Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 14

< November 13	November 15 >

November 14[edit]

File:Ananthabhadram Kavya.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as its omission would not be detrimental to understanding of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I am not entirely mistaken, "detrimental to understanding" is understood in consideration of "significantly increasing readers' understanding". This was used along File:Raja Ravi Varma, In Contemplation.jpg, a painting by Raja Ravi Varma to illustrate the close resemblance of the painting in the film frame. Since Ravi Varma resemblance is a major component of the film and its aesthetics amply covered by sources, it may be considered that visual resemblance can only be understood by using images, static, moving or interactive. Thank you. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 11:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 03:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are going to use the Raja Ravi Verma original for the purpose of making readers significantly understand the subject. We use plenty such free images in film related articles where we want to show that a certain scene was inspired from such a such original art work. We do not necessarily have to present the both images to drive that point in. For example Kahaani uses a free File:Pratima Visarjan by Gaganendranath Tagore.png but does not provide a screenshot of the film as evidence. We also see various free images of shoot locations being used in film articles, like say in Once Upon ay Time in Mumbai Dobaara!, Mother India and more; but do not add screenshots as evidence to prove resemblance or such. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Then I guess you need to remove and delete the image. Okay then. I hope the discussion can close now. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 04:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jamie xx - In Colour.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to PD-simple Majora (talk) 04:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be simple color, but I'm discussing it just in case. Note this is an English work, so it is original enough to be kept here, but should it be PD or FUR? © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 06:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image seems simple enough to fall below the threshold of originality. Suggest changing the licensing to "PD-simple". Salavat (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spaceace-arcadescreenshot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically in an article with several pieces of non-free media —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Space Ace snes.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically in an article with several pieces of non-free media —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abbe May with a shell necklace in Bali black and white.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low res, possible copyvio, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nomad Foods Europe logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo with no accompanying article. Cloudbound (talk) 21:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.