Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 18

< February 17	February 19 >

February 18

File:Dhallë Lufra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

derivative of non-free content (packaging) FASTILY 00:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claire Newell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unlikely own work. The first version of this file appears on multiple websites and is a crop of the second one. — Train2104 (t • c) 00:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citizens Committee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Citizens Committee.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also previous listing: w:en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 21#File:Citizens Committee.jpg czar 06:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mexican Federal Highway 136D.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete, see [1] for a complete set of shields that are in SVG and match the proper specifications. Rs chen 7754 02:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, especially per the inaccuracies in this graphic. Imzadi 1979 → 20:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Haridasa and prostitute.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Haridasa and prostitute.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keilany of Rob Kaufman.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 03:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BigLITTLE James Adagba.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work MCMLXXXIX 04:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sanjev Siganture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn –Davey2010^Talk 20:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this really should be on here ?, As the editor also has their surname on here I assume anyone could easily pass off as the editor themselves (unless he has a different signature and surname IRL which I don't believe is the case), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I'm not seeing anything in policy that prevents the user from keeping an image of their signature in their userspace. Mz7 (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I but as I wasn't sure if identify theft could happen and as they're an Indian user I wasn't sure if they were aware of Identity theft either, Ofcourse if there is no risk I'd happily withdraw however inshort I'd rather be safe than sorry. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

:@Davey2010: Number one I'm not indian I'm Sri Lankan, I do take issue with the fact that you seem to imply that "an indian user" would not know what identi"f"y theft is, I certainly am ignorant in what 'identify theft' but more than cognizant of "identity theft" (the correct way to spell it if you are still catching up). The image itself is merely the rendition of my name in cursive so it's unlikely it can be used in identity theft. That being said I think it is taking up unnecessary space so I vote Delete --Have a great day , Sanjev Rajaram (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A) Incase you hadn't fucking realised it was actually a typo!, B) Some editors here are clueless when it comes to this sort of thing hence this FFD, I apologise for labelling you as Indian probably should've done my research before filing this, Withdrawn. –Davey2010^Talk 20:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST TheMenagerie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. czar 06:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not used educationally but as decoration in the infobox. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Without this image, no one would understand why Spock would risk being courtmartialled in a Starfleet tribunal to "mask' the wounds of his disfigured former Captian--Captain Pike. This screenshot should probably be OK for this Star Trek episode because it is being used as the primary means of the identification of the now deformed Captain Pike. This image helps explain the context of Spock's actions in travelling to Talos IV--an action which is expressly prohibited by Starfleet--so its a bit more than purely decorative. Please remember that this Star Trek episode, "The Menagerie" won a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation. So, the presentation here of the episode and its main characters--especially Pike--would have been notable for the award win. Thank You. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NARANGI ANCHALIK MAHAVIDYALAYA.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of some sort of school logo. Even if uploader took the photo himself (note: instead, he has long history of claiming others' work as own), no evidence uploader owns the license (that would be the school) or that the object being photographed is in whatever is within FoP for wherever it is. DMacks (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CosaintLogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single news article about them, only mentions appear to be self-made. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mircea Baniciu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. See [2]. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tataee at B'Estfest 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. See [3]. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.