Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 18[edit]

File:Greater London Authority flag 2020.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free -FASTILY 06:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater London Authority flag 2020.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cordyceps-Zombie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Greater London Authority flag 2020.png Magog the Ogre (tc) 04:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the linked deletion request at Commons simply states "copyright violation" with no further detail or explanation. I guess that the rationale is that it is too complex for the claimed PD because it's only simple shapes tag currently on the file - I have no opinion on whether that is or is not correct. Regardless, it seems likely that it would be possible to use this file on en.wp under fair use on some (but definitely not all) the places it is currently used, e.g. the Flag of Greater London article. Thryduulf (talk) 21:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have changed the copyright tag from {{PD-textlogo}} to {{Non-free logo}}. FURs need to be written for the article(s) in which the image might satisfy WP:NFCC#8. It sounds as if this might be the current flag, so it seems reasonable to use it in the Flag of Greater London article. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NSHR Logo.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSHR Logo.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Raed 5 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned; no apparent use — Pbrks (talk) 04:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CuCl in situ.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CuCl in situ.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chemicalinterest (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, unfocused image of copper(I) chloride. plicit 10:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value due to its poor quality. Salavat (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiger flying ensign 20.10.10 desktop.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiger flying ensign 20.10.10 desktop.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dornsby (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, near duplicate of File:Tiger flying ensign 2 20.10.10.jpg. This version is slightly more cropped than the Commons file. plicit 10:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 03:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masiakasaurus skull FMNH.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masiakasaurus skull FMNH.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DeinonychusDinosaur999 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, blurry photo of a Masiakasaurus skull. Superseded by images in Category:Masiakasaurus skulls. plicit 10:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value due to its poor quality. Salavat (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RuncuGJ00.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:RuncuGJ00.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Simiprof (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per COM:FOP Romania, there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. This is an unacceptable derivative work of an information board. plicit 11:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:E K Cole.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:E K Cole.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HughJLF (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:E K Cole.jpg Magog the Ogre (tc) 12:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, artist didn't die until 1962 so the work is still copyrighted under UK rules. The usage in the EKCO article doesn't seem to warrant it being relicensed for fair use. Salavat (talk) 03:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cathy Yan Behind.the.scenes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathy Yan Behind.the.scenes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DisneyMetalhead (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Conflicting licenses. The image is labelled as non-free content and also CC-BY-3.0. The given source is a youtube video that does assert a Youtube CC license however, it is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. The uploader has a grand total of 237 subscribers which doesn't square with a professionally produced movie entertainment interview. The same interview is also here with no CC licensing. Given this, the CC license is not applicable. With respect to non-free content, Commons has File:Cathy Yan, January 2020.jpg although it has not yet had a license review. Regardless, the subject is a living person so fails WP:NFCC#1 if treated as non-free content. Whpq (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.