Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 August 24

< August 23	August 25 >

August 24

File:Pink Floyd - Oh, by the Way back.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used critically--just fluff. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for what it's worth, I originally uploaded it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indo-Iranic languages.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted and kudos to @Rye-96: for the new image, which I have added to Indo-Iranian languages. --B (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete, self-picked list of languages, including name errors (Old Farsi and Middle Farsi), wrong information ("Pahlavi" is another name for Middle Persian, and the other "Pahlavi" is Parthian, which doesn't originate from Old Persian), illogical typography (italics and text sizes), and confusing order (Dardic and modern Dardic suddenly fly over Indo-Aryan, instead of declining under it). It can't be fixed by being partially edited.
—Rye-96 (talk) 11:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is too controversial to be designed by an editor based on supposedly sourced content. We should only put up charts that are directly sourced from WP:RS. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Admin note - noting that this image was uploaded prior to NadirAli's topic ban from uploading images. It appears to be an updated version of File:Indo-Iranic basic chart.jpg, which was uploaded 7 Feb 2016 by NadirAli and then deleted by self-request on 10 Feb. The current version was present on Indo-Iranian languages from 24 Feb 2016 until Ohnoitsjamie removed it on 7 Dec 2016, erroneously citing NadirAli's ban on image uploads. I don't have any comment on the content other than that it is not currently in use anywhere. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector:
Ohnoitsjamie also described it as original research, though.
—Rye-96 (talk) 14:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Complete WP:OR and would be rejected wherever it would be added. Excelse (talk) 13:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Irreparable and going to remain unused. Sdmarathe (talk) 05:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - orphaned with no obvious value. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded this as a replacement, btw.
It's a more general chart, and it's based on Ethnologue.
—Rye-96 (talk) 20:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The replacement is much better, thanks! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wentorf Jr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Though this image description page claims that the source is public domain because it is "free", that means "free" as in pizza, not "free" as in public domain. The book itself has a copyright notice and was published in 2001. It is a private organization - not a US government agency. The book is copyrighted and this photo should be deleted. This image is orphaned. There are two crops from this image - one of the signature and one of the headshot. I have tagged the headshot as fair use and tagged the signature as PD-signature. This image should be deleted as it is orphaned. B (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo for Geely Auto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Use this logo in lieu of the other one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails fair use; resolution is too high, plus File:Geely logo.png already exists. Home Lander (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Home Lander: Why is File:Geely logo.png the preferred logo? [1] has the File:Logo for Geely Auto.jpg version of the logo ("GEELY" text, no Chinese characters). So unless I'm missing something, we should be converting File:Logo for Geely Auto.jpg to PNG, scaling it to web resolution, and deleting File:Geely logo.png. --B (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
B, good enough; I see also the bot has already downsized the new image. Home Lander (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IVCCU.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful that the license is real. The uploader originally uploaded this image with the old "non-commercial use only" selector and then changed it to GFDL-self. They give a source, so the license is very unlikely. B (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Woman undergoing iris scanning.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful that the license is real. The uploader originally uploaded another image from the same location with the old "non-commercial use only" selector and then changed it to GFDL-self. They say "this is not a licensed image", so the license is very unlikely. B (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mixed-handed.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader said "I made it myself (as a combination between the right and left hand images on Wikipedia)" but gives no indication of what image that was. Whatever it was has been lost to time. I looked at the history of Hand and couldn't figure it out. So there's no evidence that the source image is public domain. 2006 was a time when there were still a lot of non-commercial use images on Wikipedia and so the source images may have been deleted. The image is used in User:Disavian/Userboxes/Mixed-handed, but could be replaced with File:Emoji u1f450 1f3fb.svg, I guess? B (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oldsportsdayweb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence (nor reason to believe) that this image is in the public domain B (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Te Rata detailed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source image - File:The Berryman Bridge.jpg - was deleted for lack of evidence of permission. The original uploader of File:The Berryman Bridge.jpg attributed the photo to "Margaret Berryman", but I'm assuming the original uploader is named Stan. B (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.