Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 April 20

< April 19	April 21 >

April 20

File:First Geodetic Survey Station NHS, QC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Without a date, we can't know if this has fallen into the public domain. The licensing tag is patently false (there are non-commerical restrictions on that site) and this editor uploaded numerous other images from this site that were all speedied. This one, due to the potential age isn't unambiguous so I'm bringing it here instead. Majora (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This and several other photos were nominated for deletion and, before any discussion or reply could take place, were removed from the page just 10 minutes after being nominated. If I read the timestamps correctly, they were then deleted from Wikipedia one minute after that. There was no time to reply, and the "Contest this deletion" button must have disappeared along with the files.

The site from which all images were taken has a clear provision for non-commercial use, stating that images "...may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the Government of Canada, or the provincial or territorial government counterparts." Important notices, Non-commercial use, Historicplaces.ca It asks that the name of the website be identified, which was done in the source entry. If there is any issue with the license selected, feel free to suggest one which might be a better fit. Yoho2001 (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from talk page --Majora (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-commercial restrictions are not acceptable here. --Majora (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a restriction on use. It's an explicit provision made so that such images CAN be shared without any problem. The statement on the website clearly encourages free use, without any further permission necessary. Yoho2001 (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, except under certain conditions: The website states as follows: "Reproduction of multiple copies of material on this site, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution is prohibited except with written permission. " That is a restriction placed upon commercial use, and Wikipedia cannot accept such a file under a free license because Wikipedia does not accept free licenses which place any restriction on commercial use. What essentially is needed is a license which would allow anyone to download the file, make as many reproductions of it as they want, and then subsequently sell as many of those reproductions at any price they want without needing anyone's permission. That is basically what the copyright holder is agreeing to in advance when they release their work under a free license suitable of Wikipedia. As I posted at User talk:Majora#Deletion of photos from "National Historic Sites in Quebec", "non-commercial restrictions" can be confusing when you use it with the words typically used to express negation such as "no" or "not". A website may state its content can be used freely for non-commercial purposes (i.e., no non-commercial restrictions), but also state that permission is required for commercial use (i.e., "restrictions on commercial use"). These are not the same and shouldn't be confused. AFAIK, there's no type of free license that Wikipedia will for such content; so, it has to be either clearly demonstrated that either (1) this file falls within the public domain per Canadian copyright law, or (2) the copyright holder explictly agrees to release their work under a free license that Wikipedia can accept. The former likely depends on how long ago the photo was taken and who took it, whereas the latter typically needs to be verified by Wikimedia OTRS. If neither of these things can be achieved, the file should be deleted. The only other possible option would be to convert the file to non-free content, but that type of use is highly restrictive per WP:NFCC and not sure if that's a viable option in this particular case. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cleffs O.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cleffs O2.JPG and this file are exactly except this file is missing 'Mezzo-Soprano' under one of the clefs. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clementi gradus ad parnassum 26 (c)simonetto.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. I think this file does meet WP:CSD#F10 as a useless non-media files but I am not absolutely sure whether this is a non-media file or a media file. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is a MIDI file, so it technically is a media file and therefore is just out of the CSD F10 targeting range. Doesn't mean we can't delete it here, because as has been said, it's useless. Richard ⁰⁶¹²

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cliffordsstuff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cliffs of Moher, Clare, 2015.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clint Coley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:25, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clipped volume of myself.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an encyclopedic article: a user's profile picture.

20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlastairRonaldo (talk • contribs)

@AlastairRonaldo: User profile images are not allowed, especially when they are orphaned. They would be deleted on Commons as 'out of scope' if they were uploaded there and there was no use. Wikipedia is no different to Commons. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User profile photos are allowed.06:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlastairRonaldo (talk • contribs)

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CLIP0002 0001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clivehowes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clubb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cmabdulkareem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cmd pssw.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.