Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 16

< September 15	September 17 >

September 16

File:Filem Negara Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of tiger top, means this is not a simple text logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Special Affairs Department.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non trival, but claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Board of Engineers Malaysia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non-trival, and thus cannot be claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Actuarial Society of Malaysia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non-trival, and thus cannot be claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jalur Tiga.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non-trival, and thus cannot be claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angkatan Amanah Merdeka.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non-trival (torch element), and thus cannot be claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malaysia Crime Prevention Foundation.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is non-trival, and thus cannot be claimed as simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vaughan book cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Referral, as this clearly indicates this is a book cover, but is claimed as own work. The relationship of the uploader and book author, publisher isn't clear. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free book cover and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gond king of nagpur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: problem resolved - the attribution is now correct --B (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is taken by me, uploaded by someone else as their own. The photo is already released in CC-BY. Original is published on Google Photos. aintgd (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shivashree: I see that the photo was uploaded here in 2014 and its EXIF data says it is from "Picasa" (now Google photos). To clarify, are you saying that you do want to publish it here under the terms of the "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0" license? Could you please provide a link to where it was published prior to April 2014 showing where you use the CC-BY license? (I'm assuming that the photos are shared because if they weren't, someone couldn't have gotten into your private photos to upload one?) --B (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@B: - This photo was originally shared on Panoramio. Now Panoramio is closed and photo moved to Google photos. I'm trying to share a link here, but it seems goo dot gl links are blacklisted on Wikipedia

I have two photos of this taken and published in 2012. These can be found here.

Yes, I want to publish the original image here under CC-BY-SA 3.0 or any similar license.

Please see if this link works. https: //photos .app .goo .gl /QfPCQRA36Ucr9unRA

aintgd (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- @Shivashree: [1] says it was only uploaded there two days ago and doesn't give any license for it. What I understand you to be saying is that you took this photo, uploaded it to Google prior to 2014, and someone else copied it from your site and uploaded it here, that you agree to the CC-BY license but just want the attribution corrected? Is that correct? What I was hoping to see is something showing it uploaded 4+ years ago and showing the CC-BY license. But if that isn't available, and you're not actually asking to have the file deleted, I'd say just edit the image description page to show the correct attribution. I have looked at VrMUSLIM's uploads on Commons and it looks like they just take files from wherever and claim them as their own (e.g. File:InsideGharibNawazNagpur.jpg, File:Shrine of Abdul Qadir Jilani..jpg. So suffice it to say, I believe you even if you can't produce the original page. Just edit the image description page as desired. --B (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- - @B: Thanks.
  - I do not want the image deleted, but just to get it correct attribution. I thought I would let someone else do it rather than doing it myself. But as we have already discussed it here, I would Be Bold and correct the attribution myself. Thank you.

- - (Just for the record, this image was uploaded on Panoramio in 2012 as a part of my project on Statues of Nagpur. Later, Google (who owned Panoramio), shut the site down). aintgd (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Okay, I see you added yourself to the "Author" tag. I have corrected the {{self}} tag at the bottom to attribute it to you as well. Closing this FFD. --B (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Logos by Speedy2169

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete one file and relicense the others to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: I have merged all of these together. @Speedy2169: has a lot of allegedly self-created uploads here and at Commons and most of it needs to be cleaned up. A lot of his "self-created" jerseys have copyrightable logos on them and need to go away. He has logos that lack anything resembling a source. @Whpq: already tagged Speedy2169's photos and I have deleted them. But there's still some mess to clean up --B (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relicense File:Nelson Bay RLFC logo.jpg, File:Sunshine Heights Football Club logo.jpg, File:Salisbury North FC logo.jpg and File:Terrigal Avoca AFC logo.jpg to non-free logo and add a source. Delete File:Salisbury North FC guernsey.jpg as a non-free sports uniform that adds nothing to the article and has no critical commentary. Salavat (talk) 02:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosy Senanayake Mayor of colombo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is unlikely that the image rights belong to Rosy Senanayake. The image has been published in several government owned outlets:

This suggests to me that the photo was taken by a government photographer. Obi2canibe (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hamlin Fistula International (logo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FFD re-referral because although this is claimed as simple, a TOO concern may arise about the logo element (top). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Голос 60.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is not simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Голос logo (the Voice of Russia).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) as non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 24. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I'll Get There advertisement.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 24. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:I'll Get There advertisement.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YRC Worldwide logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TOO concern, logo elements (top). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YRC stands for Yellow Roadway Corp.. This logo consists of the letters 'y' and 'r' with gray shaped fillers to complete a rectangle. In my opinion, below TOO. --Ben Stone 17:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as pd-logo, looks simple enough to fall below TOO. Salavat (talk) 02:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gloria Jean, 1938.tif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 24. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloria Jean, 1938.tif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABGABOLJINNAH.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Saqib with the reason: "The uploader claim - own work . can't be true. The subject died in December 1972. Need permission via OTRS" FASTILY 20:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the other person in that image is Fatima Jinnah who died in 1967. It's technically possible that the uploader took that photo more than 50 years ago (and is now in his or her 70s?), but I think some healthy skepticism is warranted despite their claims. Huon (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Balochworld (talk · contribs) and Balochworlds (talk · contribs) both uploaded File:KBABGABOLJINNAH.jpg. Can you please check for me if this is same photo or different? --Saqib (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same image, and interestingly uploaded with the claim "Picture provided courtesy of Mir Nadir Khan Gabol" i.e. they didn't take it themselves. Delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: And I don't buy it either. Mir Nadir Khan Gabol is the great-grandson of the person in photograph. --Saqib (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: Balochworld claiming they took this image in or around 1966. Well, you need to see the date here. --Saqib (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless evidence of permission is provided via WP:OTRS. Was published on Facebook here before User:Balochworld uploaded it to Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 14:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabol Tribe Mens welcoming Sardar Nabil Ahmad Gabol.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Saqib with the reason: "image of a living person - also need permission . the uploader has a repu of uploading copvio." FASTILY 20:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabolqaboos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Saqib with the reason: "image of a living person - also need permission . the uploader has a repu of uploading copvio." FASTILY 20:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KBABGABOL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Saqib with the reason: "The uploader claim - own work . can't be true. The subject died in December 1972. Need permission via OTRS" FASTILY 20:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sahir Iqbal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 20:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Withbenazir2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Saqib with the reason: "image of a living person - also need permission . the uploader has a repu of uploading copvio." FASTILY 20:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star Wars opening crawl logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, redundant to File:Star Wars Yellow Logo.svg (or other logos in Commons:Category:Star Wars logos). If we need a Star Wars logo in a slightly different color, it should be SVG. B (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by Salem North Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear who the author is. It's a public domain image, but a Creative Commons license, the author is the uploader, or the author is Christopher Jon Luke Dowgin and it's used with permission. B (talk) 22:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1st Doctor's library card.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This image is non-free with little encyclopedic value, so I believe violates WP:NFCC#8. The file is used on one page (First Doctor), as a sort of fandom-y image (see this section of the the aforementioned article to see how it is used) Ted Edwards 22:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ibrahim Ashmawey photograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. The source website says "Published under Creative Commons 1.0", which doesn't specify a particular license and, in any event, looks like license washing. B (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I support deletion as the original uploader. Found it a long time ago and it doesn't seem to be used anywhere so it's not of any use. I would speedy it myself if there was an appropriate tag for that. Isingness (talk) 22:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Isingness: Deleted. I think {{db-g7}} is what you are looking for. ;) --B (talk) 00:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corridor exterior closeup FOCSA Building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes, it should be deleted. Thank you!ovA_165443 00:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.