Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 25

< June 24	June 26 >

June 25

File:Baraka scanned at 8k.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination from a result of a {{Di-replaceable fair use}} tag. See [1]. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What? Did anyone read my comment on the image page? Jon (talk) 06:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC) Repeated below since it has been deleted from the image page:[reply]

If you seriously think you can find another free image of a Fotokem 8K digital film scanner in action, go right ahead and delete this image. The 65mm negative of Baraka was scanned at 8K for the specific purpose of digital preservation, reproduction of new 70mm prints for exhibition and for the Blu-ray release. Scanning anything at 8K is almost never done, and the machine used to do it was built specifically for the purpose of scanning the Baraka 65mm negative, as there are very few film scanners that can scan at 8K in the world. Since this was a notable event in the history of digital cinema, a picture of any old digital film scanner will not suffice. Also, there are no such images of 8K film scanners that I can find, outside of the footage in the Baraka documentary. But as I say, if you can find a picture of an 8K scanner in the process of scanning a negative, that is free to use, do replace this image with that one. Jon (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seeing this image is not critical to the reader's understanding of the topic. --B (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFC#8. Image does not need to be included for the reader to understand the context. The prose explains just fine how the scanner was used scan the original film negatives for the Blu-ray release. Also fails WP:NFC#1. If an editor does feel that picture of a film scanner is necessary for the article, a free image of another scanner can be used in its place. The article does not need to have an image of the exact same scanner that was used for this film. For example, the article 2005 Logan Airport runway incursion, which involves a plane crash, has two pictures of planes that are similar to the ones that were involved in the incident. There is no need to include non-free images of the exact planes that were involved. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Airwalk Dillon Moc Slippers.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now PROD'd article, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paris Theater From Flickr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

poorly retouched version, obsoleted by File:Paris_Theater,_New_York.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comment immediately below from the uploader has been moved from User talk:Magog the Ogre:

Hi,

I saw your message related to my picture being up for deletion. If you check the first one I uploaded you'll see it's of inferior quality. Also, I don't understand what you mean by "obsolete". The theater is still there and at the same location, unless you mean something else please reply and let me have some further explanations, thank you in advance.

Archiveeditor (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it for deletion, but I did it in good faith thinking the image was no longer needed; however, if you disagree, we can certainly discuss it. First off, the image you uploaded is poorly cropped; it has a white border on the right/bottom sides. Secondly, it doesn't seem to me that it's of any better quality than the second image I mentioned above: File:Paris_Theater,_New_York.jpg . By obsoleted, I meant that we have another copy of the image which seems better to me, not that we don't want the image at all anymore. If you disagree, feel free to let us know below and we can discuss it further and try to come to a reasonable consensus to make everyone happy. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:19thFormationPatch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lossy image; deprecated by File:19thFormationPatch.svg, which is lossless. Not eligible for F8 because it is a different file format. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaley Cuoco in 2006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No source beyond the one technically included in the copyright tag ("I, the author of this work..."). Due to the nature and quality of the image, I'm inclined to think it is copied from somewhere. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kosta Koufos Season Ticket Holder Event.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; can't determine who is pictured due to poor description; poor quality. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kurp In 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No source beyond the one technically included in the copyright tag ("I, the author of this work..."). Due to the nature and quality of the image, I'm inclined to think it is copied from somewhere. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mitch Gaspard.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No source beyond the one technically included in the copyright tag ("I, the author of this work..."). Due to the nature and poor quality/low resolution of the image, I'm inclined to think it is copied from somewhere. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nodiscc icon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No source beyond the one technically included in the copyright tag ("I, the author of this work..."). Due to the nature of the image, I'm inclined to think it is copied from somewhere. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GUITAR.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, presumably copyright logo. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not qualify for WP:CSD#F10. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 12:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Graduation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A licensing mess. Image has been replaced and reuploaded-over multiple times, but license tag hasn't changed the whole time, so the only image we have actual licensing for is the first uploaded image, and I find the licensing of the first version suspicious because it doesn't have a real source and the image isn't very high resolution. Delete AND SALT. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:46, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Countieshf.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:OR the term dual county is entirely undefined Gnevin (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GAA logo-test4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Gaelic Games Project logo Gnevin (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.