Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28

File:MathisMvmt2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. Discussion should happen on Commons not here. c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:MathisMvmt2.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pontchartrain Beach Poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. "callas.net" is not the author of the poster, and I find no indication it is free licensed as claim. A quick online search shows it is copyrighted by artist Brad Thompson. [1]. Infrogmation (talk) 05:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Timessquaremetropolis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such shot in the film Superman Returns from which this image allegedly originates. There is no "Glenmorgen square" in the film either. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CadmusStamp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CadmusStamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star Wars - The Mandalorian release poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is already non-free media on this page: this image doesn't add enough value to pass WP:NFCC#8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Completely agree with nom. - Brojam (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is nothing beyond "The first official poster and trailer were released at the D23 Expo on August 23, 2019" about posters in the article. This statement does not necessitate seeing a picture. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wii Fit Trainer, ssb4.jpg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from Wii Fit. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not needed to understand that a Wii fit trainer appears in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in Wii Fit Trainer as the primary image of the character and remove from Wii Fit as an excessive non-free image to the article. Salavat (talk) 07:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in Wii Fit Trainer as the main infobox image there, especially with a changed fair use rationale to back it up, and Remove from Wii Fit as being unnecessary. Aspects (talk) 04:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.