for deleted article Thandie B (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sunintrees2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, random photo of an unidentified tree. Photo has a date stamp in the corner so it's unlikely to be used. B (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Conceivably might have been useful for a thematic stock photo, which I think is one thing that Commons is sort-of there for, because it is quite an attractive shot; but, as B says, spoilt by the date stamp. Jheald (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sunintrees.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, random photo of an unidentified tree. Photo has a date stamp in the corner so it's unlikely to be used. B (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Less attractive shot, equally spoilt. Jheald (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Light bulb patent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality—The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns. (often abbreviated LQ) President Lethe (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image is on commons, discussion on en.wp is mis-placed. I transferred rationale and completed the nom at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Light bulb patent.jpg to host the actual discussion. DMacks (talk) 19:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UTC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:University of Tennessee at Chattanooga athletics logo.png, which is of lossless format, while this one is not. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Author Lauren Groff May 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Text says "Photograph taken by Clay Kallman." name of uploader is Wthomashawkins (does not seem to be the same name). The file is unused. MGA73 (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clay Kallman is apparently the husband of the depicted author, Lauren Groff [1]; they apparently live in the town where this bookcircle happens. I'd guess uploader may be in the photo, and it may have been taken by Kallman on the uploader's camera (?), which might be construed as handing him an implied licence to control it and make it available as he wished. It's not a bad photo (somebody always has their eyes shut when I take groups like this), but it's hard to see a use for it here. Interestingly, Cbkallman (talk · contribs) does have a user-id here, and has uploaded a rather more usable picture of his wife; so he could be contacted, if anybody wanted to save this pic and upload it to a commons cat on her. Jheald (talk) 17:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ramazan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Bad description. Perhaps it is Ramazan Ramazanov. MGA73 (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Just me.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image lacks description and therefore I see no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Fleet Command (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Just me.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No foreseeable encyclopedic use. Possibly a test upload. Fleet Command (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jrb002.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo without a description and no educational or informational worth. The supplied vague description suggests that this is a test upload... or maybe to use Wikipedia a photo sharing website. Fleet Command (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jrb002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo without a description and no educational or informational worth. The supplied vague description suggests that this is a test upload... or maybe to use Wikipedia a photo sharing website. Fleet Command (talk) 19:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture73.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned profile photo, is user's only contribution, inactive for years. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned user photo. Uploader has three edits, inactive since 2006. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture81.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality partial image of a book cover. Orphaned and probably not free. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture98764321 004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, orphaned, non-free file, apparently of Phat. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.