Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 October 14

< October 13	October 15 >

October 14[edit]

File:Kathleen Lynn.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Rationale states that "subject is deceased, no free equivalent could reasonably be obtained or created". However, there are at least two other public-domain (copyright ineligible/expired) images of the subject in the article on the subject. We therefore don't need (and can't really make a fair-use claim for a need to have) this copyrighted image. Not any more at any rate. Guliolopez (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NFCC#1 ww2censor (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emblem of India 1947-1950.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused media file, because I have my file uploaded from Commons (see File:Emblem of India (without motto),svg). TaleofTalisman (talk) 11:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 23:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dangerousmoonlight-03.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot is used in the Cast section of Dangerous Moonlight. The fair use rationale states its purpose is "Illustration of key scene in film", which is not a valid fair use. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the actual caption: "In a key scene, Radetzky plays his composition, Warsaw Concerto for Carole Peters in the midst of a ruined city. The scene was reminiscent of actual events in Poland at the time." In the body of the article , under "Production" is the explanation for the use of the illustration: "Since music was such a key element in the film, Walbrook, who was an accomplished amateur pianist, is seen playing in the film, although the music on the soundtrack is played by the professional pianist Louis Kentner. Kentner's involvement was initially uncredited, as he thought that being seen to be playing film music would not help his career. He changed his mind on seeing the film's success." The note is also indexed by a reference source: ""Dangerous Moonlight". BBC website. Retrieved: 7 May 2012." With all this connected story element, the illustration should stand. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be critical commentary of the image itself in the article text. Without the image, there would be no caption, so that cannot be used to support the image and even what is here is not critical commentary of the image. The rest of the information that you copied from a different section that the image is not located in, talks about the music and not the image itself, so this is still not critical commentary of the image. You also do not explain how the image passes WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sourced critical commentary about what the scene looks like, just WP:OR. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.