Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 3

< April 2	April 4 >

April 3[edit]

File:Quebec national soccer team.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the time that this was uploaded, it was the main logo of the team. However, it's been superseded by File:New logo for Quebec national soccer team, introduced June 2015.jpg, and now appears in the article in a gallery, with no critical discussion about the old logo. I am therefore contesting that the image no longer meets the NFCC requirements. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Serapid LinkLift Patent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: File is likely copyrighted, convert to non-free. -FASTILY 03:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did close the previous discussion that converted this file to non-free, but the slightly modified and larger version on Commons of the same file was deleted then restored. So perhaps we don't need the local version anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (as non-free) I have nominated the Commons file for deletion. The Commons template states that only illustrations from before 1989 are PD, but this illustration is from 1999. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit socks rsl20h.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this or commons:File:Kit socks rsl20h.png the official version of the kit? Because if it's the enwiki copy, it needs to be uploaded to Commons and the local copy deleted. If it's the Commons version, the local copy needs to be deleted. If both are, the local version needs to be renamed. Pinging LL2005 too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit socks houston20a.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this or commons:File:Kit socks houston20a.png the official version of the kit? Because if it's the enwiki copy, it needs to be uploaded to Commons and the local copy deleted. If it's the Commons version, the local copy needs to be deleted. If both are, the local version needs to be renamed. Pinging LL2005 too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit right arm rsl20h.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this or commons:File:Kit right arm rsl20h.png the official version of the kit? Because if it's the enwiki copy, it needs to be uploaded to Commons and the local copy deleted. If it's the Commons version, the local copy needs to be deleted. If both are, the local version needs to be renamed. Pinging LL2005 too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit left arm rsl20h.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this or commons:File:Kit left arm rsl20h.png the official version of the kit? Because if it's the enwiki copy, it needs to be uploaded to Commons and the local copy deleted. If it's the Commons version, the local copy needs to be deleted. If both are, the local version needs to be renamed. Pinging LL2005 too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit left arm houston20a.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this or commons:File:Kit left arm houston20a.png the official version of the kit? Because if it's the enwiki copy, it needs to be uploaded to Commons and the local copy deleted. If it's the Commons version, the local copy needs to be deleted. If both are, the local version needs to be renamed. Pinging LL2005 too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dravida Munetra Kazhagam (rising sun).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the real logo, but a "generic image" made by the uploader. Not in scope of Commons, and unused on enwp. See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_21#File:DMK_Rising_Sun.png Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned and fake logo with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ShellyBirch.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly a publicity shot and has been used as such here. Given the uploader's previous copyright violations, WP:OTRS confirmation of the claim the the uploader is copyright holder is needed. Whpq (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.