Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 April 10

< April 9	April 11 >

April 10[edit]

File:Guiyu11.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The author of the image is Bert van Dijk. It was taken on November 1, 2008 and relased under CC-by-nc-sa 2.0 on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/zilpho/2995063344/ MarioGom (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adelita's Misfortune by Shonda Bottke.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There does not seem to be any indication that the underlying work "Adelita's Misfortune" itself is free. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 20:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SpringRiverSong2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's current use on a section of article Yao Beina fails acceptable standards at WP:Non-free content. The deceased subject had already a main infobox photo of her. This image in question was captioned: When singing "The Spring River" on New Year's Eve Gala of 2011, she combined Tibetan folk style with rock to sing this Chinese folk song, finishing with a G5 note that lasted 7.7 seconds. I cannot see how the non-free image's inclusion in the section and its caption influence my understanding on her music/singing styles. This is much better represented by an actual non-free music sample, than a still image of a copyrighted video that has failed to convey its intended meaning. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This photo doesn't significantly contribute to the reader's understanding. An audio sample might be worth including instead. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.